Assessing consciousness in patients with disorders of consciousness using soft-clustering.
Brain–computer interface
Complexity
Connectivity
Consciousness
Disorders of consciousness
Electroencephalogram
Soft-clustering
Spectral analysis
Journal
Brain informatics
ISSN: 2198-4018
Titre abrégé: Brain Inform
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101673751
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Jul 2023
14 Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
27
02
2023
accepted:
25
06
2023
medline:
14
7
2023
pubmed:
14
7
2023
entrez:
14
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Consciousness is something we experience in our everyday life, more especially between the time we wake up in the morning and go to sleep at night, but also during the rapid eye movement (REM) sleep stage. Disorders of consciousness (DoC) are states in which a person's consciousness is damaged, possibly after a traumatic brain injury. Completely locked-in syndrome (CLIS) patients, on the other hand, display covert states of consciousness. Although they appear unconscious, their cognitive functions are mostly intact. Only, they cannot externally display it due to their quadriplegia and inability to speak. Determining these patients' states constitutes a challenging task. The ultimate goal of the approach presented in this paper is to assess these CLIS patients consciousness states. EEG data from DoC patients are used here first, under the assumption that if the proposed approach is able to accurately assess their consciousness states, it will assuredly do so on CLIS patients too. This method combines different sets of features consisting of spectral, complexity and connectivity measures in order to increase the probability of correctly estimating their consciousness levels. The obtained results showed that the proposed approach was able to correctly estimate several DoC patients' consciousness levels. This estimation is intended as a step prior attempting to communicate with them, in order to maximise the efficiency of brain-computer interfaces (BCI)-based communication systems.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37450213
doi: 10.1186/s40708-023-00197-5
pii: 10.1186/s40708-023-00197-5
pmc: PMC10348975
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
16Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Jun;114(6):979-89
pubmed: 25951831
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2006 Nov;53(11):2282-8
pubmed: 17073334
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 20;9(1):8894
pubmed: 31222021
Cogn Neurodyn. 2015 Jun;9(3):291-304
pubmed: 25972978
Arch Neurol. 2006 Apr;63(4):562-9
pubmed: 16606770
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1999;52:3-6
pubmed: 10590970
Front Neurosci. 2017 May 05;11:251
pubmed: 28529473
Neuroimage Clin. 2021;29:102471
pubmed: 33388561
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 21;7(1):266
pubmed: 28325926
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2014 Jan;45(1):14-21
pubmed: 24415400
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2015 Feb 13;373(2034):
pubmed: 25548273
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:156869
pubmed: 21253357
Neurosci Lett. 2017 Jul 13;653:332-336
pubmed: 28610950
Anesthesiology. 2020 Oct 1;133(4):774-786
pubmed: 32930729
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2009 Apr;94(1):48-57
pubmed: 19041154
Brain Sci. 2022 Dec 29;13(1):
pubmed: 36672046
Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Oct;115(10):2292-307
pubmed: 15351371
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 07;10(8):e0133532
pubmed: 26252378
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2014 Feb;33(2):65-71
pubmed: 24393302
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 2;13(1):e0190458
pubmed: 29293607
Curr Biol. 2013 Oct 7;23(19):1914-9
pubmed: 24076243
J Neural Eng. 2014 Oct;11(5):056007
pubmed: 25082743
Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 Aug;130(8):1311-1319
pubmed: 31185362
Med Sci (Paris). 2015 Oct;31(10):904-11
pubmed: 26481030
Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Feb;126(2):404-11
pubmed: 24969375
Brain. 2018 Nov 1;141(11):3179-3192
pubmed: 30285102
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Feb 09;16:17
pubmed: 26860191
Ann Biomed Eng. 2014 Nov;42(11):2344-59
pubmed: 25113231
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 27;110(35):14432-7
pubmed: 23940340
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 20;10(1):14037
pubmed: 32820188
Anesth Analg. 2018 May;126(5):1763-1768
pubmed: 29481436