Mid-Term Migration Behavior of an Uncemented Proximally Anchored Straight Stem-A Retrospective EBRA Migration Analysis.
Einzel Bild Röntgen Analyse
cementless
subsidence
total hip arthroplasty
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Jun 2023
28 Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
17
04
2023
revised:
17
06
2023
accepted:
23
06
2023
medline:
14
7
2023
pubmed:
14
7
2023
entrez:
14
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Aseptic loosening is one of the most-common causes of the failure of cementless stems. Einzel Bild Röntgen Analyse-Femoral Component Analysis (EBRA-FCA) allows the diagnosis of stem migration, which can be considered a factor in predicting implant survival. The current study aimed to present the migration behavior of a tapered proximally anchored straight stem. This retrospective study reviewed all consecutive patients who received a cementless CBC straight stem (Mathys AG, Bettlach, Switzerland) between 2005 and 2019. We analyzed the migration pattern using the EBRA-FCA software and reviewed their medical histories. In addition, periprosthetic radiolucency was rated according to the Gruen zones and femoral configuration according to Dorr. A total of 333 stems in 332 patients (female 191; male 141) met our inclusion criteria. The mean age at surgery was 63 (range 21-87) years. Migration analysis by EBRA-FCA showed a mean subsidence of 1.6 mm at final follow-up at 96 months with a maximum noted mean subsidence of 2.0 mm at 72 and 84 months. Dorr Type A showed a tendency of less subsidence than did Dorr Type B and was statistically significant at 6 ( The results showed migration behavior in cementless stems with initial increased migration and subsequent secondary stabilization, suggesting an excellent long-term outcome. Stem migration of this tapered proximally anchored stem might be lower in Dorr Type A than in Dorr Type B femurs without being statistically significant at all time points.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Aseptic loosening is one of the most-common causes of the failure of cementless stems. Einzel Bild Röntgen Analyse-Femoral Component Analysis (EBRA-FCA) allows the diagnosis of stem migration, which can be considered a factor in predicting implant survival. The current study aimed to present the migration behavior of a tapered proximally anchored straight stem.
METHODS
METHODS
This retrospective study reviewed all consecutive patients who received a cementless CBC straight stem (Mathys AG, Bettlach, Switzerland) between 2005 and 2019. We analyzed the migration pattern using the EBRA-FCA software and reviewed their medical histories. In addition, periprosthetic radiolucency was rated according to the Gruen zones and femoral configuration according to Dorr.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 333 stems in 332 patients (female 191; male 141) met our inclusion criteria. The mean age at surgery was 63 (range 21-87) years. Migration analysis by EBRA-FCA showed a mean subsidence of 1.6 mm at final follow-up at 96 months with a maximum noted mean subsidence of 2.0 mm at 72 and 84 months. Dorr Type A showed a tendency of less subsidence than did Dorr Type B and was statistically significant at 6 (
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The results showed migration behavior in cementless stems with initial increased migration and subsequent secondary stabilization, suggesting an excellent long-term outcome. Stem migration of this tapered proximally anchored stem might be lower in Dorr Type A than in Dorr Type B femurs without being statistically significant at all time points.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37445370
pii: jcm12134335
doi: 10.3390/jcm12134335
pmc: PMC10342542
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Mar;34(3):527-533
pubmed: 30545654
J Biomech. 2021 Mar 5;117:110262
pubmed: 33508723
J Rheumatol. 2019 Sep;46(9):1134-1140
pubmed: 30988126
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Oct 15;14(10):7080-7089
pubmed: 36398241
Hip Int. 2002 Apr-Jun;12(2):55-72
pubmed: 28124363
J Orthop. 2016 Jun 15;13(3):190-2
pubmed: 27408494
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jul;474(7):1697-706
pubmed: 27130649
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2011 Dec;19(3):269-73
pubmed: 22184152
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Nov;135(11):1609-14
pubmed: 26272583
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 May;101(3):289-96
pubmed: 25817907
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Mar;142(3):517-524
pubmed: 33999259
Acta Radiol. 1990 Mar;31(2):113-26
pubmed: 2196921
EFORT Open Rev. 2018 Feb 26;3(2):45-57
pubmed: 29657845
Hip Int. 2018 Sep;28(5):498-506
pubmed: 29783896
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001 Jul;83(5):767-71
pubmed: 11476320
J Orthop. 2016 Jul 05;13(4):322-6
pubmed: 27436922
Bone. 1993 May-Jun;14(3):231-42
pubmed: 8363862
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999 Mar;81(2):273-80
pubmed: 10204934
J Biomech. 2006;39(7):1169-79
pubmed: 15927191
J Arthroplasty. 1994 Aug;9(4):399-408
pubmed: 7964772
J Arthroplasty. 2021 May;36(5):1688-1694
pubmed: 33454150
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Feb;470(2):410-7
pubmed: 22045070
Acta Orthop. 2006 Aug;77(4):567-74
pubmed: 16929432
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979 Jun;(141):17-27
pubmed: 477100
Lancet. 2012 Nov 17;380(9855):1768-77
pubmed: 23021846
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994 May;76(3):432-8
pubmed: 8175848
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018 Jan-Apr;26(1):2309499017750310
pubmed: 29320963
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Jul;134(7):1003-8
pubmed: 24691814
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 02;9(7):
pubmed: 32630629
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Mar;31(3):622-5
pubmed: 26541220
Int Orthop. 2005 Dec;29(6):359-61
pubmed: 16184403
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Mar;32(3):891-897
pubmed: 27793497
Bone Joint J. 2016 Apr;98-B(4):461-7
pubmed: 27037427
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5
pubmed: 17403800
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Sep;87(9):1210-5
pubmed: 16129743
J Arthroplasty. 2005 Oct;20(7):857-65
pubmed: 16230235
Int Orthop. 2009 Dec;33(6):1501-5
pubmed: 19066889
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988 Oct;(235):148-65
pubmed: 3416522
Int Orthop. 2012 May;36(5):941-7
pubmed: 22052477
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 May;86(5):963-74
pubmed: 15118039
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999 Mar;81(2):266-72
pubmed: 10204933
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Aug;37(8):1494-1500
pubmed: 35189292
EFORT Open Rev. 2021 Jan 4;6(1):75-92
pubmed: 33532088
J Biomech. 2001 Jul;34(7):859-71
pubmed: 11410170
J Arthroplasty. 2007 Dec;22(8):1122-9
pubmed: 18078880
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2022 May 10;13:21514593221097608
pubmed: 35573905