Inter-aural separation during hearing by bilateral bone conduction stimulation.

Bone conduction Cross-head transmission Cross-talk cancellation Ear canal sound pressure

Journal

Hearing research
ISSN: 1878-5891
Titre abrégé: Hear Res
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7900445

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 09 2023
Historique:
received: 27 04 2023
revised: 27 06 2023
accepted: 08 07 2023
medline: 21 8 2023
pubmed: 18 7 2023
entrez: 18 7 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Cross-head transmission inherent in bone conduction (BC) hearing is one of the most important factors that limit the performance of BC binaural hearing compared to air conduction (AC) binaural hearing. In AC, cross-head transmission is imperceptible leading to a clear understanding of the nature and position of the sound source(s). In this study, the prominence of cross-head transmission in BC hearing is addressed using the fact that ipsilateral cochlear excitation can be canceled by controlled bilateral BC stimulation. A cancellation experiment was conducted on twenty participants with normal hearing at thirteen third-octave frequencies between 250 and 4000 Hz. Both stationary and transient BC stimulation at the mastoid was used. The technique employed multiple stages of masking enabling adjustments of the stimulation level and phase until the tones got canceled in the ipsilateral ear. In addition, the ear canal sound pressure was obtained for ipsilateral and contralateral BC stimulation in isolation, and with bilateral BC stimulation at perceptual cancellation. The inter-aural level differences of both the types of stimulations were found to be the same. Crosstalk was found to be the lowest around 2 kHz and the highest around 1 kHz. The unwrapped inter-aural phase difference from stationary signal cancellation showed an overall increase with frequency starting at around no difference (35°) at 250 Hz to reach 607° at 4 kHz. Cycle-adjusted inter-aural time difference was very low (61 µs) at 250 Hz and increased to 1.1 ms at 800 Hz before falling to 0.6 ms at 4 kHz. It was also found that the ear canal sound pressure was not cancelled at the same phase as the sound in the cochlea.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37463528
pii: S0378-5955(23)00164-8
doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2023.108852
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

108852

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Auteurs

Sudeep Surendran (S)

Division of Sensory Organs and Communication (SOK), Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (BKV), Campus US, Linköping University, Linköping 581 85, Sweden. Electronic address: sudeep.surendran@liu.se.

Stefan Stenfelt (S)

Division of Sensory Organs and Communication (SOK), Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (BKV), Campus US, Linköping University, Linköping 581 85, Sweden.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH