Radiopacity evaluation of calcium silicate cements.
Biodentine
Calcium silicate cements
NeoMTA 2
OrthoMTA
ProRoot MTA
Radiopacity
Journal
BMC oral health
ISSN: 1472-6831
Titre abrégé: BMC Oral Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088684
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 07 2023
15 07 2023
Historique:
received:
30
09
2022
accepted:
28
06
2023
medline:
17
7
2023
pubmed:
16
7
2023
entrez:
15
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to compare the radiopacity of calcium silicate cements using a digital imaging method. Four calcium silicate cements, NeoMTA 2, OrthoMTA, ProRoot MTA, and Biodentine, were used in this study. Disk-shaped samples were prepared from each material and placed on a plexiglass plate. An aluminum step-wedge was placed alongside the samples on a digital sensor and exposed to 70 kVp and 8 mA from 30 cm away for 0.32 s. The greyness values of the tested materials were measured digitally with the system software and compared with those of the step-wedge to determine the equivalent aluminum thickness. The radiopacity values, expressed in equivalent millimetres of aluminum, of the studied materials ProRoot MTA, OrthoMTA, NeoMTA 2, and Biodentine were 4.32 ± 0.17 mm Al, 3.92 ± 0.09 mm Al, 3.83 ± 0.07 mm Al, and 2.29 ± 0.21 mm Al, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found between the mean radiographic density values of the tested materials (p < 0.05). ProRoot MTA was the most radiopaque root canal filling material among the tested materials. All materials, except Biodentine, were found to be compliant with the minimum radiopacity requirements of ISO 6876 and ADA 57 standards.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The aim of this study was to compare the radiopacity of calcium silicate cements using a digital imaging method.
METHODS
Four calcium silicate cements, NeoMTA 2, OrthoMTA, ProRoot MTA, and Biodentine, were used in this study. Disk-shaped samples were prepared from each material and placed on a plexiglass plate. An aluminum step-wedge was placed alongside the samples on a digital sensor and exposed to 70 kVp and 8 mA from 30 cm away for 0.32 s. The greyness values of the tested materials were measured digitally with the system software and compared with those of the step-wedge to determine the equivalent aluminum thickness.
RESULTS
The radiopacity values, expressed in equivalent millimetres of aluminum, of the studied materials ProRoot MTA, OrthoMTA, NeoMTA 2, and Biodentine were 4.32 ± 0.17 mm Al, 3.92 ± 0.09 mm Al, 3.83 ± 0.07 mm Al, and 2.29 ± 0.21 mm Al, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found between the mean radiographic density values of the tested materials (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
ProRoot MTA was the most radiopaque root canal filling material among the tested materials. All materials, except Biodentine, were found to be compliant with the minimum radiopacity requirements of ISO 6876 and ADA 57 standards.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37454108
doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03182-w
pii: 10.1186/s12903-023-03182-w
pmc: PMC10349491
doi:
Substances chimiques
tricalcium silicate
404G39282C
calcium silicate
S4255P4G5M
Aluminum
CPD4NFA903
Calcium Compounds
0
Oxides
0
Silicates
0
Root Canal Filling Materials
0
Aluminum Compounds
0
Drug Combinations
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
491Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Shah PM, Chong BS, Sidhu SK, Ford TR. Radiopacity of potential root-end filling materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996;81(4):476–9.
doi: 10.1016/S1079-2104(96)80028-X
pubmed: 8705597
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 13116. Test Method for determining radio-opacity of materials. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2014.
American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association (ANSI/ADA). Specification number; 57. York: Endodontic sealing materials; 2021.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 6876. Dental Root Canal Sealing materials. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 2012.
Rasimick BJ, Shah RP, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Radiopacity of endodontic materials on film and a digital sensor. J Endod. 2007;33(9):1098–101.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.05.005
pubmed: 17931942
Torabinejad M, Pitt Ford TR. Root end filling materials: a review. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1996;12(4):161–78.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1996.tb00510.x
pubmed: 9028180
Palma PJ, Marques JA, Falacho RI, et al. Six-Month Color Stability Assessment of two calcium silicate-based cements used in regenerative endodontic procedures. J Funct Biomater. 2019;10(1):14.
doi: 10.3390/jfb10010014
pubmed: 30823393
pmcid: 6462979
Macwan C, Deshpande A. Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) in dentistry: a review of literature. J Oral Res Rev. 2014;6(2):71–4.
doi: 10.4103/2249-4987.152914
Kaur M, Singh H, Dhillon JS, Batra M, Saini M. MTA versus Biodentine: review of literature with a comparative analysis. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(8):01–5.
Laurent P, Camps J, De Méo M, Déjou J, About I. Induction of specific cell responses to a ca(3)SiO(5)-based posterior restorative material. Dent Mater. 2008;24(11):1486–94.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.020
pubmed: 18448160
Kim M, Yang W, Kim H, Ko H. Comparison of the biological properties of ProRoot MTA, OrthoMTA, and endocem MTA cements. J Endod. 2014;40(10):1649–53.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.04.013
pubmed: 25052144
Anju PK, Purayil TP, Ginjupalli K, Ballal NV. “Effect of chelating agents on push-out bond strength of NeoMTA Plus to Root Canal Dentin”. Pesquisa Brasileira Em Odontopediatria E Clínica Integrada,2022;(22):1–9.
Kaup M, Schäfer E, Dammaschke T. An in vitro study of different material properties of Biodentine compared to ProRoot MTA. Head Face Med. 2015;2:11–6.
Rodríguez-Lozano FJ, Lozano A, López-García S, et al. Biomineralization potential and biological properties of a new tantalum oxide (Ta
doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04117-x
pubmed: 34382106
Chang SW, Baek SH, Yang HC, et al. Heavy metal analysis of ortho MTA and ProRoot MTA. J Endod. 2011;37(12):1673–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.08.020
pubmed: 22099903
Gümrü B, Türkaydın D, Sazak Öveçoğlu H. Evaluation of the radiopacity of a MTA based root canal filling material using digital radiography. Clin Exp Health Sci. 2014;12(1):19–25.
Akcay I, Ilhan B, Dundar N. Comparison of conventional and digital radiography systems with regard to radiopacity of root canal filling materials. Int Endod J. 2012;45(8):730–6.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02026.x
pubmed: 22458866
Elíasson ST, Haasken B. Radiopacity of impression materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1979;47(5):485–91.
doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(79)90136-1
pubmed: 286268
Beyer-Olsen EM, Orstavik D. Radiopacity of root canal sealers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1981;51(3):320–8.
doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(81)90062-1
pubmed: 6938892
Orhan EO, Irmak Ö, Bal EZ, et al. Radiopacity quantification and spectroscopic characterization of OrthoMTA and RetroMTA. Microsc Res Tech. 2021;84(6):1233–42.
doi: 10.1002/jemt.23682
pubmed: 33378578
Ochoa-Rodríguez VM, Tanomaru-Filho M, Rodrigues EM, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Spin-Neto R, Faria G. Addition of zirconium oxide to Biodentine increases radiopacity and does not alter its physicochemical and biological properties. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019;27:20180429.
doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0429
Ahmetoğlu F. Şimşek N,Keleş A,Ocak M,Altun O. Radiopacity evaluation of three calcium silicate based materials by digital radiography. Clin Dentistry Res. 2013;37(3):32–7.
McDonnell D, Price C. An evaluation of the Sens-A-Ray digital dental imaging system. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1993;(22):121–6.
Sabbagh J, Vreven J, Leloup G. Radiopacity of resin-based materials measured in film radiographs and storage phosphor plate (Digora). Oper Dent. 2004;29(6):677–84.
pubmed: 15646224
Grech L, Mallia B, Camilleri J. Investigation of the physical properties of tricalcium silicate cement-based root-end filling materials. Dent Mater. 2013;29(2):20–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.11.007
Corral C, Negregete P, Estay J, Osorio S, Covarrubias C, Olivera Junior OB, Barud H. Radiopacity and chemical assessment of new commercial calcium silicate based cements. Int J Odontostomat. 2018;12(3):262–8.
doi: 10.4067/S0718-381X2018000300262
Coaguila-Llerena H, Ochoa-Rodriguez VM, Castro-Núñez GM, Faria G, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Tanomaru-Filho M. Physicochemical Properties of a Bioceramic Repair Material - BioMTA. Braz Dent J. 2020;31(5):511–5.
doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202003163
pubmed: 33146335
Bachoo IK, Seymour D, Brunton P. Clinical case reports using a novel calcium-based cement. Br Dent J. 2013;214(2):61–4.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.53
pubmed: 23348450
Gandolfi MG, Siboni F, Prati C. Chemical-physical properties of TheraCal, a novel light-curable MTA-like material for pulp capping. Int Endod J. 2012;45(6):571–9.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02013.x
pubmed: 22469093
Kang TY, Choi JW, Seo KJ, Kim KM, Kwon JS, Physical. Chemical, Mechanical, and Biological Properties of four different Commercial Root-End filling materials: a comparative study. Materials. 2021;14(7):1693.
doi: 10.3390/ma14071693
pubmed: 33808262
pmcid: 8036496
Khalil I, Naaman A, Camilleri J. Investigation of a novel mechanically mixed mineral trioxide aggregate (MM-MTA(™)). Int Endod J. 2015;48(8):757–67.
doi: 10.1111/iej.12373
pubmed: 25155985
Pelepenko LE, Saavedra F, Antunes TBM, et al. Physicochemical, antimicrobial, and biological properties of White-MTAFlow. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(2):663–72.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03543-7
pubmed: 32864726
Torabinejad M, Hong CU, McDonald F, Pitt Ford TR. Physical and chemical properties of a new root-end filling material. J Endod. 1995;21(7):349–53.
doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80967-2
pubmed: 7499973
Wang CW, Chiang TY, Chang HC, Ding SJ. Physicochemical properties and osteogenic activity of radiopaque calcium silicate-gelatin cements. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2014;25(9):2193–203.
doi: 10.1007/s10856-014-5258-5
pubmed: 24970350
Islam I, Chng HK, Yap AU. Comparison of the physical and mechanical properties of MTA and portland cement. J Endod. 2006;32(3):193–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.043
pubmed: 16500224
Min KS, Chang HS, Bae JM, Park SH, Hong CU, Kim EC. The induction of heme oxygenase-1 modulates bismuth oxide-induced cytotoxicity in human dental pulp cells. J Endod. 2007 Nov;33(11):1342–6.
Choi Y, Hwang YC, Yu MK, Lee KW, Min KS. Effects of barium titanate on the dielectric constant, radiopacity, and biological properties of tricalcium silicate-based bioceramics. Dent Mater J. 2023;42(1):55–63.
doi: 10.4012/dmj.2022-069
pubmed: 36244737
Chen MS, Chen SH, Lai FC, et al. Sintering pmperature-dependence on Radiopacity of Bi
doi: 10.3390/ma11091685
White S, Pharoah M. Oral radiography principles and interpretation. St. Louis: Mosby; 2004. pp. 225–44.
Akdeniz BG, Gröndahl H-G, Kose T. Effect of delayed scanning of storage phosphor plates. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology. 2005;99(5):603–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.10.021