pH-responsive scaffolds for tissue regeneration: In vivo performance.
Bacteria-triggered release
Bone regeneration
Reversible bonds
Wound healing
pH-sensitive
Journal
Acta biomaterialia
ISSN: 1878-7568
Titre abrégé: Acta Biomater
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101233144
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 09 2023
15 09 2023
Historique:
received:
03
05
2023
revised:
25
06
2023
accepted:
18
07
2023
medline:
22
8
2023
pubmed:
24
7
2023
entrez:
23
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A myriad of pH-sensitive scaffolds has been reported in recent decades. Information on their behaviour in vitro under conditions that mimic the pH changes that occur during tissue regeneration is abundant. Differently, the in vivo demonstration of the advantages of pH-responsive systems in comparison with non-responders is more limited. The in vivo scenario is very complex and the intricate relationship between the host response, the overall pathological conditions of the patient, and the risk of colonization by microorganisms is very difficult to imitate in in vitro tests. This review aims to shed light on how the changes in pH between healthy and damaged states and also during the healing process have been exploited so far to develop polymer-based scaffolds that actively contribute in vivo to the healing process avoiding chronification. The main strategies so far tested to prepare pH-responsive scaffolds rely on (i) changes in ionization of natural polymers, ionizable monomers and clays, (ii) reversible cross-linkers, (iii) coatings, and (iv) production of CO
Identifiants
pubmed: 37482146
pii: S1742-7061(23)00411-7
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.07.025
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Polymers
0
Cross-Linking Reagents
0
Clay
T1FAD4SS2M
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
22-41Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.