Treatment Satisfaction and Well-Being With CGM in People With T1D: An Analysis Based on the GOLD Randomized Trial.

CGMS MDI SMBG quality of life treatment satisfaction type 1 diabetes

Journal

Journal of diabetes science and technology
ISSN: 1932-2968
Titre abrégé: J Diabetes Sci Technol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101306166

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Jul 2023
Historique:
medline: 28 7 2023
pubmed: 28 7 2023
entrez: 28 7 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The GOLD trial demonstrated that continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) managed with multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) improved not only glucose control but also overall well-being and treatment satisfaction. This analysis investigated which factors contributed to improved well-being and treatment satisfaction with CGM. The GOLD trial was a randomized crossover trial comparing CGM versus self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) over 16 months. Endpoints included well-being measured by the World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) and treatment satisfaction by the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) as well as glucose metrics. Multivariable R A total of 139 participants were included. Multivariable analyses revealed that increased convenience and flexibility contributed to 60% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 50%-69%) of the improvement in treatment satisfaction (Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire While CGM improves glucose control in people with T1D on MDI, increased convenience and flexibility through CGM is of even greater importance for treatment satisfaction and patient well-being. These CGM-mediated effects should be taken into account when considering CGM initiation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
The GOLD trial demonstrated that continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) managed with multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) improved not only glucose control but also overall well-being and treatment satisfaction. This analysis investigated which factors contributed to improved well-being and treatment satisfaction with CGM.
METHODS UNASSIGNED
The GOLD trial was a randomized crossover trial comparing CGM versus self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) over 16 months. Endpoints included well-being measured by the World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) and treatment satisfaction by the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) as well as glucose metrics. Multivariable R
RESULTS UNASSIGNED
A total of 139 participants were included. Multivariable analyses revealed that increased convenience and flexibility contributed to 60% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 50%-69%) of the improvement in treatment satisfaction (Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire
CONCLUSIONS UNASSIGNED
While CGM improves glucose control in people with T1D on MDI, increased convenience and flexibility through CGM is of even greater importance for treatment satisfaction and patient well-being. These CGM-mediated effects should be taken into account when considering CGM initiation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37501366
doi: 10.1177/19322968231183974
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

19322968231183974

Auteurs

Daniel Pylov (D)

Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

William Polonsky (W)

Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, CA, USA.
University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.

Henrik Imberg (H)

Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Statistiska Konsultgruppen, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Helen Holmer (H)

Department of Internal Medicine, Centralsjukhuset, Kristianstad, Sweden.

Jarl Hellman (J)

Department of Medical Sciences, Clinical Diabetes and Metabolism, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Magnus Wijkman (M)

Department of Internal Medicine and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden.

Jan Bolinder (J)

Department of Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Sofia Dahlqvist (S)

Department of Medicine, NU Hospital Group, Uddevalla, Sweden.

Thomas Nyström (T)

Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Erik Schwarz (E)

Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Health, Örebro University, Örebro Sweden.

Irl Hirsch (I)

School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Marcus Lind (M)

Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Medicine, NU Hospital Group, Uddevalla, Sweden.

Classifications MeSH