Fetoscopic Laser Ablation of Type II Vasa Previa: A Cost Benefit Analysis.


Journal

American journal of perinatology
ISSN: 1098-8785
Titre abrégé: Am J Perinatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8405212

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Jul 2023
Historique:
medline: 26 7 2023
pubmed: 26 7 2023
entrez: 26 7 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

 We aimed to compare costs of two strategies for third-trimester type II vasa previa management: (1) fetoscopic laser ablation surgery (FLS) referral and (2) standard management (SM).  A decision analytic model and cost-benefit analysis from a health care perspective were performed. The population included patients with type II vasa previa at approximately 32 weeks. SM entailed 32-week antepartum admission and cesarean at approximately 35 weeks. FLS referral included consultation and possible laser surgery at 32 weeks for willing/eligible candidates. Successful laser surgery allowed the possibility of term vaginal delivery. Outcomes included antepartum admission, preterm birth, cesarean, neonatal transfusion, and death. Sensitivity analyses were performed.  In base case analysis, FLS referral was cost saving compared with SM (total cost per patient $65,717.10 vs. 71,628.16). FLS referrals yielded fewer antepartum admissions, cesareans, premature births, neonatal transfusions, and deaths. Eligible referred patients choosing FLS incurred a total cost of $41,702.46, a >40% decrease compared with SM. FLS referral was cost saving in all one-way sensitivity analyses except when antepartum admission costs were low. In threshold analyses, FLS referral was cost saving unless laser surgery cost was >$39,892 (2.75x expected cost), antepartum admission cost for monitoring of vasa previa or ruptured membranes was <$7,455, <11% patients were eligible for laser surgery, and when <12% of eligible patients chose laser surgery. In two-way sensitivity analysis, FLS referral was cost saving except at very high laser surgery costs and extremely low antepartum admission costs.  Referral for FLS for type II vasa previa was cost saving and improved outcomes compared with SM, despite upfront costs, fetoscopy-related risks, and many patients being ineligible or not opting for surgery after referral. · Vasa previa rupture may lead to fetal exsanguination and death.. · Late preterm cesarean is common practice for prenatally diagnosed vasa previa.. · Successful fetoscopic laser ablation for type II vasa previa has been described.. · Laser ablation of vasa previa allows for a safe-term vaginal delivery.. · Referral for laser surgery is cost saving and is associated with improved outcomes..

Identifiants

pubmed: 37494587
doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771262
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Thieme. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

None declared.

Auteurs

Martha A Monson (MA)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Intermountain Health, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Ramen H Chmait (RH)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

Brett Einerson (B)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Intermountain Health, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Classifications MeSH