An Examination of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Use of Prostate Biopsy and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Screening.


Journal

Urology practice
ISSN: 2352-0787
Titre abrégé: Urol Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101635343

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2023
Historique:
medline: 23 10 2023
pubmed: 27 7 2023
entrez: 27 7 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We assessed racial and ethnic disparities in the use of prostate biopsy or MRI following an elevated PSA result. We retrospectively evaluated insurance claims from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart database from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2017. This was a large commercially insured cohort from across the United States. We included all male enrollees over 40 years old receiving an elevated PSA result with no prior prostate biopsy or MRI and no confirmed urinary tract infection within 6 weeks of PSA test. A total of 765,409 participants met inclusion criteria with 43,711 (5.71%) receiving a PSA result above 4 ng/mL. Of these, 7,399 received either a prostate biopsy or MRI within 180 days. Men between ages 40-54 (29.48%) were most likely to receive prostate biopsy or MRI after an elevated PSA, followed by those between 55-64 (24.91%), 65-74 (18.56%), 75-84 (6.33%), and above 85 (3.62%). Compared to White patients, Black patients were more likely to receive either a prostate biopsy or MRI (OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.32) following an elevated PSA level, while Asian (OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.54, 0.96) and Hispanic (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70, 0/97) patients were less likely. Physicians appear to be following the reported statistical incidence of prostate cancer by race and ethnicity when using prostate biopsy or MRI for patients with elevated PSA levels. These results demonstrate the importance of publishing statistical data on disease incidence by race and ethnicity for informing physicians' decision-making.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37498656
doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000435
doi:

Substances chimiques

Prostate-Specific Antigen EC 3.4.21.77

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

612-619

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Auteurs

Nicholas Chartrand (N)

College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona.

Chad Stecher (C)

College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona.

Shubhsri Rajendra (S)

School of Economics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia.

Andrew B Rosenkrantz (AB)

Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.

Richard Duszak (R)

Department Radiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi.

Danny R Hughes (DR)

College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH