Effectiveness of previous infection-induced and vaccine-induced protection against hospitalisation due to omicron BA subvariants in older adults: a test-negative, case-control study in Quebec, Canada.


Journal

The lancet. Healthy longevity
ISSN: 2666-7568
Titre abrégé: Lancet Healthy Longev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101773309

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2023
Historique:
received: 06 01 2023
revised: 23 05 2023
accepted: 24 05 2023
medline: 7 8 2023
pubmed: 18 7 2023
entrez: 17 7 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Older adults (aged ≥60 years) were prioritised for COVID-19 booster vaccination due to severe outcome risk, but the risk for this group is also affected by previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination. We estimated vaccine effectiveness against omicron-associated hospitalisation in older adults by previously documented infection, time since last immunological event, and age group. This was a population-based test-negative case-control study done in Quebec, Canada, during BA.1 dominant (December, 2021, to March, 2022), BA.2 dominant (April to June, 2022), and BA.4/5 dominant (July to November, 2022) periods using provincial laboratory, immunisation, hospitalisation, and chronic disease surveillance databases. We included older adults (aged ≥60 years) with symptoms associated with COVID-19 who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 in acute-care hospitals. Cases were defined as patients who were hospitalised for COVID-19 within 14 days after testing positive; controls were patients who tested negative. Analyses spanned 3-14 months after last vaccine dose or previous infection. Logistic regression models compared COVID-19 hospitalisation risk by mRNA vaccine dose and previous infection versus unvaccinated and infection-naive participants. Between Dec 26, 2021, and Nov 5, 2022, we included 174 819 specimens (82 870 [47·4%] from men and 91 949 [52·6%] from women; from 8455 cases and 166 364 controls), taken from 2951 cases and 48 724 controls in the BA.1 period; 1897 cases and 41 702 controls in the BA.2 period; and 3607 cases and 75 938 controls in the BA.4/5 period. In participants who were infection naive, vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation improved with dose number, consistent with a shorter median time since last dose, but decreased with more recent omicron subvariants. Four-dose vaccine effectiveness was 96% (95% CI 93-98) during the BA.1 period, 84% (81-87) during the BA.2 period, and 68% (63-72) during the BA.4/5 period. Regardless of dose number (two to five doses) or timing since previous infection, hybrid protection was more than 90%, persisted for at least 6-8 months, and did not decline with age. Older adults with both previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and two or more vaccine doses appear to be well protected for a prolonged period against hospitalisation due to omicron subvariants, including BA.4/5. Ensuring that older adults who are infection naive remain up to date with vaccination might reduce COVID-19 hospitalisations most efficiently. Ministère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux du Québec. For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Older adults (aged ≥60 years) were prioritised for COVID-19 booster vaccination due to severe outcome risk, but the risk for this group is also affected by previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination. We estimated vaccine effectiveness against omicron-associated hospitalisation in older adults by previously documented infection, time since last immunological event, and age group.
METHODS
This was a population-based test-negative case-control study done in Quebec, Canada, during BA.1 dominant (December, 2021, to March, 2022), BA.2 dominant (April to June, 2022), and BA.4/5 dominant (July to November, 2022) periods using provincial laboratory, immunisation, hospitalisation, and chronic disease surveillance databases. We included older adults (aged ≥60 years) with symptoms associated with COVID-19 who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 in acute-care hospitals. Cases were defined as patients who were hospitalised for COVID-19 within 14 days after testing positive; controls were patients who tested negative. Analyses spanned 3-14 months after last vaccine dose or previous infection. Logistic regression models compared COVID-19 hospitalisation risk by mRNA vaccine dose and previous infection versus unvaccinated and infection-naive participants.
FINDINGS
Between Dec 26, 2021, and Nov 5, 2022, we included 174 819 specimens (82 870 [47·4%] from men and 91 949 [52·6%] from women; from 8455 cases and 166 364 controls), taken from 2951 cases and 48 724 controls in the BA.1 period; 1897 cases and 41 702 controls in the BA.2 period; and 3607 cases and 75 938 controls in the BA.4/5 period. In participants who were infection naive, vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation improved with dose number, consistent with a shorter median time since last dose, but decreased with more recent omicron subvariants. Four-dose vaccine effectiveness was 96% (95% CI 93-98) during the BA.1 period, 84% (81-87) during the BA.2 period, and 68% (63-72) during the BA.4/5 period. Regardless of dose number (two to five doses) or timing since previous infection, hybrid protection was more than 90%, persisted for at least 6-8 months, and did not decline with age.
INTERPRETATION
Older adults with both previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and two or more vaccine doses appear to be well protected for a prolonged period against hospitalisation due to omicron subvariants, including BA.4/5. Ensuring that older adults who are infection naive remain up to date with vaccination might reduce COVID-19 hospitalisations most efficiently.
FUNDING
Ministère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux du Québec.
TRANSLATION
For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37459879
pii: S2666-7568(23)00099-5
doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(23)00099-5
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Vaccines 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e409-e420

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of interests SC, MO, and GDS report financial support to their institution from Ministère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux du Québec, during the conduct of the study. DT is supported by a research career award from the Fonds de recherche du Québec – Santé. JF reports grants from Ministère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux du Québec, grants and receipt of sequencing consumables from the Public Health Agency of Canada, and grants from Génome Canada, unrelated to the current work. DMS reports grants paid to her institution and unrelated to the current work from the Public Health Agency of Canada, Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and British Columbia Centre for Disease Control Foundation for Public Health. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Auteurs

Sara Carazo (S)

Biological Risks Unit, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada; Social and Preventive Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada. Electronic address: sara.carazo@inspq.qc.ca.

Danuta M Skowronski (DM)

Communicable Diseases and Immunization Services, British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Marc Brisson (M)

Social and Preventive Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec, QC, Canada.

Chantal Sauvageau (C)

Biological Risks Unit, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada; Social and Preventive Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec, QC, Canada.

Nicholas Brousseau (N)

Biological Risks Unit, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada; Social and Preventive Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec, QC, Canada.

Judith Fafard (J)

Laboratoire de Santé Publique du Québec, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, QC, Canada.

Rodica Gilca (R)

Biological Risks Unit, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada; Social and Preventive Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec, QC, Canada.

Denis Talbot (D)

Social and Preventive Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec, QC, Canada.

Manale Ouakki (M)

Biological Risks Unit, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada.

Yossi Febriani (Y)

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec, QC, Canada.

Geneviève Deceuninck (G)

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec, QC, Canada.

Philippe De Wals (P)

Biological Risks Unit, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada; Social and Preventive Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec, QC, Canada.

Gaston De Serres (G)

Biological Risks Unit, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada; Social and Preventive Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec, QC, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH