Categorizing judgments as likely to be selected by intuition or deliberation.


Journal

The Behavioral and brain sciences
ISSN: 1469-1825
Titre abrégé: Behav Brain Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7808666

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 07 2023
Historique:
medline: 19 7 2023
pubmed: 18 7 2023
entrez: 18 7 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

De Neys argues against the exclusivity assumption: That many judgments are exclusively selected by intuition or deliberation. But this is an excessively strong formulation of the exclusivity assumption. We should aim to develop weaker, more plausible formulations that identify which judgments are likely to be selected by intuition or deliberation. This is necessary for empirical comparisons of intuition and deliberation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37462194
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X22002886
pii: S0140525X22002886
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Comment

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e118

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentOn
Type : CommentIn

Auteurs

Aliya R Dewey (AR)

Department of Philosophy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA aliyardewey@gmail.comhttps://aliyadewey.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH