Development and Validation of a Prediction Tool for Reoffending Risk in Domestic Violence.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 07 2023
03 07 2023
Historique:
medline:
27
7
2023
pubmed:
26
7
2023
entrez:
26
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Current risk assessment tools for domestic violence against family members were developed with small and selected samples, have low accuracy with few external validations, and do not report key performance measures. To develop new tools to assess risk of reoffending among individuals who have perpetrated domestic violence. This prognostic study investigated a national cohort of all individuals arrested for domestic violence between 1998 and 2013 in Sweden using information from multiple national registers, including National Crime Register, National Patient Register, Longitudinal Integrated Database for Health Insurance and Labour Market Studies Register, and Multi-Generation Register. Data were analyzed from August 2022 to June 2023. Arrest for domestic violence. Prediction models were developed for 3 reoffending outcomes after arrest for domestic violence: conviction of a new violent crime (including domestic violence), conviction of any new crime, and rearrest for domestic violence at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years. The prediction models were created using sociodemographic factors, criminological factors, and mental health status-related factors, linking data from multiple population-based longitudinal registers. Cox proportional hazard multivariable regression was used to develop prediction models and validate them in external samples. Key performance measures, including discrimination at prespecified cutoffs and calibration statistics, were investigated. The cohort included 27 456 individuals (mean [SD] age, 39.4 [11.6] years; 24 804 men [90.3%]) arrested for domestic violence, of whom 4222 (15.4%) reoffended and were convicted for a new violent crime during a mean (SD) follow-up of 26.5 (27.0) months, 9010 (32.8%) reoffended and were convicted for a new crime (mean [SD] follow-up, 22.4 [25.1] months), and 2080 (7.6%) were rearrested for domestic violence (mean [SD] follow-up, 25.7 [30.6] months). Prediction models were developed with sociodemographic, criminological, and mental health factors and showed good measures of discrimination and calibration for violent reoffending and any reoffending. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for risk of violent reoffending was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.74-0.76) at 1 year, 0.76 (95% CI, 0.75-0.77) at 3 years, and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.75-0.77) 5 years. The AUC for risk of any reoffending was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.75-0.77) at 1 year and at 3 years and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.75-0.76) at 5 years. The model for domestic violence reoffending showed modest discrimination (C index, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.61-0.65) and good calibration. The validation models showed discrimination and calibration performance similar to those of derivation models for all 3 reoffending outcomes. The prediction models have been translated into 3 simple online risk calculators that are freely available to use. This prognostic study developed scalable, evidence-based prediction tools that could support decision-making in criminal justice systems, particularly at the arrest stage when identifying those at higher risk of reoffending and screening out individuals at low risk of reoffending. Furthermore, these tools can enhance treatment allocation by enabling criminal justice services to focus on modifiable risk factors identified in the tools for individuals at high risk of reoffending.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37494041
pii: 2807633
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.25494
pmc: PMC10372708
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2325494Références
Partner Abuse. 2012 Apr;3(2):231-280
pubmed: 22754606
PLoS Med. 2019 Dec 17;16(12):e1002995
pubmed: 31846461
Stat Med. 2004 Jul 15;23(13):2109-23
pubmed: 15211606
Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;9(6):487-524
pubmed: 35569504
Eur Psychiatry. 2017 May;42:134-137
pubmed: 28371726
Ann Epidemiol. 2016 Oct;26(10):723-728
pubmed: 27793275
J Interpers Violence. 2017 Jan;32(2):205-226
pubmed: 25969441
J Interpers Violence. 2019 Nov;34(21-22):4477-4497
pubmed: 27807208
J Crim Justice. 2022 Sep-Oct;82:101935
pubmed: 36530644
Am J Public Health. 2009 Dec;99(12):2182-4
pubmed: 19834003
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Aug;5(8):1021-1026
pubmed: 33737731
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Apr;34(4):423-437
pubmed: 30929112
Ann Intern Med. 2015 May 19;162(10):735-6
pubmed: 25984857
Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;165(2):179-87
pubmed: 18198270
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2011 Mar;30(2):188-94
pubmed: 21355926
Methods Mol Biol. 2011;675:215-20
pubmed: 20949391
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2022 Oct;23(4):1157-1172
pubmed: 33541243
Am J Nurs. 2011 Nov;111(11):26-32; quiz 33-4
pubmed: 22005050
Stat Med. 2009 Jul 10;28(15):1982-98
pubmed: 19452569
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2021 Jan;22(1):18-40
pubmed: 30669956
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Aug 03;17:103
pubmed: 27488658
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e231311
pubmed: 36867408
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020 Aug 3;117(31-32):534-541
pubmed: 33087241
Science. 2019 Oct 25;366(6464):447-453
pubmed: 31649194
PLoS Med. 2013;10(5):e1001439
pubmed: 23671407
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jun 09;11:450
pubmed: 21658213
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;3(6):535-43
pubmed: 27086134
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Aug;71(4):741-53
pubmed: 12924679
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Aug;163(8):1397-403
pubmed: 16877653
Lancet. 2022 Feb 26;399(10327):803-813
pubmed: 35182472