Work Intensity of Postoperative Care Following Implantation of Presbyopia-Correcting versus Monofocal Intraocular Lenses.

AECOS cataract surgery multifocal IOLs presbyopia-correcting IOLs work intensity of postoperative care

Journal

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
ISSN: 1177-5467
Titre abrégé: Clin Ophthalmol
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101321512

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 21 04 2023
accepted: 27 06 2023
medline: 24 7 2023
pubmed: 24 7 2023
entrez: 24 7 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To compare the work intensity of postoperative care following implantation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs) to that of standard monofocal IOLs. This open-label, multicenter, comparative study retrospectively reviewed the case records of cataract surgery patients who underwent bilateral implantation of either presbyopia-correcting IOLs (presby-IOL group; N=177) or standard monofocal IOLs (monofocal group; N=177). Outcome measures included the total time the patient spent in the office, number of visits, mean duration of visits, and the number of procedures and diagnostic tests during the first postoperative year. Outcome measures were compared between the first 90 days and days 91-365 after surgery. Mean (±SD) time spent in the office during the first postoperative year was 5:50 ± 3:35 hours (H:MM) over 6.6 ± 2.9 visits in the presby-IOL group, compared to 3:38 ± 1:36 hours over 4.9 ± 1.6 visits in the monofocal IOL group (p <0.001). During the first 90 days, a presby-IOL patient spent 40 minutes longer in the office than a monofocal IOL patient (3:39 ± 1:38 hours vs 2.59 ± 1:13 hours) (p <0.001). During days 91-365, time in the office was 1:32 hours longer (p <0.001), and the mean visit duration was 8 minutes longer for the presby-IOL patients (p=0.002) than those with monofocal IOL. In addition, the presby-IOL patients underwent more procedures and diagnostic tests (p ≤0.001) as compared with standard monofocal cataract surgery patients. Patients implanted with presbyopia-correcting IOLs require significantly more clinic time, diagnostic testing, and procedures postoperatively as compared with standard monofocal cataract surgery patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37483840
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S418128
pii: 418128
pmc: PMC10361271
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1993-2001

Informations de copyright

© 2023 Maloney et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

RKM is a consultant to Johnson and Johnson Vision, LENSAR, and Presbia, and an equity/stock holder of RxSight, Stroma Medical and Percept; He is also a consultant for and paid in stock options by Horizon Surgical. JD is a consultant to Zeiss and RxSight. RW is a consultant to Alcon, Bausch and Lomb, Johnson and Johnson Vision, LENSAR, and Zeiss; He also reports personal fees from Eye Point Pharma, Beyeonics, Visus (with ownership interest), BVI, Trefoil, and RxSight (with ownership interest). KED is a consultant to Alcon, Johnson and Johnson, Bausch and Lomb and Zeiss.

Références

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 Oct 1;47(10):1256-1257
pubmed: 34544084
Eye Vis (Lond). 2014 Oct 16;1:2
pubmed: 26605349
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 May 1;48(5):632-633
pubmed: 35703838
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Jun;35(6):992-7
pubmed: 19465282
Clin Ophthalmol. 2016 Oct 11;10:1965-1970
pubmed: 27784985

Auteurs

Robert K Maloney (RK)

Maloney-Shamie Vision Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

John Doane (J)

Discover Vision Centers, Kansas City, MO, USA.

Robert Weinstock (R)

The Eye Institute of West Florida, Saint Petersburg, FL, USA.

Kendall E Donaldson (KE)

Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Plantation, FL, USA.

Classifications MeSH