Myocardial Blood Flow Determination From Contrast-Free Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quantification of Coronary Sinus Flow.


Journal

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI
ISSN: 1522-2586
Titre abrégé: J Magn Reson Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9105850

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2024
Historique:
revised: 09 07 2023
received: 28 11 2022
accepted: 10 07 2023
medline: 12 3 2024
pubmed: 26 7 2023
entrez: 26 7 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Determination of myocardial blood flow (MBF) with MRI is usually performed with dynamic contrast enhanced imaging (MBF To compare MBF Prospective, sequence-comparison study. 147 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (age: 56+/-12 years; 106 male; diabetes duration: 12.9+/-8.1 years), and 25 age-matched controls. 1.5 Tesla scanner. Saturation recovery sequence for MBF MBF Agreement between MBF Rest and stress flows, including both MBF MBF may be determined from coronary sinus blood flow, with acceptable bias, but relatively large limits of agreement, against the reference of MBF 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Determination of myocardial blood flow (MBF) with MRI is usually performed with dynamic contrast enhanced imaging (MBF
PURPOSE OBJECTIVE
To compare MBF
STUDY TYPE METHODS
Prospective, sequence-comparison study.
POPULATION METHODS
147 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (age: 56+/-12 years; 106 male; diabetes duration: 12.9+/-8.1 years), and 25 age-matched controls.
FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCES UNASSIGNED
1.5 Tesla scanner. Saturation recovery sequence for MBF
ASSESSMENT RESULTS
MBF
STATISTICAL TESTS METHODS
Agreement between MBF
RESULTS RESULTS
Rest and stress flows, including both MBF
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
MBF may be determined from coronary sinus blood flow, with acceptable bias, but relatively large limits of agreement, against the reference of MBF
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE METHODS
1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37491887
doi: 10.1002/jmri.28919
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1258-1266

Informations de copyright

© 2023 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Références

Murthy VL, Bateman TM, Beanlands RS, et al. Clinical quantification of myocardial blood flow using PET: Joint position paper of the SNMMI cardiovascular council and the ASNC. J Nucl Cardiol 2018;59(2):273-293.
Pelletier-Galarneau M, Martineau P, El Fakhri G. Quantification of PET myocardial blood flow. Curr Cardiol Rep 2019;21(3):11.
Jerosch-Herold M. Quantification of myocardial perfusion by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2010;12(1):57.
Case JA, DeKemp RA, Slomka PJ, Smith MF, Heller GV, Cerqueira MD. Status of cardiovascular PET radiation exposure and strategies for reduction: An information statement from the cardiovascular PET task force. J Nucl Cardiol 2017;24(4):1427-1439.
Sabarudin A, Siong TW, Chin AW, Hoong NK, Karim MKA. A comparison study of radiation effective dose in ECG-gated coronary CT angiography and calcium scoring examinations performed with a dual-source CT scanner. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):4374.
Thomsen HS, Morcos SK, Almén T, et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and gadolinium-based contrast media: Updated ESUR contrast medium safety committee guidelines. Eur Radiol 2013;23(2):307-318.
Sirajuddin A, Chen MY, White CS, Arai AE. Coronary venous anatomy and anomalies. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2020;14(1):80-86.
Loukas M, Bilinsky S, Bilinsky E, el-Sedfy A, Anderson RH. Cardiac veins: A review of the literature. Clin Anat 2009;22(1):129-145.
Kassem MW, Lake S, Roberts W, Salandy S, Loukas M. Cardiac veins, an anatomical review. Transl Res Anat 2021;23:100096.
Anderson RH, Spicer DE, Hlavacek AM, Cook AC, Backer CL. Wilcox's surgical anatomy of the heart: Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2013.
Ganz W, Tamura K, Marcus HS, Donoso R, Yoshida S, Swan HJ. Measurement of coronary sinus blood flow by continuous thermodilution in man. Circulation 1971;44(2):181-195.
Bloch KM, Carlsson M, Arheden H, Ståhlberg F. Quantifying coronary sinus flow and global LV perfusion at 3T. BMC Med Imaging 2009;11(9):9.
Dandekar VK, Bauml MA, Ertel AW, Dickens C, Gonzalez RC, Farzaneh-Far A. Assessment of global myocardial perfusion reserve using cardiovascular magnetic resonance of coronary sinus flow at 3 tesla. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2014;16(1):24.
van Rossum AC, Visser FC, Hofman MB, Galjee MA, Westerhof N, Valk J. Global left ventricular perfusion: Noninvasive measurement with cine MR imaging and phase velocity mapping of coronary venous outflow. Radiology 1992;182(3):685-691.
Arheden H, Saeed M, Törnqvist E, et al. Accuracy of segmented MR velocity mapping to measure small vessel pulsatile flow in a phantom simulating cardiac motion. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13(5):722-728.
Lund GK, Wendland MF, Shimakawa A, et al. Coronary sinus flow measurement by means of velocity-encoded cine MR imaging: Validation by using flow probes in dogs. Radiology 2000;217(2):487-493.
Schwitter J, DeMarco T, Kneifel S, et al. Magnetic resonance-based assessment of global coronary flow and flow reserve and its relation to left ventricular functional parameters: A comparison with positron emission tomography. Circulation 2000;101(23):2696-2702.
Koskenvuo JW, Sakuma H, Niemi P, et al. Global myocardial blood flow and global flow reserve measurements by MRI and PET are comparable. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13(3):361-366.
Kato S, Fukui K, Saigusa Y, et al. Coronary flow reserve by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with diabetes mellitus. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;12(12):2579-2580.
Kato S, Saito N, Nakachi T, et al. Stress perfusion coronary flow reserve versus cardiac magnetic resonance for known or suspected CAD. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70(7):869-879.
Herring N, Tapoulal N, Kalla M, et al. Neuropeptide-Y causes coronary microvascular constriction and is associated with reduced ejection fraction following ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2019;40(24):1920-1929.
Nakamori S, Sakuma H, Dohi K, et al. Combined assessment of stress myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance and flow measurement in the coronary sinus improves prediction of functionally significant coronary stenosis determined by fractional flow Reserve in Multivessel Disease. J Am Heart Assoc 2018;7(3):e007736.
Shomanova Z, Florian A, Bietenbeck M, Waltenberger J, Sechtem U, Yilmaz A. Diagnostic value of global myocardial perfusion reserve assessment based on coronary sinus flow measurements using cardiovascular magnetic resonance in addition to myocardial stress perfusion imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;18(8):851-859.
Sørensen MH, Bojer AS, Broadbent DA, Plein S, Madsen PL, Gaede P. Cardiac perfusion, structure, and function in type 2 diabetes mellitus with and without diabetic complications. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2020;21(8):887-895.
Biglands J, Magee D, Boyle R, Larghat A, Plein S, Radjenović A. Evaluation of the effect of myocardial segmentation errors on myocardial blood flow estimates from DCE-MRI. Phys Med Biol 2011;56(8):2423-2443.
Jerosch-Herold M, Wilke N, Stillman AE. Magnetic resonance quantification of the myocardial perfusion reserve with a Fermi function model for constrained deconvolution. Med Phys 1998;25(1):73-84.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1996;8(2):135-160.
Bratis K, Mahmoud I, Chiribiri A, Nagel E. Quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography. J Nucl Cardiol 2013;20(5):860-870.
Costa MA, Shoemaker S, Futamatsu H, et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance perfusion imaging detects anatomic and physiologic coronary artery disease as measured by coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50(6):514-522.
Petersen SE, Jerosch-Herold M, Hudsmith LE, et al. Evidence for microvascular dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: New insights from multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2007;115(18):2418-2425.
Aquaro GD, Todiere G, Barison A, et al. Myocardial blood flow and fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Card Fail 2011;17(5):384-391.

Auteurs

Jakob Koefoed Tingsgaard (JK)

Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Martin Heyn Sørensen (MH)

Department of Internal Medicine, Slagelse-Naestved Hospital, Denmark.

Annemie Stege Bojer (AS)

Department of Internal Medicine, Slagelse-Naestved Hospital, Denmark.

Robert H Anderson (RH)

Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, UK.

David Andrew Broadbent (DA)

Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK.
Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Sven Plein (S)

Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Peter Gaede (P)

Department of Internal Medicine, Slagelse-Naestved Hospital, Denmark.

Per Lav Madsen (PL)

Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH