Mid-term clinical and echocardiographic results of the INSPIRIS RESILIA aortic valve: a retrospective comparison to the Magna Ease.

INSPIRIS RESILIA Magna Ease Patient–prosthesis mismatch Structural valve deterioration Surgical aortic valve replacement Transvalvular gradient

Journal

Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery
ISSN: 2753-670X
Titre abrégé: Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918540787006676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Jul 2023
Historique:
received: 15 03 2023
revised: 12 06 2023
accepted: 17 07 2023
medline: 18 7 2023
pubmed: 18 7 2023
entrez: 18 7 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The INSPIRIS aortic valve combines the RESILIA proprietary tissue preservation process and an expandable stent frame to benefit future transcatheter valve-in-valve procedures. As the INSPIRIS valve became commercially available in 2017, mid-term outcome reports are scarce. We aimed to evaluate mid-term safety and echocardiographic performance of the INSPIRIS valve in comparison to its predecessor, the Carpentier Edwards Perimount Magna Ease (ME). This study was a retrospective single-centre study. Clinical results included early postoperative outcomes, mid-term mortality and readmission for cardiovascular cause or stroke. Echocardiographic follow-up (FU) was performed at discharge and 1-3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Clinical end point analyses were accomplished with a propensity score matching analysis and FU echocardiographic data comparisons using pairwise analyses and linear mixed-effect models. We included 953 patients who received an INSPIRIS (n = 488) or ME (n = 463) bioprosthesis between January 2018 and July 2021. In the matched population (n = 217 per group), no significant difference in short-term outcomes was observed, survival was similar at 30 months (INSPIRIS: 94% vs ME: 91%, P = 0.89), but freedom from readmission was higher in the INSPIRIS group (94% vs 86%, P = 0.014). INSPIRIS valves had a lower gradient at discharge (∼10 vs 14 mmHg, P < 0.001), 1-3 months (∼10 vs 12 mmHg, P < 0.001) and 24 months (∼11 vs 17 mmHg, P < 0.001) in paired analyses and significantly lower evolution of mean transvalvular gradients compared to ME. This study represents the largest comparative evaluation of the INSPIRIS to the ME valves, which demonstrated safe clinical outcomes and favourable haemodynamic performance at 2 years. Long-term FU is underway.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37462610
pii: 7225859
doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivad117
pmc: PMC10386877
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : CIHR
Pays : Canada

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.

Références

Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Jan;109(1):86-92
pubmed: 31336064
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018 Apr 1;26(4):539-544
pubmed: 29596693
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Mar 25;16(1):51
pubmed: 33766089
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Jan;149(1):340-5
pubmed: 25439467
Ann Thorac Surg. 2023 Jun;115(6):1429-1436
pubmed: 35065065
Eur Heart J. 2021 May 14;42(19):1825-1857
pubmed: 33871579
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Jan 29;59(2):434-441
pubmed: 33141188
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 May 27;15(1):119
pubmed: 32460798
Heart Surg Forum. 2021 Nov 29;24(6):E598-E962
pubmed: 34962472
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Aug;162(2):539-547.e1
pubmed: 32037245
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Sep 27;14(18):1978-1991
pubmed: 34556271
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Aug 4;76(5):489-499
pubmed: 32731926
J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2020;12(3):222-226
pubmed: 33123329
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Sep 01;52(3):432-439
pubmed: 28605428
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Oct 20;76(16):1848-1859
pubmed: 33059830
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Aug;48(2):180-93
pubmed: 25971435
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jan 1;22(1):11-20
pubmed: 32995865
Multivariate Behav Res. 2011 May;46(3):399-424
pubmed: 21818162
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Jan 4;59(1):54-64
pubmed: 33021620
J Artif Organs. 2022 Dec;25(4):323-328
pubmed: 35129732
Adv Ther. 2021 May;38(5):2435-2446
pubmed: 33788152

Auteurs

Jérémy Bernard (J)

Cardiology Division, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec - Université Laval/Quebec Heart and Lung Institute - Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.

Gabriel Georges (G)

Cardiac Surgery Division, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec - Université Laval/Quebec Heart and Lung Institute - Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.

Sébastien Hecht (S)

Cardiology Division, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec - Université Laval/Quebec Heart and Lung Institute - Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.

Philippe Pibarot (P)

Cardiology Division, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec - Université Laval/Quebec Heart and Lung Institute - Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.

Marie-Annick Clavel (MA)

Cardiology Division, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec - Université Laval/Quebec Heart and Lung Institute - Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.

Shervin Babaki (S)

Research Division, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec - Université Laval/Quebec Heart and Lung Institute - Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.

Dimitri Kalavrouziotis (D)

Cardiac Surgery Division, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec - Université Laval/Quebec Heart and Lung Institute - Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.

Siamak Mohammadi (S)

Cardiac Surgery Division, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec - Université Laval/Quebec Heart and Lung Institute - Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.

Classifications MeSH