Molecular profiling of solid tumors by next-generation sequencing: an experience from a clinical laboratory.
NGS
colon cancer
lung cancer
melanoma
solid tumor
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
18
04
2023
accepted:
05
06
2023
medline:
24
7
2023
pubmed:
24
7
2023
entrez:
24
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Personalized targeted therapies have transformed management of several solid tumors. Timely and accurate detection of clinically relevant genetic variants in tumor is central to the implementation of molecular targeted therapies. To facilitate precise molecular testing in solid tumors, targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays have emerged as a valuable tool. In this study, we provide an overview of the technical validation, diagnostic yields, and spectrum of variants observed in 3,164 solid tumor samples that were tested as part of the standard clinical diagnostic assessment in an academic healthcare institution over a period of 2 years. The Ion Ampliseq™ Cancer Hotspot Panel v2 assay (ThermoFisher) that targets ~2,800 COSMIC mutations from 50 oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes was validated, and a total of 3,164 tumor DNA samples were tested in 2 years. A total of 500 tumor samples were tested by the comprehensive panel containing all the 50 genes. Other samples, including 1,375 lung cancer, 692 colon cancer, 462 melanoma, and 135 brain cancer, were tested by tumor-specific targeted subpanels including a few clinically actionable genes. Of 3,164 patient samples, 2,016 (63.7%) tested positive for at least one clinically relevant variant. Of 500 samples tested by a comprehensive panel, 290 had a clinically relevant variant with TP53, KRAS, and PIK3CA being the most frequently mutated genes. The diagnostic yields in major tumor types were as follows: breast (58.4%), colorectal (77.6%), lung (60.4%), pancreatic (84.6%), endometrial (72.4%), ovary (57.1%), and thyroid (73.9%). Tumor-specific targeted subpanels also demonstrated high diagnostic yields: lung (69%), colon (61.2%), melanoma (69.7%), and brain (20.7%). Co-occurrence of mutations in more than one gene was frequently observed. The findings of our study demonstrate the feasibility of integrating an NGS-based gene panel screen as part of a standard diagnostic protocol for solid tumor assessment. High diagnostic rates enable significant clinical impact including improved diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical management in patients with solid tumors.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Personalized targeted therapies have transformed management of several solid tumors. Timely and accurate detection of clinically relevant genetic variants in tumor is central to the implementation of molecular targeted therapies. To facilitate precise molecular testing in solid tumors, targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays have emerged as a valuable tool. In this study, we provide an overview of the technical validation, diagnostic yields, and spectrum of variants observed in 3,164 solid tumor samples that were tested as part of the standard clinical diagnostic assessment in an academic healthcare institution over a period of 2 years.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
The Ion Ampliseq™ Cancer Hotspot Panel v2 assay (ThermoFisher) that targets ~2,800 COSMIC mutations from 50 oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes was validated, and a total of 3,164 tumor DNA samples were tested in 2 years. A total of 500 tumor samples were tested by the comprehensive panel containing all the 50 genes. Other samples, including 1,375 lung cancer, 692 colon cancer, 462 melanoma, and 135 brain cancer, were tested by tumor-specific targeted subpanels including a few clinically actionable genes.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Of 3,164 patient samples, 2,016 (63.7%) tested positive for at least one clinically relevant variant. Of 500 samples tested by a comprehensive panel, 290 had a clinically relevant variant with TP53, KRAS, and PIK3CA being the most frequently mutated genes. The diagnostic yields in major tumor types were as follows: breast (58.4%), colorectal (77.6%), lung (60.4%), pancreatic (84.6%), endometrial (72.4%), ovary (57.1%), and thyroid (73.9%). Tumor-specific targeted subpanels also demonstrated high diagnostic yields: lung (69%), colon (61.2%), melanoma (69.7%), and brain (20.7%). Co-occurrence of mutations in more than one gene was frequently observed.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
The findings of our study demonstrate the feasibility of integrating an NGS-based gene panel screen as part of a standard diagnostic protocol for solid tumor assessment. High diagnostic rates enable significant clinical impact including improved diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical management in patients with solid tumors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37483495
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1208244
pmc: PMC10359709
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1208244Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Bhai, Turowec, Santos, Kerkhof, Pickard, Foroutan, Breadner, Cecchini, Levy, Stuart, Welch, Howlett, Lin and Sadikovic.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Cell J. 2017 Spring;19(Suppl 1):113-117
pubmed: 28580315
Nat Commun. 2016 May 10;7:11479
pubmed: 27161491
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Oct 1;23(19):5981-5992
pubmed: 28645941
Cells. 2022 Oct 12;11(20):
pubmed: 36291069
JCO Precis Oncol. 2022 Aug;6:e2100504
pubmed: 35977347
Front Oncol. 2021 Jun 16;11:665484
pubmed: 34221980
J Mol Diagn. 2017 Jan;19(1):4-23
pubmed: 27993330
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec 10;38(35):4208-4218
pubmed: 33104438
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jan 09;22(2):
pubmed: 33435440
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2020 Jan 02;31:100532
pubmed: 31934607
Aging (Albany NY). 2021 Apr 23;13(8):11860-11876
pubmed: 33893247
Cancer. 2013 Oct 15;119(20):3696-702
pubmed: 23913621
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 28;12:946625
pubmed: 36248982
iScience. 2019 Oct 25;20:324-336
pubmed: 31605946
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 16;380(20):1929-1940
pubmed: 31091374
Cell Death Dis. 2018 Jul 3;9(7):739
pubmed: 29970892
Histopathology. 2022 Apr;80(5):762-778
pubmed: 34996131
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Mar 02;19(3):254-266
pubmed: 33668021
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 02;12:949098
pubmed: 36119511
Mol Diagn Ther. 2022 Jan;26(1):7-18
pubmed: 34813053
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2015 May 15;7:111-23
pubmed: 26028978
Br J Cancer. 2013 Sep 17;109(6):1703-10
pubmed: 23949151
Semin Oncol. 2021 Feb;48(1):10-18
pubmed: 33676749
Yonsei Med J. 2020 Jul;61(7):562-571
pubmed: 32608199
J Thorac Oncol. 2021 May;16(5):764-773
pubmed: 33333327
Science. 2008 Sep 26;321(5897):1807-12
pubmed: 18772396
BMC Cancer. 2020 Apr 16;20(1):328
pubmed: 32299384
JCO Precis Oncol. 2020 Nov;4:411-425
pubmed: 35050738
Cancer Treat Rev. 2021 Sep;99:102238
pubmed: 34098219
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Aug;306(2):423-431
pubmed: 35034160
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Mar;17(3):153-168
pubmed: 32005945
Front Oncol. 2023 Feb 01;13:1124167
pubmed: 37077826
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Mar 02;19(3):329-359
pubmed: 33724754
Cancer Biol Med. 2016 Mar;13(1):3-11
pubmed: 27144058
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jan 20;386(3):241-251
pubmed: 34534430
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2020 Jun 15;8(3):192-205
pubmed: 32665851
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020 Mar 20;5(1):22
pubmed: 32296018
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Jan 1;25(1):64-72
pubmed: 30206164
Case Rep Oncol. 2014 May 08;7(2):297-300
pubmed: 24926260
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019 Jun;10(3):577-581
pubmed: 31183211
Neuro Oncol. 2014 Jan;16(2):318-9
pubmed: 24311634
Front Oncol. 2019 Sep 04;9:851
pubmed: 31552176
Clin Cancer Res. 1998 Dec;4(12):3005-10
pubmed: 9865913
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;36(1):7-13
pubmed: 29072975
J Clin Oncol. 2018 May 1;36(13):1291-1299
pubmed: 29401002
Cancer Genet. 2016 May;209(5):195-8
pubmed: 27068338
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2019 Jan;38 Suppl 1:S123-S131
pubmed: 29517499
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb;146(2):407-416
pubmed: 31696302
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Aug 2;23(8):1231-1251
pubmed: 34185076
Mod Pathol. 2017 Jul;30(7):1032-1041
pubmed: 28281553
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 16;17(6):e0267090
pubmed: 35709138
J Thorac Oncol. 2019 Apr;14(4):606-616
pubmed: 30605727
Cancers (Basel). 2023 May 04;15(9):
pubmed: 37174072
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Nov 22;13(22):
pubmed: 34831002
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 13;13(9):e0203495
pubmed: 30212483
Front Mol Biosci. 2020 Jul 24;7:172
pubmed: 32850962
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jul;69(4):305-343
pubmed: 31116423
Mol Clin Oncol. 2016 Dec;5(6):705-713
pubmed: 28101350
Curr Opin Oncol. 2022 Mar 1;34(2):115-122
pubmed: 35050937