Evaluation of CD44 Expression in Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: An Institutional Study.
cancer
gleason’s grade
metastasis
targeted therapy
trans urethral resection of prostate (turp)
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
accepted:
16
06
2023
medline:
18
7
2023
pubmed:
18
7
2023
entrez:
18
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Prostate adenocarcinoma is the second-most common cause of cancer. Globally, many cancer-related deaths among men were noted due to prostate adenocarcinoma. CD44 plays a key role in mediating cell-to-cell and cell-to-matrix interaction, which further helps to maintain the integrity of tissue and also inhibits tumor metastasis. Cross-sectional study was done on chips from transurethral resections of the prostate (TURP) and prostatic core biopsy specimens. All specimens with clinically diagnosed and histopathologically confirmed prostatic adenocarcinoma were included in the study. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), recurrent cases, and patients who had undergone radiotherapy/ chemotherapy prior to biopsy were excluded from the study. The sample size for the current study was 57 with an 8% prevalence value, 95% confidence interval, and 8% absolute error. Immunoreaction to CD44 antibody is membranous and was evaluated by calculating positively stained cell percentage and staining intensity. These two parameters were added to obtain a final score; a score of 0-3 was considered as negative, and a score of 4-6 was regarded as positive. A statistically significant difference was only found between Gleason grade (p<0.001), clinical staging (p<0.002), nodal metastasis (p<0.015), and distant metastasis (p<0.020) with CD44 positive expression. The rest of the parameters like PSA (p=0.642) and age (p=0.051) did not correlate with CD44-positive expression. Out of 29 cases with positive CD44 expression, 100% positivity was seen in Gleason's grades 1, 2, and 3. This indicates that CD44 expression showed lesser positivity in poorly differentiated carcinoma. CD44 positivity was seen in 83.3% in the T2 stage. An inverse relationship between tumor staging and CD44 expression was observed with positive CD44 expression in lower tumor staging which implies loss of CD44 expression was associated with greater tumor aggressiveness. Lymph node metastasis cases showed more negative CD44 expression (59.5%) and the same was noted in patients without distant metastasis, that is in 61% of the subjects. Conclusion: Cells tend to lose the ability of CD44 expression as they progress from well-differentiated adenocarcinoma to poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. CD44 expression suggests that the tumor is in a well-differentiated and gland-forming state as compared to Gleason's grade. Loss of CD44 expression suggests tumor aggressiveness. Thus, the upregulation of CD44 expression can be considered as a potential target for targeted therapy. As many targeted and gene therapies are in clinical trials, large-scale multicentered studies are needed for a better understanding of the clinical course of the disease.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37461792
doi: 10.7759/cureus.40510
pmc: PMC10350293
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e40510Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023, Damarasingu et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Int J Cancer. 1999 Oct 22;84(5):478-83
pubmed: 10502724
Cancer Res. 1999 May 15;59(10):2329-31
pubmed: 10344738
Pol J Pathol. 2014 Dec;65(4):291-5
pubmed: 25693083
Sci Rep. 2021 May 27;11(1):11210
pubmed: 34045601
Biomolecules. 2021 Dec 09;11(12):
pubmed: 34944493
J Hematol Oncol. 2018 May 10;11(1):64
pubmed: 29747682
Am J Transl Res. 2010 Sep 12;3(1):1-7
pubmed: 21139802
Mutat Res. 1997 Apr;386(2):107-18
pubmed: 9113112
Exp Hematol Oncol. 2020 Dec 10;9(1):36
pubmed: 33303029
Int J Cancer. 1999 Jan 29;80(3):439-43
pubmed: 9935187
Oncotarget. 2018 Jul 20;9(56):30905-30918
pubmed: 30112117
J Cancer. 2019 Oct 15;10(24):5915-5925
pubmed: 31762801
Cancer. 1996 Oct 1;78(7):1461-9
pubmed: 8839552
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2017 Mar 07;5:18
pubmed: 28326306
Cancer Res. 1998 Jun 1;58(11):2350-2
pubmed: 9622073
Oncotarget. 2017 May 11;8(39):65143-65151
pubmed: 29029419
Cell Commun Signal. 2019 Jul 22;17(1):80
pubmed: 31331331
Clin Cancer Res. 1997 May;3(5):805-15
pubmed: 9815753
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
Lab Invest. 2000 Aug;80(8):1291-8
pubmed: 10950120
Cells. 2019 Mar 30;8(4):
pubmed: 30935014