Robotic Microsurgery in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Literature Review.

microsurgery reconstructive surgery review robotic-assisted platforms robotics

Journal

Surgical innovation
ISSN: 1553-3514
Titre abrégé: Surg Innov
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101233809

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Historique:
medline: 25 9 2023
pubmed: 26 7 2023
entrez: 25 7 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Surgical robots have innovated the microsurgical field by providing advantages that improve surgical performance. These robots have been adopted by certain specialties more than others. This study discusses the potential advantages of robotics in plastic and reconstructive surgery. This study is a literature review of articles investigating "robotic microsurgery in plastic and reconstructive surgery" using the PubMed database and the Cochrane Library. A total of nineteen relevant articles were found and 5 articles performed a direct comparison between the robotic and manual approaches. Longer operating times were reported in the robotic groups featuring higher learning curves. Reported advantages to robotic use included higher accuracy, precision and flexibility, elimination of tremor and improvement of ergonomic factors. While the results provide an outlook into the outcome of robotic platforms in this field, current research is limited and further studies are required to provide a fundamental analysis.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Surgical robots have innovated the microsurgical field by providing advantages that improve surgical performance. These robots have been adopted by certain specialties more than others. This study discusses the potential advantages of robotics in plastic and reconstructive surgery.
METHOD METHODS
This study is a literature review of articles investigating "robotic microsurgery in plastic and reconstructive surgery" using the PubMed database and the Cochrane Library.
RESULT RESULTS
A total of nineteen relevant articles were found and 5 articles performed a direct comparison between the robotic and manual approaches. Longer operating times were reported in the robotic groups featuring higher learning curves. Reported advantages to robotic use included higher accuracy, precision and flexibility, elimination of tremor and improvement of ergonomic factors.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
While the results provide an outlook into the outcome of robotic platforms in this field, current research is limited and further studies are required to provide a fundamental analysis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37490999
doi: 10.1177/15533506231191211
pmc: PMC10515453
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

607-614

Références

Semin Plast Surg. 2014 Feb;28(1):20-5
pubmed: 24872775
J Robot Surg. 2012 Mar;6(1):77-80
pubmed: 27637983
J Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct;118(5):826-831
pubmed: 30114335
Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2015 Aug;60(4):305-12
pubmed: 25896870
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2020 Jun;36(5):362-368
pubmed: 32106313
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Feb;12(2):97-104
pubmed: 32190359
Microsurgery. 2019 Nov;39(8):715-720
pubmed: 30977562
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jun;129(6):1305-1312
pubmed: 22634647
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2012 Sep;28(7):481-4
pubmed: 22638874
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(1):101-2
pubmed: 17126276
Oral Oncol. 2017 Sep;72:194-196
pubmed: 28720420
Clin Breast Cancer. 2020 Feb;20(1):e1-e8
pubmed: 31780382
Microsurgery. 2009;29(3):232-5
pubmed: 19205058
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2006 Jan;22(1):53-7
pubmed: 16425123
Front Surg. 2018 Mar 22;5:22
pubmed: 29740585
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2000 Nov;16(8):643-9
pubmed: 11127288
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2006 Aug;22(6):429-31
pubmed: 16894487
Nat Commun. 2020 Feb 11;11(1):757
pubmed: 32047155
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Nov;142(5):1367-1376
pubmed: 30119108
Robot Surg. 2018;5:1-11
pubmed: 29527537
J Robot Surg. 2019 Aug;13(4):539-543
pubmed: 30911884
Microsurgery. 2018 Sep;38(6):702-705
pubmed: 29368352
Chin J Traumatol. 2019 Apr;22(2):88-92
pubmed: 30962128
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jan/Feb;24(1):1-12
pubmed: 28914699
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Dec;126(6):1978-1987
pubmed: 21124136
Microsurgery. 2001;21(1):22-9
pubmed: 11426637
Int J Impot Res. 2022 Jan;34(1):113-115
pubmed: 33024287
Microsurgery. 2005;25(7):566-9
pubmed: 16178007

Auteurs

Hussain S H Ghandourah (HSH)

Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Rutger M Schols (RM)

Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Joost A G N Wolfs (JAGN)

Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Fahed Altaweel (F)

Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Tom J M van Mulken (TJM)

Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Articles similaires

Humans Students, Medical Robotic Surgical Procedures Feasibility Studies Female
Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal
Humans Robotic Surgical Procedures Male Female Aged
Humans Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee Osteoarthritis, Knee Awards and Prizes Biomechanical Phenomena

Classifications MeSH