Survival of fixed prosthetic restorations on vital and nonvital teeth: A systematic review.
post and core
single crown and fixed dental prosthesis
survival and failure rates
systematic review
tooth vitality
tooth-supported prosthesis
Journal
Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists
ISSN: 1532-849X
Titre abrégé: J Prosthodont
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9301275
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Jul 2023
16 Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
09
09
2022
accepted:
06
07
2023
pubmed:
17
7
2023
medline:
17
7
2023
entrez:
17
7
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
To evaluate the survival rate of full-coverage tooth-supported fixed prosthetic restorations, single crowns (SCs), and fixed dental prostheses (FDPs), taking into consideration the potential influence of tooth-vitality, presence and type of post, and type of prosthetic restoration material. In October 2022, two authors independently conducted a search in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus electronic databases as well as a hand search to identify clinical human studies on full-coverage SCs and FDPs supported by vital and/or non-vital abutments and/or a combination of both, with a minimum observation period of 24 months. Out of 4198 studies identified through the database search and 22 through hand searching, 26 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis of the present systematic review. Included studies scored six points and more according to Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The highest estimated 5-year survival rate was observed for (metal-ceramic and all-ceramic) SCs on vital teeth (98.3%; 95% CI [98.1, 98.6%]) and all ceramic SCs on non-vital teeth with fiber post (95.0%; 95% CI [94.5-95.4%]). Metal-ceramic SCs on vital teeth (97.1%; 95% CI [95.6-98.7%]) showed a statistically significant higher estimated 5-year survival rate compared to metal-ceramic SCs with cast metal post (90.7%; 95% CI [87.4-94.0%], P < 0.001), fiber post (91.3%; 95% CI [90.9-91.6%], P < 0.001) and without post (85.7%; 95% CI [80.7, 90.6%], P < 0.032). All-ceramic SCs with fiber post had a statistically significant higher estimated 5-year survival rate (95.0%; 95% CI [94.5-95.4%]) compared to metal-ceramic SCs on non-vital teeth with fiber post (91.3%; 95% CI [90.9-91.6%], P < 0.001). SCs (all-ceramic and metal-ceramic) with fiber post had a statistically significantly higher estimated 5-year survival rate of (92.7%; 95% CI [92.4-92.9%]) than SCs made of metal-ceramic and retained by cast metal post (90.7%; 95% CI [87.4-94.0%], P < 0.001). For FDPs, the 5-year survival rate was significantly higher for FDPs on vital abutments (84.9%; 95% CI [75.9, 93.9%]) compared to FDPs retained by non-vital abutment/s (81.3%; 95% CI [80.3, 82.2%], P = 0.049) irrespective to presence, type of post, and FDPs material. The results are limited by the limited number of studies and the presence of uncontrolled confounding clinical variables. Within the limitations of the study, tooth vitality is suggested to contribute positively to the survival of SCs and FDPs.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Prosthodontics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Prosthodontists.
Références
Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray CJL, Marcenes W. Global burden of severe tooth loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2014;93:20S-28S.
Pihlgren K, Forsberg H, Sjödin L, Lundgren P, Wänman A. Changes in tooth mortality between 1990 and 2002 among adults in Västerbotten County, Sweden: influence of socioeconomic factors, general health, smoking, and dental care habits on tooth mortality. Swed Dent J 2011;35:77-88.
Gerritsen AE, Allen PF, Witter DJ, Bronkhorst EM, Creugers NH. Tooth loss and oral health-related quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2010;8:126.
Pjetursson BE, Lang NP. Prosthetic treatment planning on the basis of scientific evidence. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35(Suppl 1):72-9.
Thoma DS, Sailer I, Ioannidis A, Zwahlen M, Makarov N, Pjetursson BE. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017;28:1421-32.
Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater 2015;31:603-23.
Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Makarov NA, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: multiple-unit FDPs. Dent Mater 2015;31:624-39.
De Backer H, Van Maele G, Decock V. Long-term survival of complete crowns, fixed dental prostheses, and cantilever fixed dental prostheses with posts and cores on root canal-treated teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:229-34.
Naumann M, Schmitter M, Krastl G. Postendodontic restoration: endodontic post-and-core or no post at all? J Adhes Dent 2018;20:19-24.
Walton TR. Changes in the outcome of metal-ceramic tooth-supported single crowns and FDPs following the introduction of osseointegrated implant dentistry into a prosthodontic practice. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22:260-7.
Sedgley CM, Messer HH. Are endodontically treated teeth more brittle? J Endod 1992;18:332-5.
Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod 1989;15:512-6.
Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ, Daher T. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: the seven keys to success. Gen Dent 2009;57:596-603; quiz 4-5, 595, 679.
Sokol DJ. Effective use of current core and post concepts. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:231-4.
Fernandes AS, Dessai GS. Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:355-63.
Bolla M, Muller-Bolla M, Borg C, Lupi-Pegurier L, Laplanche O, Leforestier E. Root canal posts for the restoration of root filled teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007:Cd004623.
Peters MCRB, Poort HW, Farah JW, Craig RG. Stress analysis of a tooth restored with a post and core. J Dent Res 1983;62:760-3.
Ng Y-L, Mann V, Gulabivala K. Tooth survival following non-surgical root canal treatment: a systematic review of the literature. Int Endod J 2010;43:171-89.
Lazarski M, Walkeriii W, Flores C, Schindler W, Hargreaves K. Epidemiological evaluation of the outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment in a large cohort of insured dental patients. J Endod 2001;27:791-6.
Mentink AGB, Meeuwissen R, Käyser AF, Mulder J. Survival rate and failure characteristics of the all metal post and core restoration. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20:455-61.
Sailer I, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CHF. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II: fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18(Suppl 3):86-96.
Bona AD, Kelly JR: The clinical success of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139 Suppl:S8-S13.
Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al: PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n160.
Page MJ, Shamseer L, Tricco AC. Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting. Syst Rev 2018;7:32.
Methley AM, Campbell S, Chew-Graham C, Mcnally R, Cheraghi-Sohi S. PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14:579.
Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Oxford; 2000.
Zeng X, Zhang Y, Kwong JSW, Zhang C, Li S, Sun F, et al: The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review. J Evid Based Med 2015;8:2-10.
Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute 2011.
Dersimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177-88.
Monaco C, Llukacej A, Baldissara P, Arena A, Scotti R. Zirconia-based versus metal-based single crowns veneered with overpressing ceramic for restoration of posterior endodontically treated teeth: 5-year results of a randomized controlled clinical study. J Dent 2017;65:56-63.
Ferrari M, Vichi A, Fadda GM, Cagidiaco MC, Tay FR, Breschi L, et al: A randomized controlled trial of endodontically treated and restored premolars. J Dent Res 2012;91:S72-S78.
Skupien JA, Cenci MS, Opdam NJ, Kreulen CM, Huysmans M-C, Pereira-Cenci T. Crown vs. composite for post-retained restorations: a randomized clinical trial. J Dent 2016;48:34-9.
Bitter K, Noetzel J, Stamm O, Vaudt J, Meyer-Lueckel H, Neumann K, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of post placement on failure rate of postendodontic restorations: preliminary results of a mean period of 32 months. J Endod 2009;35:1477-82.
Sarkis-Onofre R, Jacinto RDC, Boscato N, Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T, et al. Cast metal vs. glass fibre posts: a randomized controlled trial with up to 3 years of follow up. J Dent 2014;42:582-7.
Mannocci F, Bertelli E, Sherriff M, Watson TF, Ford TRP. Three-year clinical comparison of survival of endodontically treated teeth restored with either full cast coverage or with direct composite restoration. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:297-301.
Toksavul S, Toman M. A short-term clinical evaluation of IPS Empress 2 crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:168-72.
Glazer B. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth with carbon fibre posts-a prospective study. J Can Dent Assoc 2000;66:613-8.
Creugers NH, Mentink AG, Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM. 5-year follow-up of a prospective clinical study on various types of core restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:34-9.
Reitemeier B, Hänsel K, Kastner C, Weber A, Walter MH. A prospective 10-year study of metal ceramic single crowns and fixed dental prosthesis retainers in private practice settings. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:149-55.
Sorrentino R, Leone R, Leuci S, Ausiello P, Zarone F. CAD/CAM cobalt-chromium alloy single crowns in posterior regions: 4-year prospective clinical study. J Osseointegration 2017;9:282-8.
Salido MP, Martinez-Rus F, del Rio F, Pradies G, Ozcan M, Suarez MJ. Prospective clinical study of zirconia-based posterior four-unit fixed dental prostheses: four-year follow-up. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25:403-9.
Kern M, Sasse M, Wolfart S. Ten-year outcome of three-unit fixed dental prostheses made from monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic. J Am Dent Assoc 2012;143:234-40.
Machry RV, Bergoli CD, Schwantz JK, Brondani LP, Pereira-Cenci T, Pereira GKR, Valandro LF, et al. Longevity of metal-ceramic single crowns cemented onto resin composite prosthetic cores with self-adhesive resin cement: an update of a prospective analysis with up to 106 months of follow-up. Clin Oral Investig 2023 Mar;27(3):1071-8.
Ferrari M, Sorrentino R, Juloski J, Grandini S, Carrabba M, Discepoli N, Ferrari Cagidiaco E, et al: Post-retained single crowns versus fixed dental prostheses: a 7-year prospective clinical study. J Dent Res 2017;96:1490-7.
Amaral M, Coppo PP, Rosalem CGC, Suaid FF, Guerra SMG. A 3-year retrospective evaluation of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Braz Dent J 2015;26:619-23.
Piovesan EM, Demarco FF, Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T. Survival rates of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced custom posts and cores: a 97-month study. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:633-9.
Ferrari M, Vichi A, García-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 2000;13:15b-8b.
Guldener KA, Lanzrein CL, Siegrist Guldener BE, Lang NP, Ramseier CA, Salvi GE. Long-term clinical outcomes of endodontically treated teeth restored with or without fiber post-retained single-unit restorations. J Endod 2017;43:188-93.
Schmidlin K, Schnell N, Steiner S, Salvi GE, Pjetursson B, Matuliene G, et al. Complication and failure rates in patients treated for chronic periodontitis and restored with single crowns on teeth and/or implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:550-7.
Walton TR. The up to 25-year survival and clinical performance of 2,340 high gold-based metal-ceramic single crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26:151-60.
Fabbri G, Zarone F, Dellificorelli G, Cannistraro G, De Lorenzi M, Mosca A, et al. Clinical evaluation of 860 anterior and posterior lithium disilicate restorations: retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 3 years and a maximum observational period of 6 years. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2014;34:165-77.
Signore A, Kaitsas V, Ravera G, Angiero F, Benedicenti S. Clinical evaluation of an oval-shaped prefabricated glass fiber post in endodontically treated premolars presenting an oval root canal cross-section: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Prosthodont 2011;24:255-63.
Esquivel-Upshaw JF, Young H, Jones J, Anusavice KJ. Four-year clinical performance of a lithia disilicate-based core ceramic for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2008;21:155-60.
Phang Z, Quek S, Teoh K, Tan K, Tan K. A Retrospective study on the success, survival, and incidence of complications of post-retained restorations in premolars supporting fixed dental prostheses with a mean of 7 years in function. Int J Prosthodont 2020;33:176-83.
Reitemeier B, Hänsel K, Kastner C, Walter MH. Metal-ceramic failure in noble metal crowns: 7-year results of a prospective clinical trial in private practices. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19:397-9.
Dewan H, Haroon TM, Mogla S, Gupta A, Loganathan J, Ahammed AN, et al: Assessment of failure rate of fixed partial dentures: a clinical study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2022;14:S262-s3.
Yadav M, Grewal MS, Arya A, Arora A. Comparison of fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary first premolar with mesio-occlusal-distal access restored with composite resin, fiber post, and prefabricated metal posts restored with/without full-coverage metal crowns. J Conserv Dent 2021;24:594-8.
Rezaei A, Soltani F, Vafaei F, Khoshhal M, Ayatollahi MR, Soltani N, et al. Comparison of stresses induced by fiber post, parapost and casting post in root canals by photoelasticity method. Iran Endod J 2010;5:11-6.
Bateli M, Kern M, Wolkewitz M, Strub JR, Att W. A retrospective evaluation of teeth restored with zirconia ceramic posts: 10-year results. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:1181-7.
Ying S, Chen S, Wang S, Xu L, Wang X, He F, et al. Outcome of teeth restored with CAD/CAM zirconium dioxide post-cores: a retrospective study with a follow-up period of 3-6 years. BMC Oral Health 2022;22.
Walton TR. A 10-year longitudinal study of fixed prosthodontics: clinical characteristics and outcome of single-unit metal-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:519-26.
Dimitriu B, Vârlan C, Suciu I, Vârlan V, Bodnar D. Current considerations concerning endodontically treated teeth: alteration of hard dental tissues and biomechanical properties following endodontic therapy. J Med Life 2009;2:60-5.
Awawdeh L, Hemaidat K, Al-Omari W. Higher maximal occlusal bite force in endodontically treated teeth versus vital contralateral counterparts. J Endod 2017;43:871-5.
Loewenstein WR, Rathkamp R. A study on the pressoreceptive sensibility of the tooth. J Dent Res 1955;34:287-94.
Kishen A, Asundi A. Photomechanical investigations on post endodontically rehabilitated teeth. J Biomed Opt 2002;7:262-70.
Kishen A, Kumar GV, Chen N-N. Stress-strain response in human dentine: rethinking fracture predilection in postcore restored teeth. Dent Traumatol 2004;20:90-100.
Patel A, Gutteridge DL. An in vitro investigation of cast post and partial core design. J Dent 1996;24:281-7.
Naumann M, Preuss A, Frankenberger R. Reinforcement effect of adhesively luted fiber reinforced composite versus titanium posts. Dent Mater 2007;23:138-44.
Juloski J, Radovic I, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Ferrule effect: a literature review. J Endod 2012;38:11-9.
Stankiewicz NR, Wilson PR. The ferrule effect: a literature review. Int Endod J 2002;35:575-81.
Zhu Z, Dong X-Y, He S, Pan X, Tang L. Effect of post placement on the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2015;28:475-83.
Cohen BI, Condos S, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Pilot study comparing the photoelastic stress distribution for four endodontic post systems. J Oral Rehabil 1996;23:679-85.
Pieger S, Salman A, Bidra AS. Clinical outcomes of lithium disilicate single crowns and partial fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:22-30.
Stone DL, Rosopa PJ. The advantages and limitations of using meta-analysis in human resource management research. United States: Elsevier; 2017. p. 1-7.
Delgado-Rodríguez M, Sillero-Arenas M. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicina Intensiva (English Edition) 2018;42:444-53.
Euser AM, Zoccali C, Jager KJ, Dekker FW. Cohort studies: prospective versus retrospective. Nephron Clin Pract 2009;113:c214-7.
Noordzij M, Dekker FW, Zoccali C, Jager KJ. Study designs in clinical research. Nephron Clin Pract 2009;113:c218-21.