Low back pain and biomechanical characteristics of back muscles in firefighters.

Back extension EMG emergency stiffness strength

Journal

Ergonomics
ISSN: 1366-5847
Titre abrégé: Ergonomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0373220

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Jul 2023
Historique:
pubmed: 17 7 2023
medline: 17 7 2023
entrez: 17 7 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Firefighters often experience low back pain (LBP), but their back muscle characteristics are not well studied. This study aimed to 1) compare the biomechanical characteristics of back muscles and self-reported back disabilities in frontline firefighters with and without LBP history, and 2) examine the relationships between back disability and biomechanical measurements. We recruited 42 male firefighters and assessed their perceived pain and disabilities, maximum isometric back extension strength, passive stiffness, and fatigability of the longissimus. 54.8% of the participants experienced LBP within the past year. Those indicating higher pain intensity also had greater disability as indicated by the Oswestry Disability Index. There were no significant differences in strength, stiffness or fatigability of the back muscles between firefighters with and without LBP history. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed no significant relationship between the back disability and any biomechanical or demographic measures, likely due to the high functional abilities of the participants. Approximately 50% of the firefighters who participated in the study experienced low back pain in the past 12 months. Since the pain level was mild to moderate, most of them continued to report to work. Biomechanically, there were no differences in back muscle strength, stiffness, resistance to fatigue, or left-right symmetry between firefighters with and without back pain history. Back disabilities were not related to any biomechanical measures or demographics including age and body mass index. Overall, despite experiencing some back pain, these frontline firefighters are highly functional and did not show diminished physical or neuromuscular responses.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
Approximately 50% of the firefighters who participated in the study experienced low back pain in the past 12 months. Since the pain level was mild to moderate, most of them continued to report to work. Biomechanically, there were no differences in back muscle strength, stiffness, resistance to fatigue, or left-right symmetry between firefighters with and without back pain history. Back disabilities were not related to any biomechanical measures or demographics including age and body mass index. Overall, despite experiencing some back pain, these frontline firefighters are highly functional and did not show diminished physical or neuromuscular responses.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37459607
doi: 10.1080/00140139.2023.2236821
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-10

Auteurs

Pui W Kong (PW)

Physical Education and Sports Science Academic Group, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

Tommy Y W Kan (TYW)

Physical Education and Sports Science Academic Group, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

Roslan Abdul Ghani Bin Mohamed Jamil (RAG)

Physical Education and Sports Science Academic Group, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

Wei P Teo (WP)

Physical Education and Sports Science Academic Group, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

Jing W Pan (JW)

Physical Education and Sports Science Academic Group, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

Noor Hafiz Abd Halim (N)

Responder Performance Centre, Civil Defence Academy, Singapore Civil Defence Force, Singapore.

Hasan Kuddoos Abu Bakar Maricar (H)

Responder Performance Centre, Civil Defence Academy, Singapore Civil Defence Force, Singapore.

David Hostler (D)

Center for Research and Education in Special Environments, Department of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, University at Buffalo, USA.

Classifications MeSH