Younger Matched Unrelated Donors Confer Decreased Relapse Risk Compared to Older Sibling Donors in Older Patients with B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.
Humans
Aged
Middle Aged
Adult
Siblings
Unrelated Donors
Retrospective Studies
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
/ adverse effects
Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma
/ therapy
Precursor B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma
/ complications
Graft vs Host Disease
/ epidemiology
Recurrence
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Age
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation
Donor
Relapse
Journal
Transplantation and cellular therapy
ISSN: 2666-6367
Titre abrégé: Transplant Cell Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101774629
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
11
05
2023
revised:
08
07
2023
accepted:
16
07
2023
pmc-release:
01
10
2024
medline:
26
10
2023
pubmed:
23
7
2023
entrez:
22
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Although allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) offers cure for older patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), disease relapse remains a major issue. Whether matched sibling donors (MSDs) are still the preferred donor choice compared to younger matched unrelated donors (MUDs) in the contemporary era of improved transplantation practices remains unknown. This retrospective cohort registry study queried the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database in patients with B cell ALL (B-ALL) age ≥ 50 years undergoing alloHCT from older MSDs (age ≥ 50 years) or younger MUDs (age ≤ 35 years) between 2011 and 2018. The study included common allograft types, conditioning regimens, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis strategies. The primary outcome was relapse risk, and secondary outcomes included nonrelapse mortality (NRM), GVHD, leukemia-free survival (LFS), and overall survival (OS). Among 925 eligible patients in the study cohort, 386 underwent alloHCT with an older MSD (median donor age, 58 years) and 539 underwent alloHCT from a younger MUD (median donor age, 25 year). In multivariable analysis, younger MUDs conferred a significantly decreased risk of relapse (hazard ratio [HR], .68; P = .002) compared with older MSDs. The adjusted cumulative incidence of relapse at 5 years was significantly lower with younger MUDs than with older MSDs (26% versus 37%; P = .001). Younger MUDs were associated with a greater risk of chronic GVHD compared to older MSDs (HR, 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10 to 1.61; P = .003). Compared to older MSDs, younger MUDs conferred an increased NRM (HR, 1.38; P = .02) and higher adjusted cumulative incidence of NRM at 5 years (31% versus 22%; P = .006). There were no differences in post-alloHCT OS or LFS rates between younger MUDs and older MSDs (OS: HR, 1.09; [P = .37]; LFS: HR, .95 [P = .57]). The use of younger MUDs could be considered as a possible way to prevent relapse after alloHCT in older adults with ALL. Combining the use of younger MUDs with improved strategies to reduce GVHD merits further exploration to improve outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37481243
pii: S2666-6367(23)01422-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.07.015
pmc: PMC10592336
mid: NIHMS1919436
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
611-618Subventions
Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : 27305C0011
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : 27307C0011
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : 27398C0011
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U24 CA076518
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Blood. 2016 Jan 14;127(2):260-7
pubmed: 26527675
Blood. 2001 Mar 15;97(6):1572-7
pubmed: 11238093
Blood. 2010 Nov 18;116(20):4368-75
pubmed: 20664060
Haematologica. 2020 Oct 13;106(8):2086-2094
pubmed: 33054114
Cancer. 2006 Jun 15;106(12):2657-63
pubmed: 16703597
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017 Feb;23(2):182-183
pubmed: 27890697
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008 Jul;14(7):748-58
pubmed: 18541193
Blood. 2020 Dec 24;136(26):3070-3081
pubmed: 33367544
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2021 Dec 10;2021(1):254-263
pubmed: 34889392
Blood. 2007 Feb 1;109(3):944-50
pubmed: 17032921
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 Sep;26(9):1670-1678
pubmed: 32562858
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jun 10;28(17):2859-67
pubmed: 20439626
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 20;36(24):2524-2531
pubmed: 29902106
Transplant Cell Ther. 2021 Jul;27(7):545-557
pubmed: 33839317
JAMA Oncol. 2022 Mar 01;8(3):404-411
pubmed: 35024768
J Immunother Cancer. 2019 Apr 2;7(1):92
pubmed: 30940203
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jul 15;22(14):2816-25
pubmed: 15254049
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Feb 10;39(5):386-396
pubmed: 33434062
Blood. 2013 Mar 28;121(13):2567-73
pubmed: 23361908
Cancer. 2017 Sep 1;123(17):3346-3355
pubmed: 28452054
Blood Adv. 2023 Apr 25;7(8):1594-1603
pubmed: 36630564
Blood. 2014 Aug 14;124(7):1174-82
pubmed: 24939656
Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Jul;28(7):409.e1-409.e10
pubmed: 35447374
Lancet Haematol. 2022 Apr;9(4):e276-e288
pubmed: 35358442
J Clin Oncol. 1994 Aug;12(8):1710-7
pubmed: 8040682
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018 May;24(5):1049-1056
pubmed: 29454040
Blood. 2005 Dec 1;106(12):3760-7
pubmed: 16105981
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Sep 20;27(27):4570-7
pubmed: 19652066
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Nov;25(11):2113-2123
pubmed: 31446198
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Apr;25(4):e128-e140
pubmed: 30658222
PLoS Biol. 2007 Aug;5(8):e201
pubmed: 17676974
Blood Adv. 2022 Jan 11;6(1):339-357
pubmed: 34547770
Haematologica. 2010 Apr;95(4):589-96
pubmed: 20145276
Blood. 2008 Jul 15;112(2):426-34
pubmed: 18398065
Leukemia. 2015 Mar;29(3):526-34
pubmed: 25079173
N Engl J Med. 2014 Dec 25;371(26):2488-98
pubmed: 25426837
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2019 Mar;17(3):166-175
pubmed: 30969955
Blood. 1990 Feb 1;75(3):555-62
pubmed: 2297567