In Vitro and In Vivo Drug-Response Profiling Using Patient-Derived High-Grade Glioma.
GBM
cancer
high-throughput screening (HTS)
organoid
phenotypic
Journal
Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Jun 2023
22 Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
04
05
2023
revised:
15
06
2023
accepted:
16
06
2023
medline:
14
7
2023
pubmed:
14
7
2023
entrez:
14
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Genomic profiling cannot solely predict the complexity of how tumor cells behave in their in vivo microenvironment and their susceptibility to therapies. The aim of the study was to establish a functional drug prediction model utilizing patient-derived GBM tumor samples for in vitro testing of drug efficacy followed by in vivo validation to overcome the disadvantages of a strict pharmacogenomics approach. High-throughput in vitro pharmacologic testing of patient-derived GBM tumors cultured as 3D organoids offered a cost-effective, clinically and phenotypically relevant model, inclusive of tumor plasticity and stroma. RNAseq analysis supplemented this 128-compound screening to predict more efficacious and patient-specific drug combinations with additional tumor stemness evaluated using flow cytometry. In vivo PDX mouse models rapidly validated (50 days) and determined mutational influence alongside of drug efficacy. We present a representative GBM case of three tumors resected at initial presentation, at first recurrence without any treatment, and at a second recurrence following radiation and chemotherapy, all from the same patient. Molecular and in vitro screening helped identify effective drug targets against several pathways as well as synergistic drug combinations of cobimetinib and vemurafenib for this patient, supported in part by in vivo tumor growth assessment. Each tumor iteration showed significantly varying stemness and drug resistance. Our integrative model utilizing molecular, in vitro, and in vivo approaches provides direct evidence of a patient's tumor response drifting with treatment and time, as demonstrated by dynamic changes in their tumor profile, which may affect how one would address that drift pharmacologically.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Genomic profiling cannot solely predict the complexity of how tumor cells behave in their in vivo microenvironment and their susceptibility to therapies. The aim of the study was to establish a functional drug prediction model utilizing patient-derived GBM tumor samples for in vitro testing of drug efficacy followed by in vivo validation to overcome the disadvantages of a strict pharmacogenomics approach.
METHODS
METHODS
High-throughput in vitro pharmacologic testing of patient-derived GBM tumors cultured as 3D organoids offered a cost-effective, clinically and phenotypically relevant model, inclusive of tumor plasticity and stroma. RNAseq analysis supplemented this 128-compound screening to predict more efficacious and patient-specific drug combinations with additional tumor stemness evaluated using flow cytometry. In vivo PDX mouse models rapidly validated (50 days) and determined mutational influence alongside of drug efficacy. We present a representative GBM case of three tumors resected at initial presentation, at first recurrence without any treatment, and at a second recurrence following radiation and chemotherapy, all from the same patient.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Molecular and in vitro screening helped identify effective drug targets against several pathways as well as synergistic drug combinations of cobimetinib and vemurafenib for this patient, supported in part by in vivo tumor growth assessment. Each tumor iteration showed significantly varying stemness and drug resistance.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our integrative model utilizing molecular, in vitro, and in vivo approaches provides direct evidence of a patient's tumor response drifting with treatment and time, as demonstrated by dynamic changes in their tumor profile, which may affect how one would address that drift pharmacologically.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37444398
pii: cancers15133289
doi: 10.3390/cancers15133289
pmc: PMC10339991
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R33 CA206949
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R33CA206949
Pays : United States
Références
Bioprocess Int. 2018 Oct;16(FR 8):1-5
pubmed: 35431667
Cancer Res. 2016 Apr 15;76(8):2465-77
pubmed: 26896279
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2018 Dec 1;172:665-673
pubmed: 30243220
J Neurosurg Sci. 2021 Aug 03;:
pubmed: 34342203
Nature. 2004 Nov 18;432(7015):396-401
pubmed: 15549107
Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2017;17(3):236-254
pubmed: 27993114
Oncotarget. 2018 Feb 13;9(19):14764-14790
pubmed: 29599906
Cancer Cell. 2022 Jan 10;40(1):26-35
pubmed: 34951956
Radiol Oncol. 2018 Jun 06;52(2):121-128
pubmed: 30018514
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Nov 20;38(33):3883-3894
pubmed: 33048619
Nature. 2006 Dec 7;444(7120):756-60
pubmed: 17051156
Cells. 2021 Dec 02;10(12):
pubmed: 34943910
J Biomol Screen. 1999;4(2):67-73
pubmed: 10838414
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Oct 1;18(19):5160-2
pubmed: 22912394
J Transl Med. 2021 Jan 21;19(1):40
pubmed: 33478472
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2016 Sep 01;8(9):
pubmed: 27194046
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Oct;23(10):1985-96
pubmed: 25053711
Cell Stem Cell. 2014 Aug 7;15(2):185-98
pubmed: 24835569
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Apr 21;22(9):
pubmed: 33919246
Nat Med. 2019 May;25(5):744-750
pubmed: 31011206
Nat Protoc. 2020 Dec;15(12):4000-4033
pubmed: 33169003
Cancer Cell. 2021 Sep 13;39(9):1190-1201
pubmed: 34416168
Cell. 2020 Jan 9;180(1):188-204.e22
pubmed: 31883794
Transl Cancer Res. 2019 Dec;8(Suppl 6):S606-S611
pubmed: 35117142
J Biomol Screen. 2015 Aug;20(7):858-68
pubmed: 25877150
Genes Dis. 2016 May 11;3(3):198-210
pubmed: 30258889
Cancer Discov. 2017 Jun;7(6):586-595
pubmed: 28365644
Cancer Cell. 2022 Jul 11;40(7):701-702
pubmed: 35714604
SLAS Discov. 2017 Jun;22(5):516-524
pubmed: 28346088
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Oct 03;22(19):
pubmed: 34639060
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Mar 12;21(6):
pubmed: 32178267
Biochem Pharmacol. 2019 Apr;162:169-176
pubmed: 30414937
JCO Precis Oncol. 2021 Jan 12;5:
pubmed: 33928209
Cancer Cell. 2020 Sep 14;38(3):366-379.e8
pubmed: 32649888
SLAS Discov. 2018 Sep;23(8):842-849
pubmed: 29750582
Cancer Res. 2004 Oct 1;64(19):7011-21
pubmed: 15466194
SLAS Discov. 2018 Jul;23(6):574-584
pubmed: 29673279
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Oct 1;18(19):5314-28
pubmed: 22825584
Science. 2019 Jun 07;364(6444):952-955
pubmed: 31171691
Glia. 2002 Sep;39(3):193-206
pubmed: 12203386
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2022 Jan;169:103540
pubmed: 34808376
Mol Cell Biochem. 2008 May;312(1-2):71-80
pubmed: 18259841
SLAS Technol. 2019 Aug;24(4):420-428
pubmed: 31225974
Genes Dev. 2015 Jun 15;29(12):1203-17
pubmed: 26109046
Acta Neuropathol. 2005 Jan;109(1):93-108
pubmed: 15685439