Development and application of proficiency testing (PT) to evaluate the diagnostic capacity of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-qPCR - A practical and metrological approach.
Metrology
Proficiency testing
RT-PCR, Quality management
SARs-CoV-2
Journal
Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease
ISSN: 1879-0070
Titre abrégé: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8305899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
18
04
2023
revised:
06
07
2023
accepted:
08
07
2023
medline:
28
8
2023
pubmed:
29
7
2023
entrez:
28
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
It is necessary to use quality tools to evaluate the diagnostic capacity of laboratories, such as implementing a proficiency testing (PT) program. The goal of this work is to develop and apply a PT protocol to assess the diagnostic capacity of SARS-CoV-2 through the RT-PCR method, based on appropriate metrological tools. A 5-item test panel containing items with different dilutions of SARS-CoV-2, including negative controls, was developed to perform this PT with the application of different performance assessment tools to score and differentiate performance between laboratories, according to Table 2. Based on the participants' total qualitative result, 95% of the negative samples and 73% of the positive samples were correctly identified by the laboratories. The results obtained were compared e validate the systematics of the PT developed, so that it can be implemented and used to monitor and improve the diagnostic capacity of SARS-CoV-2, also helping to improve the quality of these results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37506595
pii: S0732-8893(23)00131-1
doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2023.116021
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
RNA, Viral
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
116021Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.