Association of sexual dysfunction according to
DSM-5
population-based study
prevalence
sexual dysfunction
Journal
Sexual medicine
ISSN: 2050-1161
Titre abrégé: Sex Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101631053
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
31
03
2023
revised:
30
05
2023
accepted:
07
06
2023
medline:
19
7
2023
pubmed:
19
7
2023
entrez:
19
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Sexual dysfunction frequencies and diagnostic indicators among older populations are relevant for public health measures, but evidence from large population-based studies is still scarce. To determine sexual dysfunction frequencies for women and men according to the We determined sexual dysfunction frequencies according to the Outcomes included sexual dysfunction frequencies - specifically, sexual difficulties experienced frequently or more often, over at least six months in the last year, causing severe or very severe distress, and not associated with physical health or relationship problems - and items on quality/avoidance of and discomfort during sex. Participants' median age was 62.0 years (IQR, 14) and 51.1% were women. The frequency of sexual dysfunction according to the Results suggest that sexual dysfunction caused by other than physical health or relationship factors is important to consider in this population. In addition, the avoidance of, perceived quality of, and discomfort during sex serve as valuable diagnostic indicators for the presence of sexual dysfunction. This study draws on robust data from a large sample to give valuable insight on the frequency of sexual difficulties and dysfunctions as defined by The study provides estimates for
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Sexual dysfunction frequencies and diagnostic indicators among older populations are relevant for public health measures, but evidence from large population-based studies is still scarce.
Aim
UNASSIGNED
To determine sexual dysfunction frequencies for women and men according to the
Methods
UNASSIGNED
We determined sexual dysfunction frequencies according to the
Outcomes
UNASSIGNED
Outcomes included sexual dysfunction frequencies - specifically, sexual difficulties experienced frequently or more often, over at least six months in the last year, causing severe or very severe distress, and not associated with physical health or relationship problems - and items on quality/avoidance of and discomfort during sex.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Participants' median age was 62.0 years (IQR, 14) and 51.1% were women. The frequency of sexual dysfunction according to the
Clinical Implications
UNASSIGNED
Results suggest that sexual dysfunction caused by other than physical health or relationship factors is important to consider in this population. In addition, the avoidance of, perceived quality of, and discomfort during sex serve as valuable diagnostic indicators for the presence of sexual dysfunction.
Strengths and Limitations
UNASSIGNED
This study draws on robust data from a large sample to give valuable insight on the frequency of sexual difficulties and dysfunctions as defined by
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
The study provides estimates for
Identifiants
pubmed: 37465531
doi: 10.1093/sexmed/qfad037
pii: qfad037
pmc: PMC10350482
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
qfad037Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society of Sexual Medicine.
Références
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Apr;211:26-32
pubmed: 28178575
J Sex Med. 2018 Nov;15(11):1591-1599
pubmed: 30327264
J Sex Med. 2010 Jun;7(6):1998-2014
pubmed: 20929516
Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Feb;35(2):169-181
pubmed: 31705407
PLoS Med. 2006 Apr;3(4):e178
pubmed: 16597176
J Sex Med. 2012 Aug;9(8):2027-39
pubmed: 22788382
Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Feb;46(2):465-473
pubmed: 27757732
J Sex Med. 2014 Feb;11(2):364-73
pubmed: 24251541
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020 Sep 25;117(39):653-658
pubmed: 33357346
J Sex Res. 2016 Oct;53(8):955-967
pubmed: 26605494
J Sex Med. 2009 Oct;6(10):2690-7
pubmed: 19817981
JAMA. 1999 Feb 10;281(6):537-44
pubmed: 10022110
BMJ. 2003 Jan 4;326(7379):45-7
pubmed: 12511464