Data-driven categorization of postoperative delirium symptoms using unsupervised machine learning.
K-means clustering
cancer surgery
delirium rating scale-revised-98
hypothesis-free categorization
phenotype
postoperative delirium
Journal
Frontiers in psychiatry
ISSN: 1664-0640
Titre abrégé: Front Psychiatry
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101545006
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
14
04
2023
accepted:
08
06
2023
medline:
13
7
2023
pubmed:
13
7
2023
entrez:
13
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Phenotyping analysis that includes time course is useful for understanding the mechanisms and clinical management of postoperative delirium. However, postoperative delirium has not been fully phenotyped. Hypothesis-free categorization of heterogeneous symptoms may be useful for understanding the mechanisms underlying delirium, although evidence is currently lacking. Therefore, we aimed to explore the phenotypes of postoperative delirium following invasive cancer surgery using a data-driven approach with minimal prior knowledge. We recruited patients who underwent elective invasive cancer resection. After surgery, participants completed 5 consecutive days of delirium assessments using the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R-98) severity scale. We categorized 65 (13 questionnaire items/day × 5 days) dimensional DRS-R-98 scores using unsupervised machine learning (K-means clustering) to derive a small set of grouped features representing distinct symptoms across all participants. We then reapplied K-means clustering to this set of grouped features to delineate multiple clusters of delirium symptoms. Participants were 286 patients, of whom 91 developed delirium defined according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, criteria. Following the first K-means clustering, we derived four grouped symptom features: (1) mixed motor, (2) cognitive and higher-order thinking domain with perceptual disturbance and thought content abnormalities, (3) acute and temporal response, and (4) sleep-wake cycle disturbance. Subsequent K-means clustering permitted classification of participants into seven subgroups: (i) cognitive and higher-order thinking domain dominant delirium, (ii) prolonged delirium, (iii) acute and brief delirium, (iv) subsyndromal delirium-enriched, (v) subsyndromal delirium-enriched with insomnia, (vi) insomnia, and (vii) fit. We found that patients who have undergone invasive cancer resection can be delineated using unsupervised machine learning into three delirium clusters, two subsyndromal delirium clusters, and an insomnia cluster. Validation of clusters and research into the pathophysiology underlying each cluster will help to elucidate the mechanisms of postoperative delirium after invasive cancer surgery.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Phenotyping analysis that includes time course is useful for understanding the mechanisms and clinical management of postoperative delirium. However, postoperative delirium has not been fully phenotyped. Hypothesis-free categorization of heterogeneous symptoms may be useful for understanding the mechanisms underlying delirium, although evidence is currently lacking. Therefore, we aimed to explore the phenotypes of postoperative delirium following invasive cancer surgery using a data-driven approach with minimal prior knowledge.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
We recruited patients who underwent elective invasive cancer resection. After surgery, participants completed 5 consecutive days of delirium assessments using the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R-98) severity scale. We categorized 65 (13 questionnaire items/day × 5 days) dimensional DRS-R-98 scores using unsupervised machine learning (K-means clustering) to derive a small set of grouped features representing distinct symptoms across all participants. We then reapplied K-means clustering to this set of grouped features to delineate multiple clusters of delirium symptoms.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Participants were 286 patients, of whom 91 developed delirium defined according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, criteria. Following the first K-means clustering, we derived four grouped symptom features: (1) mixed motor, (2) cognitive and higher-order thinking domain with perceptual disturbance and thought content abnormalities, (3) acute and temporal response, and (4) sleep-wake cycle disturbance. Subsequent K-means clustering permitted classification of participants into seven subgroups: (i) cognitive and higher-order thinking domain dominant delirium, (ii) prolonged delirium, (iii) acute and brief delirium, (iv) subsyndromal delirium-enriched, (v) subsyndromal delirium-enriched with insomnia, (vi) insomnia, and (vii) fit.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
We found that patients who have undergone invasive cancer resection can be delineated using unsupervised machine learning into three delirium clusters, two subsyndromal delirium clusters, and an insomnia cluster. Validation of clusters and research into the pathophysiology underlying each cluster will help to elucidate the mechanisms of postoperative delirium after invasive cancer surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37441147
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1205605
pmc: PMC10333495
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1205605Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Sri-iesaranusorn, Sadahiro, Murakami, Wada, Shimizu, Yoshida, Aoki, Uezono, Matsuoka, Ikeda and Yoshimoto.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2018 Nov;30(11):1287-1295
pubmed: 30051417
Psychosomatics. 2010 Sep-Oct;51(5):425-31
pubmed: 20833942
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Aug 17;18(8):
pubmed: 28817109
Psychosomatics. 2013 May-Jun;54(3):227-38
pubmed: 23218057
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2015;27(2):e122-7
pubmed: 25923855
Br J Psychiatry. 2012 Jan;200(1):37-44
pubmed: 22075650
J Psychosom Res. 2012 Jul;73(1):10-7
pubmed: 22691554
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 Jul;28(7):1221-8
pubmed: 26847532
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jan;41(1):28-33
pubmed: 24857381
J Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Sep/Oct;78(8):e970-e979
pubmed: 28767209
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007 Oct;62(10):1182-3
pubmed: 17921434
N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 16;354(11):1157-65
pubmed: 16540616
J Psychosom Res. 2011 Dec;71(6):395-403
pubmed: 22118382
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Aug;27(8):2999-3006
pubmed: 30607674
J Clin Psychiatry. 2019 Dec 17;81(1):
pubmed: 31851436
Psychosomatics. 2009 May-Jun;50(3):255-62
pubmed: 19567765
Nat Rev Neurol. 2009 Apr;5(4):210-20
pubmed: 19347026
Int Psychogeriatr. 2014 Apr;26(4):693-702
pubmed: 24429062
J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
pubmed: 1202204
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Mar;138(3):266-71
pubmed: 22431871
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Apr 14;15:4053-4065
pubmed: 35444455
Transl Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 24;10(1):299
pubmed: 32839448
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1998 May;28(5):333-8
pubmed: 9703862
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2018 Fall;30(4):294-301
pubmed: 30045679
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;32(4):386-396
pubmed: 28093812
Psychosomatics. 2009 May-Jun;50(3):248-54
pubmed: 19567764
Can J Neurol Sci. 2011 Sep;38(5):673-80
pubmed: 21856568
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 21;8:CD012317
pubmed: 30129968
Age Ageing. 2006 Jul;35(4):350-64
pubmed: 16648149
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2022 Nov 3;52(11):1276-1281
pubmed: 35907781
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Dec 29;17(1):298
pubmed: 29284416
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 01;47(6):505-511
pubmed: 28334798
Psychosomatics. 2008 Jul-Aug;49(4):300-8
pubmed: 18621935
JAMA. 2019 Feb 5;321(5):473-483
pubmed: 30721296
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2015 Jun;31(3):165-70
pubmed: 25468294
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Nov;19(12):3963-70
pubmed: 22699802
Psychosomatics. 2002 May-Jun;43(3):183-94
pubmed: 12075033
J Pineal Res. 2020 May;68(4):e12644
pubmed: 32145098
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 Apr;29(4):368-75
pubmed: 15857740
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2008 Spring;20(2):185-93
pubmed: 18451189
World J Surg. 2019 Jan;43(1):134-142
pubmed: 30128769
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018 Mar;3(3):223-230
pubmed: 29486863
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011 Spring;23(2):180-8
pubmed: 21677247
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001 Spring;13(2):229-42
pubmed: 11449030
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 14;11(4):e041214
pubmed: 33853791