Nutrition policy reforms to address the double burden of malnutrition in Zambia: a prospective policy analysis.
Policy analysis
adolescents
double burden of malnutrition
food environments
policy reforms
Journal
Health policy and planning
ISSN: 1460-2237
Titre abrégé: Health Policy Plan
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8610614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Sep 2023
18 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
24
10
2022
revised:
31
05
2023
accepted:
13
07
2023
medline:
19
9
2023
pubmed:
15
7
2023
entrez:
15
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The evolution of nutrition patterns in Zambia has resulted in the coexistence of undernutrition and overnutrition in the same population, the double burden of malnutrition. While Zambia has strong policies addressing undernutrition and stunting, these do not adequately address food environment drivers of the double burden of malnutrition and the adolescent age group and hence the need for nutrition policy reforms. We conducted a theory-based qualitative prospective policy analysis involving in-depth interviews with nutrition policy stakeholders and policy document review to examine the feasibility of introducing nutrition policy options that address the double burden of malnutrition among adolescents to identify barriers and facilitators to such policy reforms. Using the multiple streams theory, we categorized the barriers and facilitators to prospective policy reforms into those related to the problem, policy solutions and politics stream. The use of a life-course approach in nutrition programming could facilitate policy reforms, as adolescence is one of the critical invention points in a person's lifecycle. Another key facilitator of policy reform was the availability of institutional infrastructure that could be leveraged to deliver adolescent-focused policies. However, the lack of evidence on the burden and long-term impacts of adolescent nutrition problems, the food industry's strong influence over governments' policy agenda setting and the lack of public awareness to demand better nutrition were perceived as critical barriers to policy reforms. In addition, the use of the individual responsibility framing for nutrition problems was dominant among stakeholders. As a result, stakeholders did not perceive legislative nutrition policy options that effectively address food environment drivers of the double burden of malnutrition to be feasible for the Zambian context. Policy entrepreneurs are required to broker policy reforms that will get legislative policy options on the government's agenda as they can help raise public support and re-engineer the framing of nutrition problems and their solutions in Zambia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37452507
pii: 7224618
doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad053
pmc: PMC10506529
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
926-938Subventions
Organisme : Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research
ID : Health Policy Analysis Fellowship
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Références
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Dec;4(12):e895-e896
pubmed: 27855860
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Aug;23(11):2053-2055
pubmed: 32434628
Global Health. 2016 Jun 02;12(1):24
pubmed: 27255275
J Healthc Leadersh. 2015 Sep 23;7:81-90
pubmed: 29355201
BMC Public Health. 2017 Apr 8;17(1):307
pubmed: 28390418
Am J Public Health. 2015 Nov;105(11):2228-36
pubmed: 26378841
Food Nutr Bull. 2020 Jun;41(2):244-260
pubmed: 32216553
Health Policy Plan. 2008 Sep;23(5):308-17
pubmed: 18701552
Global Health. 2015 Oct 12;11:41
pubmed: 26455446
PLoS Med. 2012;9(6):e1001241
pubmed: 22723745
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020 Jul 01;9(7):315-318
pubmed: 32613804
Lancet. 2022 Jan 8;399(10320):123-125
pubmed: 34856189
Global Health. 2020 Aug 17;16(1):74
pubmed: 32807183
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Oct;167:79-87
pubmed: 27614028
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jan 14;7(5):369-373
pubmed: 29764101
Health Promot Int. 2011 Mar;26(1):55-64
pubmed: 20739326
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Apr;5(4):
pubmed: 32354785
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Feb;23(2):374-383
pubmed: 31179956
Obes Rev. 2015 Jul;16(7):519-30
pubmed: 25988272
Bull World Health Organ. 2009 Aug;87(8):608-13
pubmed: 19705011
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014 Jul;68(7):753-9
pubmed: 24713622
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Apr 1;34(3):207-215
pubmed: 31006019
Appetite. 2021 Sep 1;164:105219
pubmed: 33774136
Global Health. 2016 Nov 5;12(1):70
pubmed: 27816061
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Nov;31(9):1200-11
pubmed: 27233927
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Sep 01;8(9):514-520
pubmed: 31657174
Health Policy. 1995 Apr-Jun;32(1-3):47-77
pubmed: 10172580
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 17;19(12):
pubmed: 35742706
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Sep 9;36(8):1257-1268
pubmed: 33826719
Glob Health Gov. 2010 Spring;3(2):
pubmed: 27274776
Health Place. 2016 May;39:204-11
pubmed: 27132687
Community Dent Health. 2019 May 30;36(2):152-156
pubmed: 31046206
Health Policy Plan. 2008 Sep;23(5):351-60
pubmed: 18664524
Obes Rev. 2011 Dec;12(12):1022-30
pubmed: 21831231
Glob Health Action. 2021 Jan 1;14(1):1872172
pubmed: 33876714
Lancet. 2020 Jan 4;395(10217):65-74
pubmed: 31852602
BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov 1;19(1):1438
pubmed: 31675935