Study Replication: Shape Discrimination in a Conditioning Procedure on the Jumping Spider
Gestalt
amodal completion
invertebrates
learning
vision
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Jul 2023
17 Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
29
04
2023
revised:
05
07
2023
accepted:
13
07
2023
medline:
29
7
2023
pubmed:
29
7
2023
entrez:
29
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Spiders possess a unique visual system, split into eight different eyes and divided into two fully independent visual pathways. This peculiar organization begs the question of how visual information is processed, and whether the classically recognized Gestalt rules of perception hold true. In a previous experiment, we tested the ability of jumping spiders to associate a geometrical shape with a reward (sucrose solution), and then to generalize the learned association to a partially occluded version of the shape. The occluded shape was presented together with a broken version of the same shape. The former should be perceived as a whole shape only in the case the animals, like humans, are able to amodally complete an object partly hidden by an occluder; otherwise, the two shapes would be perceived as identical. There, the spiders learned the association but failed to generalize. Here, we present a replication of the experiment, with an increased number of subjects, a DeepLabCut-based scoring procedure, and an improved statistical analysis. The results of the experiment follow closely the direction of the effects observed in the previous work but fail to rise to significance. We discuss the importance of study replication, and we especially highlight the use of automated scoring procedures to maximize objectivity in behavioral studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37508103
pii: ani13142326
doi: 10.3390/ani13142326
pmc: PMC10376405
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Comp Physiol A. 2000 Sep;186(9):897-901
pubmed: 11085642
Behav Processes. 2014 Mar;103:192-8
pubmed: 24406509
Perception. 2000;29(12):1483-97
pubmed: 11257971
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 03;9(6):e97819
pubmed: 24893306
Perception. 2008;37(4):557-70
pubmed: 18546663
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2006 Aug;192(8):871-8
pubmed: 16598507
J Exp Biol. 1972 Aug;57(1):15-40
pubmed: 5075890
Nat Methods. 2020 Mar;17(3):261-272
pubmed: 32015543
Perception. 1993;22(6):713-21
pubmed: 8255701
J Neurosci Methods. 2020 Dec 1;346:108925
pubmed: 32896539
Vision Res. 2012 Aug 1;66:26-30
pubmed: 22750020
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 2;17(3):e0264127
pubmed: 35235595
Int J Plant Sci. 1999 Nov;160(S6):S51-S65
pubmed: 10572022
PLoS Biol. 2021 Jul 15;19(7):e3001172
pubmed: 34264925
Anim Cogn. 2008 Jan;11(1):161-6
pubmed: 17636365
J Exp Biol. 2000 Nov;203(Pt 22):3485-94
pubmed: 11044386
J Exp Biol. 1971 Feb;54(1):119-39
pubmed: 5549757
Anim Cogn. 2005 Jan;8(1):60-6
pubmed: 15322943
J Neurosci Methods. 2014 Mar 30;225:106-19
pubmed: 24491637
J Exp Biol. 2000 Nov;203(Pt 21):3289-98
pubmed: 11023849
Perception. 2012;41(2):148-67
pubmed: 22670344
Curr Biol. 2015 May 18;25(10):R403-4
pubmed: 25989075
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jul 17;13(14):
pubmed: 37508103
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2005 Oct;31(4):387-98
pubmed: 16248725
Nat Neurosci. 2018 Sep;21(9):1281-1289
pubmed: 30127430
J Gen Physiol. 1975 Aug;66(2):193-207
pubmed: 1176947
Front Physiol. 2017 Feb 06;8:40
pubmed: 28220075
J Exp Biol. 2010 Jul 15;213(Pt 14):2372-8
pubmed: 20581266
Nature. 1996 Aug 1;382(6590):458-61
pubmed: 18610516
Percept Psychophys. 1995 Oct;57(7):971-6
pubmed: 8532500
Science. 2011 Dec 2;334(6060):1272-5
pubmed: 22144625
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Jul 12;284(1858):
pubmed: 28701553
J Exp Biol. 2009 Jul;212(Pt 14):2129-32
pubmed: 19561201