Soft-robotic green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas) developed to replace animal experimentation provides new insight into their propulsive strategies.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 07 2023
25 07 2023
Historique:
received:
14
12
2022
accepted:
29
06
2023
medline:
27
7
2023
pubmed:
26
7
2023
entrez:
25
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas) can swim up to 50 km per day while only consuming seagrass or microalgae. How the animal accomplishes this vast journey on such low energy intake points to the effectiveness of their swimming technique and is a testament to the power of evolution. Understanding the green sea turtle's ability to accomplish these journeys requires insight into their propulsive strategies. Conducting animal testing to uncover their propulsive strategies brings significant challenges: firstly, the ethical issues of conducting experiments on an endangered animal, and secondly, the animal may not even swim with its regular routine during the experiments. In this work, we develop a new soft-robotic sea turtle that reproduces the real animal's form and function to provide biomechanical insights without the need for invasive experimentation. We found that the green sea turtle may only produce propulsion for approximately 30% of the limb beat cycle, with the remaining 70% exploiting a power-preserving low-drag glide. Due to the animal's large mass and relatively low drag coefficient, losses in swim speed are minimal during the gliding stage. These findings may lead to the creation of a new generation of robotic systems for ocean exploration that use an optimised derivative of the sea turtle propulsive strategy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37491547
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37904-5
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-37904-5
pmc: PMC10368674
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
11983Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 31;12(1):18151
pubmed: 36316441
Bioinspir Biomim. 2013 Jun;8(2):026007
pubmed: 23612858
Bioinspir Biomim. 2016 May 04;11(3):036010
pubmed: 27145061
J Exp Biol. 2010 Jan 1;213(1):63-71
pubmed: 20008363
Nature. 2003 Oct 16;425(6959):707-11
pubmed: 14562101
Bioinspir Biomim. 2021 Jun 18;16(4):
pubmed: 33984843
J Exp Biol. 2021 Feb 16;224(Pt 4):
pubmed: 33436369
Adv Mater. 2017 Nov;29(43):
pubmed: 28949425
Biol Open. 2014 Sep 04;3(10):887-94
pubmed: 25190060
J Exp Biol. 2009 Dec;212(Pt 24):4019-26
pubmed: 19946080
Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Dec 7;265(1412):2279-84
pubmed: 9881473
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 12;8(6):e66043
pubmed: 23776603
Bioinspir Biomim. 2021 Sep 09;16(6):
pubmed: 34020436
Bioinspir Biomim. 2020 Mar 03;15(3):035002
pubmed: 31923905
Nature. 2022 Oct;610(7931):283-289
pubmed: 36224418
J Anim Ecol. 2011 Jan;80(1):57-68
pubmed: 20946384