The Magnitude of Contralateral Suppression of Otoacoustic Emissions Is Ear- and Age-Dependent.
contralateral acoustic stimulation
equivalent attenuation
general linear model
left ear
medial olivocochlear efferent
right ear
transient evoked otoacoustic emissions
uncrossed fibers
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Jul 2023
07 Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
20
06
2023
revised:
04
07
2023
accepted:
05
07
2023
medline:
14
7
2023
pubmed:
14
7
2023
entrez:
14
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The maturation of the uncrossed medial olivocochlear (UMOC) efferent remains poorly documented to date. The UMOC efferent system allows listeners to not only detect but also to process, recognize, and discriminate auditory stimuli. Its fibers can be explored non-invasively by recording the effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS), resulting in a decrease in the amplitude of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE). The objective of the present cross-sectional study was to investigate how the effectiveness of this system varies with age in healthy subjects aged 8 years to adulthood. For this purpose, 120 right-handed native French-speaking subjects (57 females and 63 males) were divided into five age groups of 24 subjects each: 8y-10y, 10y-11y6m, 11y6m-13y, 13y-17y, and ≥18y. TEOAE amplitudes with and without CAS were recorded. The equivalent attenuation (EA) was calculated, corresponding to the change in TEOAE amplitude equivalent to the effect generated by CAS. General linear models were performed to control for the effect of ear, sex, and age on EA. No sex effect was found. A stronger EA was consistently found regardless of age group in the right ear compared to the left. In contrast to the right ear, for which, on average, EA remained constant across age groups, an increasingly weaker TEOAE suppression effect with age was found in the left ear, reinforcing the asymmetrical functioning of the UMOC efferent system in favor of the right ear in adulthood. Further studies are needed to investigate the lateralization of the UMOC efferent system and its changes over time in cases of atypical or reversed cortical asymmetries, especially in subjects with specific learning disorders.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37445587
pii: jcm12134553
doi: 10.3390/jcm12134553
pmc: PMC10342437
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001 Jan;70(1):88-94
pubmed: 11118254
J Neurophysiol. 1991 Mar;65(3):724-35
pubmed: 2051201
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1994;514:89-94
pubmed: 8073895
Cerebellum. 2015 Oct;14(5):584-96
pubmed: 26142291
Hear Res. 2004 Dec;198(1-2):125-36
pubmed: 15567609
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2001 Dec;2(4):297-311
pubmed: 11833605
Brain. 2007 Nov;130(Pt 11):2915-28
pubmed: 17921181
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004 Apr;29(2):183-90
pubmed: 15113308
J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Jan;26(1):30-5
pubmed: 25597458
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2010 Feb;37(1):47-54
pubmed: 19411150
Hear Res. 2016 Feb;332:61-72
pubmed: 26619750
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 Apr;70(4):671-6
pubmed: 16198429
Neuron. 2015 Oct 7;88(1):93-109
pubmed: 26447575
Hear Res. 2005 Sep;207(1-2):1-9
pubmed: 16091301
J Acoust Soc Am. 1978 Nov;64(5):1386-91
pubmed: 744838
Ear Hear. 2006 Apr;27(2):153-60
pubmed: 16518143
Clin Neurophysiol. 2002 Mar;113(3):407-20
pubmed: 11897541
Cereb Cortex. 2006 Jul;16(7):941-8
pubmed: 16151174
PLoS One. 2016 May 19;11(5):e0155991
pubmed: 27195498
Hear Res. 1999 Aug;134(1-2):153-62
pubmed: 10452385
Brain Cogn. 2011 Jul;76(2):316-22
pubmed: 21530051
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Nov;6(11):877-88
pubmed: 16261181
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1990 Dec;99(12):993-7
pubmed: 2244732
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Mar - Apr;86(2):209-216
pubmed: 30772249
Int J Audiol. 2008 Oct;47(10):607-14
pubmed: 18923982
Audiol Res. 2022 Jan 19;12(1):79-86
pubmed: 35200258
Eur J Neurosci. 1998 Aug;10(8):2731-7
pubmed: 9767403
Front Syst Neurosci. 2015 Sep 30;9:134
pubmed: 26483647
J Am Acad Audiol. 2005 Sep;16(8):564-73
pubmed: 16295243
Neuroreport. 2015 May 27;26(8):483-7
pubmed: 25919996
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2015 Apr;16(2):223-40
pubmed: 25663383
Int J Audiol. 2007 Sep;46(9):460-78
pubmed: 17828663
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Jan;125(1):239-46
pubmed: 19173411
Handb Clin Neurol. 2015;129:3-25
pubmed: 25726260
Br Med Bull. 2002;63:223-41
pubmed: 12324396
J Comp Neurol. 2005 May 30;486(2):101-16
pubmed: 15844210
Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Dec;126(12):2348-55
pubmed: 25801342
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Jan-Feb;74(1):112-7
pubmed: 18392511
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Mar;280(3):1493-1499
pubmed: 36374345
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Jun;33(3):743-51
pubmed: 17563235
J Commun Disord. 2015 Nov-Dec;58:35-42
pubmed: 26431768
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Sep-Oct;74(5):737-745
pubmed: 19082357
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 May;132:109915
pubmed: 32028191
Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
pubmed: 5146491
J Acoust Soc Am. 1979 Sep;66(3):651-3
pubmed: 489836
Hear Res. 2017 Jan;343:34-49
pubmed: 27421755
Hear Res. 2019 Aug;379:1-11
pubmed: 31035222
Neuroscience. 2001;104(2):347-58
pubmed: 11377839
Audiol Neurootol. 2006;11(6):366-72
pubmed: 16988500
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Sep-Oct;81(5):491-7
pubmed: 26277589
Hear Res. 1990 Jan;43(2-3):251-61
pubmed: 2312416
Front Neurol. 2018 Mar 26;9:197
pubmed: 29632514
Pediatr Res. 2006 Feb;59(2):305-8
pubmed: 16439597
Hear Res. 1996 May;94(1-2):140-7
pubmed: 8789819