Philadelphia Beverage Tax and Association With Prices, Purchasing, and Individual-Level Substitution in a National Pharmacy Chain.


Journal

JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Jul 2023
Historique:
medline: 17 7 2023
pubmed: 13 7 2023
entrez: 13 7 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Taxes on sweetened beverages are being implemented around the globe; an understanding of these taxes on individual-level behavior is necessary. To evaluate the degree to which the sweetened beverage tax in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, was associated with changes in beverage prices and individual-level purchasing over time at a national pharmacy chain in Philadelphia compared with Baltimore, Maryland. Using a difference-in-differences approach and generalized linear mixed models, this cohort study examined beverage purchases made by loyalty cardholders at a national chain pharmacy retailer with stores in Philadelphia and Baltimore (control city) from before tax to after tax. Beverage sales (in US dollars) were linked by unique loyalty card numbers to enable longitudinal analyses. Data were collected from January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2017 (2 years before tax and 1 year after tax); data analyses were conducted from January through October 2022. Implementation of Philadelphia's 1.5 cents/oz tax on sweetened beverages. The outcomes were the change in mean beverage price per-ounce and mean beverage volume purchased per cardholder transaction. Individual-level point-of-sale scanner data from all beverage purchases were analyzed. A total of 1188 unique beverages were purchased from the same stores before tax and after tax. There were 231 065 unique cardholders in Philadelphia and 82 517 in Baltimore. Mean prices of taxed beverages (n = 2 094 220) increased by 1.6 (95% CI, 1.3-2.0) cents/oz (106.7% pass-through) in Philadelphia compared with Baltimore from before tax to after tax. Philadelphia cardholders purchased 7.8% (95% CI -8.1% to -7.5%) fewer ounces of taxed beverages and 1.1% (95% CI, 0.6%-1.7%) more ounces of nontaxed beverages per transaction. Taxed beverages made up a smaller percentage of cardholders' overall beverage purchases after tax (-13.4% [95% CI, -14.2% to -12.6%]), while nontaxed beverages made up a larger share (9.3% [95% CI, 7.7%-10.7%]). In this longitudinal cohort study of the Philadelphia beverage tax, the tax was completely passed through to prices and was associated with a 7.8% decline in ounces of taxed beverages purchased at a national pharmacy chain.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37440231
pii: 2807192
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.23200
pmc: PMC10346119
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e2323200

Subventions

Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : K24 HL163073
Pays : United States

Références

Nutrients. 2019 Aug 08;11(8):
pubmed: 31398911
JAMA. 2019 May 14;321(18):1799-1810
pubmed: 32930704
Am J Public Health. 2020 Jul;110(7):1017-1023
pubmed: 32437271
J Health Econ. 2019 Sep;67:102225
pubmed: 31476602
Am J Clin Nutr. 2020 Sep 1;112(3):644-651
pubmed: 32619214
Public Health Nutr. 2001 Dec;4(6):1279-86
pubmed: 11796091
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Mar;22(4):750-756
pubmed: 30560754
Adv Nutr. 2018 Mar 1;9(2):78-85
pubmed: 29659683
Obes Rev. 2013 Aug;14(8):606-19
pubmed: 23763695
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Jun;62(6):921-929
pubmed: 35221175
Health Econ. 2020 Oct;29(10):1289-1306
pubmed: 33463850
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jul;39(7):1130-1139
pubmed: 32634353
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013 Jan;113(1):43-53
pubmed: 23260723
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2215284
pubmed: 35648405
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 May;37:100856
pubmed: 32070906
PLoS Med. 2017 Apr 18;14(4):e1002283
pubmed: 28419108
Fed Regist. 2016 May 27;81(103):34000-47
pubmed: 27236871
Annu Rev Public Health. 2019 Apr 1;40:187-201
pubmed: 30601721

Auteurs

Sophia V Hua (SV)

Department of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Joshua Petimar (J)

Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Nandita Mitra (N)

Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Christina A Roberto (CA)

Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Erica L Kenney (EL)

Department of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Anne N Thorndike (AN)

Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston.

Eric B Rimm (EB)

Department of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Kevin G Volpp (KG)

Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Laura A Gibson (LA)

Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH