Direct-cortical visual evoked potential monitoring during brain tumor resection.


Journal

Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia
ISSN: 1532-2653
Titre abrégé: J Clin Neurosci
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 9433352

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Historique:
received: 12 02 2023
revised: 05 06 2023
accepted: 20 06 2023
medline: 23 8 2023
pubmed: 16 7 2023
entrez: 16 7 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Visual evoked potential (VEP) recording is traditionally regarded as an unreliable evoked potential monitoring technique, precluding widespread use in intracranial neurosurgery. However, VEPs can serve as a useful intraoperative adjunct for real-time detection of mechanical damage to optic apparatuses. The low obtainability and prognostic utility of VEPs are associated with transcranial recording, which typically provides non-focal information and poor signal-to-noise ratio. Direct cortical VEP (DC-VEP) recordings may offer a solution. We evaluated the obtainability of DC-VEPs as well as their prognostic utility in predicting postoperative visual function deterioration in a series of brain tumor patients undergoing craniotomies for tumor resection. Patient records were retrospectively reviewed for all consecutive patients undergoing brain tumor resections with DC-VEP monitoring. Pre- and postoperative visual fields were characterized from patient charts and associated with the presence of intraoperative monitoring alerts to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) of DC-VEPs in detecting postoperative visual field deficits. Twenty-two patients (9 male, 13 female) were included, with a median age of 60 years. DC-VEPs were reliably detected in 19 of 23 included surgeries (82.6%). The reported sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV in detecting postoperative visual field deficits was 60%, 92.9%, 75%, and 86.7%, respectively. There was a statistically significant association between monitoring alerts and the presence of visual field deterioration by Fischer's exact test (p = 0.0374). DC-VEPs can be reliably obtained and are useful for detecting mechanical injury to optic areas and tracts during tumor resection.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Visual evoked potential (VEP) recording is traditionally regarded as an unreliable evoked potential monitoring technique, precluding widespread use in intracranial neurosurgery. However, VEPs can serve as a useful intraoperative adjunct for real-time detection of mechanical damage to optic apparatuses. The low obtainability and prognostic utility of VEPs are associated with transcranial recording, which typically provides non-focal information and poor signal-to-noise ratio. Direct cortical VEP (DC-VEP) recordings may offer a solution.
METHODS METHODS
We evaluated the obtainability of DC-VEPs as well as their prognostic utility in predicting postoperative visual function deterioration in a series of brain tumor patients undergoing craniotomies for tumor resection. Patient records were retrospectively reviewed for all consecutive patients undergoing brain tumor resections with DC-VEP monitoring. Pre- and postoperative visual fields were characterized from patient charts and associated with the presence of intraoperative monitoring alerts to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) of DC-VEPs in detecting postoperative visual field deficits.
RESULTS RESULTS
Twenty-two patients (9 male, 13 female) were included, with a median age of 60 years. DC-VEPs were reliably detected in 19 of 23 included surgeries (82.6%). The reported sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV in detecting postoperative visual field deficits was 60%, 92.9%, 75%, and 86.7%, respectively. There was a statistically significant association between monitoring alerts and the presence of visual field deterioration by Fischer's exact test (p = 0.0374).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
DC-VEPs can be reliably obtained and are useful for detecting mechanical injury to optic areas and tracts during tumor resection.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37454439
pii: S0967-5868(23)00160-1
doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2023.06.014
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-7

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Harshal A Shah (HA)

Department of Neurological Surgery, North Shore University Hospital, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, Northwell, Manhasset, NY, United States. Electronic address: hshah5@northwell.edu.

Sabrina L Begley (SL)

Department of Neurological Surgery, North Shore University Hospital, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, Northwell, Manhasset, NY, United States.

Prashin Unadkat (P)

Department of Neurological Surgery, North Shore University Hospital, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, Northwell, Manhasset, NY, United States; Elmezzi Graduate School of Molecular Medicine, Feinstein Institutes of Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, United States.

Kaitlin Kelly Hugo (K)

Physiologic Assessment Services LLC, Teaneck, NJ, United States.

Michael Schulder (M)

Department of Neurological Surgery, North Shore University Hospital, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, Northwell, Manhasset, NY, United States.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH