Correction, uncertainty, and anchoring effects.
Journal
The Behavioral and brain sciences
ISSN: 1469-1825
Titre abrégé: Behav Brain Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7808666
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 07 2023
18 07 2023
Historique:
medline:
19
7
2023
pubmed:
18
7
2023
entrez:
18
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We compare the predictions of two important proposals made by De Neys to findings in the anchoring effect literature. Evidence for an anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic supports his proposal that system 1 and system 2 are non-exclusive. The relationship between psychophysical noise and anchoring effects, however, challenges his proposal that epistemic uncertainty determines the involvement of system 2 corrective processes in judgment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37462172
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X2200303X
pii: S0140525X2200303X
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Comment
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e129Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentOn
Type : CommentIn