Costs and models used in the economic analysis of Total Knee Replacement (TKR): A systematic review.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
27
12
2022
accepted:
12
07
2023
medline:
27
7
2023
pubmed:
25
7
2023
entrez:
25
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The main objective of this review is to summarize the evidence on the core modelling specifications and methodology on the cost-effectiveness of TKR compared to non-surgical management. Another objective of this study is to synthesize evidence of TKR cost and compare it across countries using purchasing power parity (PPP). The electronic databases used for this review were MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), HTAIn repository, Cost effectiveness Analysis (CEA) registry, and Google Scholar. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) was used to assess the validity of the methods and transparency in reporting the results. The Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) was used to check the quality of economic evaluation models of the studies included. The cost of TKR surgery from high income and low- or middle-income countries were extracted and converted to single USD ($) using purchasing power parities (PPP) method. Thirty-two studies were included in this review, out of which eight studies used Markov model, five used regression model, one each reported Marginal structure model, discrete simulation model, decision tree and Osteoarthritis Policy Model (OAPol) respectively to assess the cost-effectiveness of TKR. For PPP, twenty-six studies were included in the analysis of TKR cost. The average cost of TKR surgery was the lowest in developing country-India ($3457) and highest in USA ($19568). The findings of this review showed that the Markov model was most widely used in the analysis of the cost effectiveness of TKR. Our review also concluded that the cost of TKR was higher in the developed countries as compared to the developing countries.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37490490
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280371
pii: PONE-D-22-35337
pmc: PMC10368258
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0280371Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Gandhi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Can J Surg. 2012 Jun;55(3):181-90
pubmed: 22630061
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jun;36(6):1864-1872.e10
pubmed: 33589278
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2020 Nov 16;32(1):60
pubmed: 33198817
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Apr;66(4):592-9
pubmed: 24124052
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Jan 15;96(2):119-26
pubmed: 24430411
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2015 Jul-Aug;110(4):368-74
pubmed: 26305202
Eur J Med Res. 2009;14:76-84
pubmed: 19258217
N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 18;374(7):692
pubmed: 26886535
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e25403
pubmed: 21966520
J Arthroplasty. 2013 Mar;28(3):449-54
pubmed: 23142446
Int Orthop. 2008 Jun;32(3):339-43
pubmed: 17333185
BMJ. 2017 Mar 28;356:j1131
pubmed: 28351833
Indian J Orthop. 2016 Sep;50(5):518-522
pubmed: 27746495
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Feb;32(2):395-401.e2
pubmed: 27612604
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 15;10(1):e033495
pubmed: 31948990
Med Care. 2003 Jan;41(1):32-44
pubmed: 12544542
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Nov 26;29-30:100587
pubmed: 34505846
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Nov;35(11):3364-3374
pubmed: 32680755
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Dec;31(12):2730-2735.e7
pubmed: 27394074
Gac Sanit. 2008 Jul-Aug;22(4):337-43
pubmed: 18755084
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Jun;174(6):747-757
pubmed: 33750190
J Orthop. 2020 Oct 08;22:485-492
pubmed: 33093759
Med Care. 2017 Dec;55(12):993-1000
pubmed: 29036012
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Oct 3;100(19):1653-1660
pubmed: 30277995
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 Dec;(345):134-9
pubmed: 9418630
Control Clin Trials. 1989 Dec;10(4):407-15
pubmed: 2691207
Health Econ Rev. 2019 May 27;9(1):15
pubmed: 31134439
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 May 10;18(1):183
pubmed: 28486957
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Feb;32(2):351-354
pubmed: 27665243
J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Sep;12(9):551-8
pubmed: 9294789
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Jun 22;169(12):1113-21; discussion 1121-2
pubmed: 19546411
Clin Geriatr Med. 2010 Aug;26(3):355-69
pubmed: 20699159
Value Health Reg Issues. 2021 May;24:173-180
pubmed: 33831792
Clin Geriatr Med. 2012 Aug;28(3):395-429
pubmed: 22840305
Int Orthop. 2020 Jan;44(1):77-83
pubmed: 31520177
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7S):S32-S38
pubmed: 29550168
Int J Audiol. 2021 Mar;60(3):162-170
pubmed: 33590787
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5
pubmed: 17403800
BMJ Open. 2012 Jan 30;2(1):e000332
pubmed: 22290396
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2022 Sep 1;20(1):47
pubmed: 36050692
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016 Dec;24(12):2069-2076
pubmed: 27492465
J Arthroplasty. 1993 Aug;8(4):395-400
pubmed: 8409991
BMJ. 2013 Mar 25;346:f1049
pubmed: 23529982
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2012 Oct;26(5):649-58
pubmed: 23218429
Acta Orthop. 2007 Feb;78(1):108-15
pubmed: 17453401
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997 Fall;13(4):575-88
pubmed: 9489250
Geriatrics (Basel). 2021 Jun 30;6(3):
pubmed: 34209013
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Aug 21;95(16):1473-80
pubmed: 23965697