Procedural fairness in ethnic-cultural decision-making: fostering social cohesion by incorporating minority and majority perspectives.
collective model
ethnic-cultural minority groups
minority collective identity
moral obligations
procedural fairness
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
22
08
2022
accepted:
07
06
2023
medline:
20
7
2023
pubmed:
20
7
2023
entrez:
20
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Recent research describes how procedural fairness can be used to resolve issues related to ethnic-cultural matters. The central finding in this strand of literature is that when minority members experience procedurally fair treatment by societal actors regarding ethnic-cultural issues, this will lead to a range of outcomes that are beneficial for social cohesion. Although these results are promising, it remains yet to be shown that such group-specific treatment fairness does not hamper social cohesion by inciting misapprehension among members of non-recipient groups. Therefore, the present study set out to examine two central questions. First, how would
Identifiants
pubmed: 37469901
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1025153
pmc: PMC10353736
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1025153Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Dierckx, Van Hiel, Valcke and van den Bos.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Pers. 2019 Apr;87(2):212-230
pubmed: 29577298
Int J Psychol. 2016 Jun;51(3):163-76
pubmed: 25683956
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Jun;102(6):867-889
pubmed: 28277729
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Mar;13(2):149-154
pubmed: 29928846
Int J Equity Health. 2013 Oct 28;12:87
pubmed: 24165541
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Jun;122(6):1075-1097
pubmed: 34516185
J Appl Psychol. 2004 Aug;89(4):633-46
pubmed: 15327350
Psychol Bull. 1996 Sep;120(2):189-208
pubmed: 8831296
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Aug;101(2):337-53
pubmed: 21534702
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Nov;87(5):649-64
pubmed: 15535777
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Dec;19(6):1057-64
pubmed: 22798023
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Jul;95(1):144-65
pubmed: 18605857
Psychol Sci. 2014 Jun;25(6):1189-97
pubmed: 24699846