Can the performance of pyrethroid-chlorfenapyr nets be reduced when combined with pyrethroid-piperonyl butoxide (PBO) nets?
Anopheles gambiae
Antagonism
Chlorfenapyr
Experimental huts
Insecticide-treated nets
Malaria
Mosquitoes
Piperonyl butoxide
Pro-insecticide
Pyrethroid
Vector control
Journal
Malaria journal
ISSN: 1475-2875
Titre abrégé: Malar J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101139802
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Jul 2023
21 Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
30
03
2023
accepted:
14
07
2023
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
22
7
2023
entrez:
21
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pyrethroid-chlorfenapyr (CFP) and pyrethroid-piperonyl butoxide (PBO) nets are being scaled across endemic countries to improve control of malaria transmitted by pyrethroid-resistant mosquitoes. CFP is a pro-insecticide requiring activation by mosquito cytochrome P450 monooxygenase enzymes (P450s) while PBO improves pyrethroid potency by inhibiting the action of these enzymes in pyrethroid-resistant mosquitoes. The inhibitory action of PBO against P450s may thus reduce the efficacy of pyrethroid-CFP nets when applied inside the same household as pyrethroid-PBO nets. Two experimental hut trials were performed to evaluate the entomological impact of two different types of pyrethroid-CFP ITN (Interceptor The vector population was susceptible to CFP but exhibited a high intensity of pyrethroid resistance that was overcame by PBO pre-exposure. Vector mortality was significantly lower in huts with combinations of pyrethroid-CFP nets plus pyrethroid-PBO nets compared to huts with two pyrethroid-CFP nets (74% vs. 85% for Interceptor This study shows evidence of a reduced performance of pyrethroid-CFP nets when combined with pyrethroid-PBO ITNs compared to when applied alone and higher efficacy with net combinations that included pyrethroid-CFP nets. These findings suggest that in similar contexts, prioritizing distribution of pyrethroid-CFP nets over other net types would maximize vector control impact.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Pyrethroid-chlorfenapyr (CFP) and pyrethroid-piperonyl butoxide (PBO) nets are being scaled across endemic countries to improve control of malaria transmitted by pyrethroid-resistant mosquitoes. CFP is a pro-insecticide requiring activation by mosquito cytochrome P450 monooxygenase enzymes (P450s) while PBO improves pyrethroid potency by inhibiting the action of these enzymes in pyrethroid-resistant mosquitoes. The inhibitory action of PBO against P450s may thus reduce the efficacy of pyrethroid-CFP nets when applied inside the same household as pyrethroid-PBO nets.
METHODS
METHODS
Two experimental hut trials were performed to evaluate the entomological impact of two different types of pyrethroid-CFP ITN (Interceptor
RESULTS
RESULTS
The vector population was susceptible to CFP but exhibited a high intensity of pyrethroid resistance that was overcame by PBO pre-exposure. Vector mortality was significantly lower in huts with combinations of pyrethroid-CFP nets plus pyrethroid-PBO nets compared to huts with two pyrethroid-CFP nets (74% vs. 85% for Interceptor
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study shows evidence of a reduced performance of pyrethroid-CFP nets when combined with pyrethroid-PBO ITNs compared to when applied alone and higher efficacy with net combinations that included pyrethroid-CFP nets. These findings suggest that in similar contexts, prioritizing distribution of pyrethroid-CFP nets over other net types would maximize vector control impact.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37480030
doi: 10.1186/s12936-023-04648-6
pii: 10.1186/s12936-023-04648-6
pmc: PMC10362717
doi:
Substances chimiques
chlorfenapyr
NWI20P05EB
milbemycin oxime
0502PUN0GT
Piperonyl Butoxide
LWK91TU9AH
Pyrethrins
0
Insecticides
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
214Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 27;12(1):6857
pubmed: 35478216
Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Feb;23(2):247-258
pubmed: 36174592
Acta Trop. 2015 Mar;143:13-7
pubmed: 25497774
Curr Res Parasitol Vector Borne Dis. 2021 Aug 18;1:100047
pubmed: 35284856
Malar J. 2023 Feb 1;22(1):36
pubmed: 36726160
Trop Med Int Health. 2011 Apr;16(4):492-500
pubmed: 21324051
Nature. 2015 Oct 8;526(7572):207-211
pubmed: 26375008
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 22;10(1):12227
pubmed: 32699237
Lancet. 2022 Mar 26;399(10331):1227-1241
pubmed: 35339225
Malar J. 2011 Jan 25;10:16
pubmed: 21266037
Malar J. 2015 Mar 24;14:124
pubmed: 25879231
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 16;11(11):e0165925
pubmed: 27851828
Pest Manag Sci. 2021 Jan;77(1):64-76
pubmed: 32926594
Nat Commun. 2018 Nov 26;9(1):4982
pubmed: 30478327
Lancet. 2023 Feb 11;401(10375):435-446
pubmed: 36706778
Elife. 2016 Aug 22;5:
pubmed: 27547988
Malar J. 2015 Nov 18;14:464
pubmed: 26581678
J Med Entomol. 2006 Jan;43(1):55-60
pubmed: 16506447
Malar J. 2021 Apr 9;20(1):180
pubmed: 33836778
Nat Commun. 2022 Jul 5;13(1):3862
pubmed: 35790746
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Dec;104(12):758-65
pubmed: 20956008
Parasite. 2018;25:42
pubmed: 30088473
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 28;16(1):e0245804
pubmed: 33507978
Lancet. 2018 Apr 21;391(10130):1577-1588
pubmed: 29655496
Malar J. 2010 Apr 27;9:113
pubmed: 20423479
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Jun;18(6):640-649
pubmed: 29650424
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 9;13(1):2363
pubmed: 36759650
Acta Trop. 2011 Apr;118(1):50-5
pubmed: 21315680
Lancet Planet Health. 2022 Feb;6(2):e100-e109
pubmed: 35065707
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 23;14(12):e0226191
pubmed: 31869350
Malar J. 2022 Jan 11;21(1):20
pubmed: 35016676
Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2019 Nov;161:61-67
pubmed: 31685198