Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor T790M Mutation Testing in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An International Collaborative Study to Assess Molecular EGFR T790M Testing in Liquid Biopsy.

EGFR NGS NSCLC PCR T790M mutation liquid biopsy

Journal

Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Jul 2023
Historique:
received: 01 06 2023
revised: 26 06 2023
accepted: 27 06 2023
medline: 14 7 2023
pubmed: 14 7 2023
entrez: 14 7 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The detection of the EGFR T790M (T790M) mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who progressed under treatment with first- or second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is important to offer a subsequent therapy with a third-generation EGFR-TKI. Liquid biopsy is a powerful tool to determine the T790M mutation status. Several liquid biopsy platforms with varying degrees of accuracy are available to test for T790M mutations, and sensitivities may differ among these methods. As no standard exists for the testing of T790M mutation in liquid biopsy, we performed a collaborative study to describe and compare the sensitivity of different in-house liquid biopsy platforms for the detection of the T790M mutation, EGFR exon 19 deletion (del19) and EGFR L858R mutation (L858R) across multiple participating laboratories in seven Central and Eastern European countries. Of the 25 invited laboratories across Central and Eastern Europe, 21 centers participated and received 10 plasma samples spiked with cell-line DNA containing the T790M, del19, or L858R mutation in different concentrations. In-house PCR-based and NGS-based methods were used accordingly, and results were reported as in routine clinical practice. Two laboratories, which used the AmoyDx If a negative result was obtained from methods with lower sensitivity (e.g., Cobas), repeated liquid biopsy testing and/or tissue biopsy analysis should be performed whenever possible, to identify T790M-positive patients to allow them to receive the optimal second-line treatment with a third-generation EGFR TKI.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The detection of the EGFR T790M (T790M) mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who progressed under treatment with first- or second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is important to offer a subsequent therapy with a third-generation EGFR-TKI. Liquid biopsy is a powerful tool to determine the T790M mutation status. Several liquid biopsy platforms with varying degrees of accuracy are available to test for T790M mutations, and sensitivities may differ among these methods.
METHODS METHODS
As no standard exists for the testing of T790M mutation in liquid biopsy, we performed a collaborative study to describe and compare the sensitivity of different in-house liquid biopsy platforms for the detection of the T790M mutation, EGFR exon 19 deletion (del19) and EGFR L858R mutation (L858R) across multiple participating laboratories in seven Central and Eastern European countries.
RESULTS RESULTS
Of the 25 invited laboratories across Central and Eastern Europe, 21 centers participated and received 10 plasma samples spiked with cell-line DNA containing the T790M, del19, or L858R mutation in different concentrations. In-house PCR-based and NGS-based methods were used accordingly, and results were reported as in routine clinical practice. Two laboratories, which used the AmoyDx
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
If a negative result was obtained from methods with lower sensitivity (e.g., Cobas), repeated liquid biopsy testing and/or tissue biopsy analysis should be performed whenever possible, to identify T790M-positive patients to allow them to receive the optimal second-line treatment with a third-generation EGFR TKI.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37444638
pii: cancers15133528
doi: 10.3390/cancers15133528
pmc: PMC10340641
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG

Références

J Thorac Oncol. 2021 May;16(5):740-763
pubmed: 33338652
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr 20;35(12):1288-1296
pubmed: 28221867
Lung Cancer. 2020 Sep;147:123-129
pubmed: 32693293
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 May 15;22(10):2386-95
pubmed: 26747242
Curr Opin Oncol. 2016 Mar;28(2):130-4
pubmed: 26730486
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Dec;17(12):1643-1652
pubmed: 27751847
Cancer Res. 2001 Feb 15;61(4):1659-65
pubmed: 11245480
N Engl J Med. 2005 Feb 24;352(8):786-92
pubmed: 15728811
Annu Rev Pathol. 2011;6:49-69
pubmed: 20887192
Target Oncol. 2021 Jan;16(1):77-84
pubmed: 33270169
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):629-640
pubmed: 27959700
Lung Cancer. 2015 Dec;90(3):509-15
pubmed: 26494259
J Thorac Oncol. 2018 Sep;13(9):1248-1268
pubmed: 29885479
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 30;372(18):1689-99
pubmed: 25923549
Target Oncol. 2019 Feb;14(1):75-83
pubmed: 30539501
Ann Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;29(suppl_1):i20-i27
pubmed: 29462255
Target Oncol. 2019 Apr;14(2):197-203
pubmed: 30810887
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2019 Nov 25;11:1758835919890286
pubmed: 31803256
Target Oncol. 2018 Apr;13(2):141-156
pubmed: 29423594
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 03;15(5):
pubmed: 36900369
J Thorac Oncol. 2018 Jun;13(6):821-830
pubmed: 29505901
Semin Cancer Biol. 2020 Apr;61:167-179
pubmed: 31562956

Auteurs

Martin Filipits (M)

Center for Cancer Research, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Verena Kainz (V)

Division of Transplantation, Department of General Surgery, Medical University Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Viktor Sebek (V)

Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Hnevotinska st. 976/3, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic.

Herwig Zach (H)

Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, 1120 Vienna, Austria.

Classifications MeSH