Use of Sociodemographic Information in Clinical Vignettes of Multiple-Choice Questions for Preclinical Medical Students.

Purpose

This paper aims to characterize the use of demographic data in multiple-choice questions from a commercial preclinical question bank and determine if there is appropriate use of different distractors.

Background

Multiple-choice questions for medical students often include vignettes describing a patient's presentation to help guide students to a diagnosis, but overall patterns of usage between different types of nonmedical patient information in question stems have yet to be determined.

Methods

Three hundred eighty of 453 randomly selected questions were included for analysis after determining they contained a clinical vignette and required a diagnosis. The vignettes and following explanations were then examined for the presence/absence of 11 types of demographic information, including age, sex/gender, and socioeconomic status. We compared both the usage frequency and relevance between the 11 information types.

Results

Most information types were present in less than 10% of clinical vignettes, but age and sex/gender were present in over 95% of question stems. Over 50% of questions included irrelevant information about age and sex/gender, but 75% of questions did not include any irrelevant information of other types. Patient weight and environmental exposures were significantly more likely to be relevant than age or sex/gender.

Discussion

Students using the questions in this study will frequently gain practice incorporating age and sex/gender into their clinical reasoning while receiving little exposure to other demographic information. Based on our findings, we posit that questions could include more irrelevant information, outside age and sex/gender, to better approximate real clinical scenarios and ensure students do not overvalue certain demographic data.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-023-01778-z.

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) under exclusive licence to International Association of Medical Science Educators 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of InterestThe authors declare no competing interests.