Fungicide Use Patterns in Select United States Wine Grape Production Regions.

Disease management FRAC 11 fungicide resistance Subject Areas Vitis spp. fungicide records wine grapes

Journal

Plant disease
ISSN: 0191-2917
Titre abrégé: Plant Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9882809

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 Jul 2023
Historique:
medline: 24 7 2023
pubmed: 24 7 2023
entrez: 24 7 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Wine grape production (Vitis sp.) in the United States requires fungicide inputs for disease control. Currently, there is limited data available on vineyard fungicide use patterns. This information is important in developing tailored recommendations for disease management and fungicide stewardship. In this paper, we summarize the wine grape vineyard fungicide use patterns from four major regions, Napa and Sonoma Valleys (California), Willamette Valley (Oregon), Columbia Valley (Washington), and several smaller regions east of the Mississippi River in years 2009-2020. We learned that the average in-season total fungicide applications ranged regionally from 5.6 to 8. The most commonly applied FRAC codes in spray programs were FRAC 3, 13, and M02 across all regions, with some variation to the top four groups in each region. Most applications were made on 14-day intervals; however, shorter intervals (7-day) were favored early season, and longer intervals (21-day) were favored late season. Tank-mixing multiple active ingredients was common east of the Mississippi River during all stages of grape development; this action was typically favored during the bloom period in other regions. In a subset of records that participated in FRAC 11 fungicide resistance testing, the average number of FRAC 11 applications after testing was reduced to either no applications or one application in Napa and Sonoma Valleys. This survey provides regionally specific data related to fungicide stewardship practices that could be a focus for future stewardship messaging and fungicide resistance selection training: total product use (selection events), spray intervals (selection pressure), and tank mixing (selection management).

Identifiants

pubmed: 37486275
doi: 10.1094/PDIS-04-23-0798-RE
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Charlotte Oliver (C)

Colorado State University Extension, Grand Junction, Colorado, United States; cloliver@rams.colostate.edu.

Monica Cooper (M)

University of California, Cooperative Extension, 1710 Soscol Ave, Napa, California, United States, 94559; mlycooper@ucdavis.edu.

Melanie L Lewis Ivey (ML)

The Ohio State University, Plant Pathology, 1680 Madison Avenue, Wooster, Ohio, United States, 44691; ivey.14@osu.edu.

Phillip Brannen (P)

2105 Miller Plant SciencesAthens, United States, 30602; pbrannen@uga.edu.

Timothy D Miles (TD)

Michigan State University, Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, 105 CIPS, East Lansing, Michigan, United States, 48824; milesti2@msu.edu.

Sarah R Lowder (SR)

Oregon State University College of Agricultural Sciences, 97116, Botany and Plant Pathology, 3420 NW Orchard Ave, Corvallis, Oregon, United States, 97331.
University of Georgia, Horticulture, 1111 Plant Sciences Bldg, Athens, Georgia, United States, 30602; sarah.lowder@uga.edu.

Walter F Mahaffee (WF)

USDA - ARS, Horticulture Crops Research Unit, 3420 NW Orchard Avenue, Corvallis, Oregon, United States, 97330; Walt.Mahaffee@usda.gov.

Michelle Moyer (M)

Washington State University-IAREC, Viticulture and Enology, Prosser, Washington, United States; michelle.moyer@wsu.edu.

Classifications MeSH