Stakeholders' priorities in the development of evidence-based practice competencies in rehabilitation students: a nominal group technique study.

Evidence-based practice consensus methods education nominal group technique occupational therapy physical therapy rehabilitation speech-language pathology

Journal

Disability and rehabilitation
ISSN: 1464-5165
Titre abrégé: Disabil Rehabil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9207179

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Jul 2023
Historique:
medline: 25 7 2023
pubmed: 25 7 2023
entrez: 25 7 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Clinically integrated teaching (CIT) is an effective approach for promoting evidence-based practice (EBP) competencies among medical students. Challenges towards the implementation of CIT in rehabilitation curricula include educators' different conceptualizations of EBP, the perceived complexity of EBP and the boundaries between the academic and the clinical setting. This study aimed to identify tailored strategies to implement in rehabilitation programs and their affiliated clinical sites to support the development of EBP competencies among students in occupational therapy (OT), physical therapy (PT) and speech-language pathology (S-LP). Nominal group technique (NGT) with stakeholders from three rehabilitation programs in Canada, offering the professional master's in OT and PT ( The top two strategies identified in the OT/PT NGT were: 1) Developing a flexible definition of EBP that recognizes its complexity; 2) Providing clinicians with more access to the teaching content by pairing faculty with preceptors. The top two strategies identified in the S-LP NGT were: 1) Providing students with opportunities for decision-making with experienced clinicians; 2) Increasing interactions between faculty and preceptors using formal group meetings. Findings laid foundations for future integrated knowledge translation projects to collaboratively implement, and test identified strategies. Rehabilitation professions including occupational therapy, physical therapy and speech-language pathology acknowledge the importance of evidence-based practice (EBP).Current challenges in the teaching of EBP among rehabilitation students include educators’ different conceptualizations of EBP, the perceived complexity of EBP, and the boundaries between the academic and the clinical setting.This study shows that increasing interactions between faculty and preceptors, for instance through an online community of practice, constitutes a stakeholder-endorsed priority to advance EBP education in rehabilitation.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
Rehabilitation professions including occupational therapy, physical therapy and speech-language pathology acknowledge the importance of evidence-based practice (EBP).Current challenges in the teaching of EBP among rehabilitation students include educators’ different conceptualizations of EBP, the perceived complexity of EBP, and the boundaries between the academic and the clinical setting.This study shows that increasing interactions between faculty and preceptors, for instance through an online community of practice, constitutes a stakeholder-endorsed priority to advance EBP education in rehabilitation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37489946
doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2239138
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-10

Auteurs

Marie-Christine Hallé (MC)

School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Canada.
Département d'orthophonie, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada.

André Bussières (A)

School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Canada.
Département chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada.

Liliane Asseraf-Pasin (L)

School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Institute of Health Sciences Education, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Caroline Storr (C)

School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Susanne Mak (S)

School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Canada.
Institute of Health Sciences Education, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Kelly Root (K)

School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Heather Owens (H)

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Fatima Amari (F)

School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Aliki Thomas (A)

School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Canada.
Institute of Health Sciences Education, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Classifications MeSH