Correction, uncertainty, and anchoring effects.


Journal

The Behavioral and brain sciences
ISSN: 1469-1825
Titre abrégé: Behav Brain Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7808666

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 07 2023
Historique:
medline: 19 7 2023
pubmed: 18 7 2023
entrez: 18 7 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

We compare the predictions of two important proposals made by De Neys to findings in the anchoring effect literature. Evidence for an anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic supports his proposal that system 1 and system 2 are non-exclusive. The relationship between psychophysical noise and anchoring effects, however, challenges his proposal that epistemic uncertainty determines the involvement of system 2 corrective processes in judgment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37462172
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X2200303X
pii: S0140525X2200303X
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Comment

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e129

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentOn
Type : CommentIn

Auteurs

Chang-Yuan Lee (CY)

Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada changyuan.lee@utoronto.ca.

Carey K Morewedge (CK)

Questrom School of Business, Boston University, Boston, MA, USAmorewedg@bu.eduhttps://www.bu.edu/questrom/profile/carey-morewedge/.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH