Categorizing judgments as likely to be selected by intuition or deliberation.
Journal
The Behavioral and brain sciences
ISSN: 1469-1825
Titre abrégé: Behav Brain Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7808666
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 07 2023
18 07 2023
Historique:
medline:
19
7
2023
pubmed:
18
7
2023
entrez:
18
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
De Neys argues against the exclusivity assumption: That many judgments are exclusively selected by intuition or deliberation. But this is an excessively strong formulation of the exclusivity assumption. We should aim to develop weaker, more plausible formulations that identify which judgments are likely to be selected by intuition or deliberation. This is necessary for empirical comparisons of intuition and deliberation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37462194
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X22002886
pii: S0140525X22002886
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Comment
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e118Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentOn
Type : CommentIn