Selected bacteria in sheep stool depending on breed and physiology state.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 07 2023
20 07 2023
Historique:
received:
17
02
2023
accepted:
14
07
2023
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
21
7
2023
entrez:
20
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
One of the important factors influencing the microbial community of ruminants, besides environment or diet, are breed and physiology. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess these changes in the levels of basic microbial phyla and families. For this study, qPCR analysis was performed to determine the level of bacteria (Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria clusters and Clostridiaceae, Lactobacillaceae families) in the feces of ewes of three native Polish sheep breeds (Polish Lowland Sheep (PON), Świniarka Sheep (SW), and synthetic line BCP) at different physiological periods (conception, early pregnancy, lambing, end of lactation). The animals were kept in the same environment and were at the same age (2-years). The results showed a significant effect of both breed (p = 0.038) and physiological period (p < 0.05, p < 0.01) on the levels of bacteria analyzed. The breed showed differences across physiological periods. The influence of the race factor was noted primarily between the BCP synthetic line and the other two breeds (differences in terms of all analyzed clusters and families except Actinobacteria phyla). In the case of SW and PON, however, the observed differences were only at the level of Proteobacteria cluster and Clostridiaceae family. On the other hand, the early pregnant and lambing periods were the most microbiologically diverse in terms of the analyzed clusters and families of bacteria.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37474553
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38785-4
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-38785-4
pmc: PMC10359392
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
11739Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Microbiome. 2019 Jun 13;7(1):92
pubmed: 31196178
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Jun;67(6):2578-85
pubmed: 11375166
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 10;11(1):23801
pubmed: 34893656
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Oct;71(10):6193-8
pubmed: 16204538
Anim Sci J. 2017 May;88(5):790-797
pubmed: 27696632
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Nov;75(22):7115-24
pubmed: 19783747
Poult Sci. 2004 Jul;83(7):1093-8
pubmed: 15285498
J Microbiol Methods. 2011 Sep;86(3):351-6
pubmed: 21704084
Front Microbiol. 2019 Jul 10;10:1547
pubmed: 31354656
Front Microbiol. 2015 Oct 12;6:1060
pubmed: 26528248
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2019 Jan 29;4(1):
pubmed: 30700019
J Appl Microbiol. 2014 Feb;116(2):245-57
pubmed: 24279326
BMC Vet Res. 2020 Jul 23;16(1):254
pubmed: 32703277
Microb Ecol. 2019 Feb;77(2):523-536
pubmed: 30033500
AMB Express. 2017 Dec;7(1):75
pubmed: 28378284
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jun 29;11(7):
pubmed: 34209653
BMC Vet Res. 2022 Mar 18;18(1):107
pubmed: 35303874
Microorganisms. 2020 Dec 15;8(12):
pubmed: 33333813
Animals (Basel). 2022 Jun 09;12(12):
pubmed: 35739847
Sci Rep. 2015 Oct 09;5:14567
pubmed: 26449758
Science. 2013 Mar 1;339(6123):1084-8
pubmed: 23328391
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2002;35(3):251-5
pubmed: 12180951
Anim Health Res Rev. 2020 Jun;21(1):3-14
pubmed: 31918781
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Sep;79(18):5763-73
pubmed: 23872567
BMC Microbiol. 2008 Jul 24;8:125
pubmed: 18652685
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2017 Jan 19;8:8
pubmed: 28116074
J Anim Sci. 2022 Sep 1;100(9):
pubmed: 35953151
J Appl Microbiol. 2016 May;120(5):1382-9
pubmed: 26784648
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 23;9(1):19620
pubmed: 31873173
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Oct;99(10):7733-7743
pubmed: 27522435
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Oct;76(19):6338-50
pubmed: 20709849
Microb Biotechnol. 2017 May;10(3):541-554
pubmed: 28165194
Animals (Basel). 2020 Oct 16;10(10):
pubmed: 33081312
Cell. 2012 Aug 3;150(3):470-80
pubmed: 22863002
Microbiome. 2020 Sep 24;8(1):138
pubmed: 32972462