Observing the fragmentation of two expanding bullet types and a full metal-jacketed bullet with computed tomography-a forensic ballistics case study.

Ballistic imaging Computed tomography Expanding bullet Firearm Gelatine Gunshot Terminal ballistics

Journal

International journal of legal medicine
ISSN: 1437-1596
Titre abrégé: Int J Legal Med
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9101456

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Jul 2023
Historique:
received: 08 05 2023
accepted: 07 07 2023
medline: 17 7 2023
pubmed: 17 7 2023
entrez: 16 7 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Computed tomography (CT) may have a crucial role in the forensic documentation and analysis of firearm injuries. The aim of this forensic ballistics case study was to explore whether two types of expanding bullets and a full metal-jacketed bullet could be differentiated by inspecting bullet fragments and fragmentation pattern in CT. Three types of .30 caliber bullets (full metal-jacketed Norma Jaktmatch, expanding full-copper Norma Ecostrike, and expanding soft-point Norma Oryx) were test fired from a distance of 5 m to blocks of 10% ballistic gelatine. CT scans of the blocks were obtained with clinical equipment and metal artifact reduction. Radiopaque fragments were identified and fragmentation parameters were obtained from the scans (total number of fragments, maximum diameter of the largest fragment, distance between entrance and the closest fragment, length of the fragment cloud, and maximum diameters of the fragment cloud). The fragmentation patterns were additionally visualized by means of 3D reconstruction. In CT, the bullet types differed in several fragmentation parameters. While the expanding full-copper bullet Ecostrike left behind only a single fragment near the end of the bullet channel, the soft-point Oryx had hundreds of fragments deposited throughout the channel. For both expanding bullets Ecostrike and Oryx, the fragments were clearly smaller than those left behind by the full metal-jacketed Jaktmatch. This was surprising as the full metal-jacketed bullet was expected to remain intact. The fragment cloud of Jaktmatch had similar mediolateral and superoinferior diameters to that of Oryx; however, fragments were deposited in the second half of the gelatine block, and not throughout the block. This case study provides a basis and potential methodology for further experiments. The findings are expected to benefit forensic practitioners with limited background information on gunshot injury cases, for example, those that involve several potential firearms or atypical gunshot wounds. The findings may prove beneficial for both human and wildlife forensics.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37455274
doi: 10.1007/s00414-023-03062-6
pii: 10.1007/s00414-023-03062-6
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Zhang M (2022) Forensic imaging: a powerful tool in modern forensic investigation. Forensic Sci Res 7:385–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2021.2008705
doi: 10.1080/20961790.2021.2008705 pubmed: 36353311 pmcid: 9639533
Thali MJ, Yen K, Vock P et al (2003) Image-guided virtual autopsy findings of gunshot victims performed with multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and subsequent correlation between radiology and autopsy findings. Forensic Sci Int 138:8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(03)00225-1
doi: 10.1016/S0379-0738(03)00225-1 pubmed: 14642714
Rutty GN, Boyce P, Robinson CE et al (2008) The role of computed tomography in terminal ballistic analysis. Int J Legal Med 122:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00414-006-0145-3/METRICS
doi: 10.1007/S00414-006-0145-3/METRICS pubmed: 17205351
Hanna TN, Shuaib W, Han T et al (2015) Firearms, bullets, and wound ballistics: an imaging primer. Injury 46:1186–1196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.034
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.034 pubmed: 25724396
Ditkofsky N, Nair JR, Frank Y et al (2023) Understanding ballistic injuries. Radiol Clin N Am 61:119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RCL.2022.08.005
doi: 10.1016/J.RCL.2022.08.005 pubmed: 36336385
Carr DJ, Stevenson T, Mahoney PF (2018) The use of gelatine in wound ballistics research. Int J Legal Med 132:1659–1664. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00414-018-1831-7/FIGURES/4
doi: 10.1007/S00414-018-1831-7/FIGURES/4 pubmed: 29696465 pmcid: 6208714
Schyma CWA (2020) Ballistic gelatine—what we see and what we get. Int J Legal Med 134:309–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00414-019-02177-Z/METRICS
doi: 10.1007/S00414-019-02177-Z/METRICS pubmed: 31680211
Humphrey C, Kumaratilake J (2016) Ballistics and anatomical modelling – a review. Legal Med 23:21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEGALMED.2016.09.002
doi: 10.1016/J.LEGALMED.2016.09.002 pubmed: 27890098
Bolliger SA, Thali MJ, Bolliger MJ, Kneubuehl BP (2010) Gunshot energy transfer profile in ballistic gelatine, determined with computed tomography using the total crack length method. Int J Legal Med 124:613–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00414-010-0503-Z/METRICS
doi: 10.1007/S00414-010-0503-Z/METRICS pubmed: 20725735
Burgos-Díez I, Zapata F, Chamorro-Sancho MJ et al (2021) Comparison between computed tomography and silicone-casting methods to determine gunshot cavities in ballistic soap. Int J Legal Med 135:829–836. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00414-020-02464-0/METRICS
doi: 10.1007/S00414-020-02464-0/METRICS pubmed: 33190163
Gremse F, Krone O, Thamm M et al (2014) Performance of lead-free versus lead-based hunting ammunition in ballistic soap. PLoS One 9:e102015. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0102015
doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0102015 pubmed: 25029572 pmcid: 4100882
Miller CR, Haag M, Gerrard C et al (2016) Comparative evaluation of potentially radiolucent projectile components by radiographs and computed tomography. J Forensic Sci 61:1563–1570. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13225
doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13225 pubmed: 27787896
Schyma C (2012) Wounding capacity of muzzle-gas pressure. Int J Legal Med 126:371–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00414-011-0641-Y/METRICS
doi: 10.1007/S00414-011-0641-Y/METRICS pubmed: 22081042
Korac Z, Kelenc D, Baskot A et al (2001) Substitute ellipse of the permanent cavity in gelatin blocks and debridement of gunshot wounds. Mil Med 166:689–694
doi: 10.1093/milmed/166.8.689 pubmed: 11515318
Nee N, Inaba K, Schellenberg M et al (2021) Retained bullet fragments after nonfatal gunshot wounds: epidemiology and outcomes. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 90:973–979. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000003089
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003089 pubmed: 33496545
Caudell JN (2013) Review of wound ballistic research and its applicability to wildlife management. Wildl Soc Bull 37:824–831. https://doi.org/10.1002/WSB.311
doi: 10.1002/WSB.311
Jussila J (2004) Preparing ballistic gelatine—review and proposal for a standard method. Forensic Sci Int 141:91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FORSCIINT.2003.11.036
doi: 10.1016/J.FORSCIINT.2003.11.036 pubmed: 15062946
Yu L, Primak AN, Liu X, McCollough CH (2009) Image quality optimization and evaluation of linearly mixed images in dual-source, dual-energy CT. Med Phys 36:1019–1024. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3077921
doi: 10.1118/1.3077921 pubmed: 19378762 pmcid: 2672422

Auteurs

Petteri Oura (P)

Department of Forensic Medicine, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 21, FI-00014, Helsinki, Finland. petteri.oura@helsinki.fi.
Forensic Medicine Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland. petteri.oura@helsinki.fi.
Research Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, P.O. Box 8000, FI-90014, Oulu, Finland. petteri.oura@helsinki.fi.

Jaakko Niinimäki (J)

Research Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, P.O. Box 8000, FI-90014, Oulu, Finland.
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University Hospital, Kajaanintie 50, 90220, Oulu, Finland.

Mikael Brix (M)

Research Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, P.O. Box 8000, FI-90014, Oulu, Finland.
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University Hospital, Kajaanintie 50, 90220, Oulu, Finland.

Eveliina Lammentausta (E)

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University Hospital, Kajaanintie 50, 90220, Oulu, Finland.

Timo Liimatainen (T)

Research Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, P.O. Box 8000, FI-90014, Oulu, Finland.
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University Hospital, Kajaanintie 50, 90220, Oulu, Finland.

Alina Junno (A)

Department of Archaeology, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 8000, FI-90014, Oulu, Finland.

Juho-Antti Junno (JA)

Department of Archaeology, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 8000, FI-90014, Oulu, Finland.
Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, P.O. Box 8000, FI-90014, Oulu, Finland.
Archaelogy, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 4, FI-00014, Helsinki, Finland.

Classifications MeSH