Timing of Allocentric and Egocentric Spatial Processing in Human Intracranial EEG.
Allocentric
Egocentric
High-frequency gamma activity
Intracranial EEG
Reference frames
Spatial judgment
Journal
Brain topography
ISSN: 1573-6792
Titre abrégé: Brain Topogr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8903034
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2023
11 2023
Historique:
received:
08
12
2022
accepted:
10
07
2023
medline:
27
9
2023
pubmed:
21
7
2023
entrez:
20
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Spatial reference frames (RFs) play a key role in spatial cognition, especially in perception, spatial memory, and navigation. There are two main types of RFs: egocentric (self-centered) and allocentric (object-centered). Although many fMRI studies examined the neural correlates of egocentric and allocentric RFs, they could not sample the fast temporal dynamics of the underlying cognitive processes. Therefore, the interaction and timing between these two RFs remain unclear. Taking advantage of the high temporal resolution of intracranial EEG (iEEG), we aimed to determine the timing of egocentric and allocentric information processing and describe the brain areas involved. We recorded iEEG and analyzed broad gamma activity (50-150 Hz) in 37 epilepsy patients performing a spatial judgment task in a three-dimensional circular virtual arena. We found overlapping activation for egocentric and allocentric RFs in many brain regions, with several additional egocentric- and allocentric-selective areas. In contrast to the egocentric responses, the allocentric responses peaked later than the control ones in frontal regions with overlapping selectivity. Also, across several egocentric or allocentric selective areas, the egocentric selectivity appeared earlier than the allocentric one. We identified the maximum number of egocentric-selective channels in the medial occipito-temporal region and allocentric-selective channels around the intraparietal sulcus in the parietal cortex. Our findings favor the hypothesis that egocentric spatial coding is a more primary process, and allocentric representations may be derived from egocentric ones. They also broaden the dominant view of the dorsal and ventral streams supporting egocentric and allocentric space coding, respectively.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37474691
doi: 10.1007/s10548-023-00989-2
pii: 10.1007/s10548-023-00989-2
pmc: PMC10522529
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
870-889Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Neuroscientist. 2012 Oct;18(5):502-15
pubmed: 21636849
Eur J Neurosci. 2006 Oct;24(8):2406-14
pubmed: 17074058
Cortex. 2005 Apr;41(2):133-43
pubmed: 15714896
J Neurosci. 2010 Jan 6;30(1):148-60
pubmed: 20053897
J Neurosci. 2013 Jan 23;33(4):1331-6a
pubmed: 23345209
Physiol Rev. 2008 Jan;88(1):37-57
pubmed: 18195082
Neuropsychology. 2004 Jul;18(3):450-61
pubmed: 15291723
Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Jun;34(6):1357-70
pubmed: 22287281
Hippocampus. 2004;14(7):826-35
pubmed: 15382253
Brain. 2000 Sep;123 ( Pt 9):1903-12
pubmed: 10960054
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Feb 12;46(3):902-14
pubmed: 18206963
Science. 2005 Aug 5;309(5736):951-4
pubmed: 16081741
Behav Neurosci. 2010 Aug;124(4):532-40
pubmed: 20695652
Neuroimage. 2021 Sep;238:118264
pubmed: 34129948
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Aug 10;6:230
pubmed: 22907997
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):195-203
pubmed: 30734206
Exp Brain Res. 2000 Jul;133(2):156-64
pubmed: 10968216
J Anat. 2005 Jul;207(1):3-17
pubmed: 16011542
Neuroimage. 2002 Apr;15(4):870-8
pubmed: 11906227
Psychol Rev. 2007 Apr;114(2):340-75
pubmed: 17500630
Cortex. 2018 Jan;98:8-27
pubmed: 27890325
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Dec 09;9:648
pubmed: 26696861
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Mar;3(3):201-15
pubmed: 11994752
Eur J Neurosci. 2021 Jun;53(11):3672-3687
pubmed: 33880818
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2010 May;27(3):277-303
pubmed: 21058077
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Jun;7(6):673-7
pubmed: 15146191
J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Nov;16(9):1517-35
pubmed: 15601516
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Jun;26(6):2863-81
pubmed: 26984895
Hippocampus. 2007;17(8):618-26
pubmed: 17492693
Trends Neurosci. 1992 Jan;15(1):20-5
pubmed: 1374953
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011 Apr;12(4):217-30
pubmed: 21415848
J Neurosci. 2009 Oct 28;29(43):13613-20
pubmed: 19864573
Neurosci Res. 2005 Mar;51(3):221-9
pubmed: 15710485
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2010 Jan;93(1):46-55
pubmed: 19683063
Eur J Neurosci. 2021 Dec;54(12):8283-8307
pubmed: 33497490
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Mar 20;8:150
pubmed: 24688464
J Biomed Opt. 2015 Jan;20(1):016003
pubmed: 25562501
Science. 1998 May 8;280(5365):921-4
pubmed: 9572740
Curr Biol. 2016 Apr 25;26(8):1104-9
pubmed: 27020742
Psychol Res. 2016 Mar;80(2):259-72
pubmed: 25805435
Cortex. 2014 Nov;60:34-51
pubmed: 25017647
Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 15;85 Pt 2:711-20
pubmed: 24018305
Brain Res. 2007 Mar 16;1137(1):92-103
pubmed: 17258693
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Oct;206(2):109-20
pubmed: 20186405
J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 May;32(5):847-861
pubmed: 31933430
Neuroreport. 1999 Nov 26;10(17):3633-7
pubmed: 10619657
Physiol Res. 2020 Nov 16;69(5):787-801
pubmed: 32901499
Neuroscience. 2019 Jun 15;409:235-252
pubmed: 31004694
Prog Brain Res. 2004;144:131-44
pubmed: 14650845
Hippocampus. 2012 Jun;22(6):1313-24
pubmed: 21805527
Brain Topogr. 2021 Mar;34(2):207-220
pubmed: 33484379
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Jul;29(7):1292-1301
pubmed: 28195522
Neurophysiol Clin. 2014 Jan;44(1):33-40
pubmed: 24502903
Neuroimage. 2005 Apr 15;25(3):668-83
pubmed: 15808968
Brain Topogr. 2015 Jan;28(1):172-83
pubmed: 24970691
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Oct 09;14:561399
pubmed: 33192393
Eur J Neurosci. 2007 Feb;25(3):890-9
pubmed: 17298595
Prog Neurobiol. 2012 Sep;98(3):279-301
pubmed: 22750156
Brain. 2010 Jan;133(Pt 1):46-59
pubmed: 19773355
Neuroreport. 2004 Jan 19;15(1):135-40
pubmed: 15106845
Hippocampus. 2012 Apr;22(4):842-52
pubmed: 21584904
Neuron. 2021 Sep 1;109(17):2781-2796.e10
pubmed: 34265253
Front Hum Neurosci. 2010 Nov 11;4:195
pubmed: 21267419
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 May 27;8:157
pubmed: 24904329
Neuroimage. 2016 May 15;132:417-424
pubmed: 26931815