First estimates of fine root production in tropical peat swamp and terra firme forests of the central Congo Basin.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 07 2023
Historique:
received: 10 10 2022
accepted: 07 07 2023
medline: 31 7 2023
pubmed: 30 7 2023
entrez: 29 7 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Tropical peatlands are carbon-dense ecosystems because they accumulate partially-decomposed plant material. A substantial fraction of this organic matter may derive from fine root production (FRP). However, few FRP estimates exist for tropical peatlands, with none from the world's largest peatland complex in the central Congo Basin. Here we report on FRP using repeat photographs of roots from in situ transparent tubes (minirhizotrons), measured to 1 m depth over three one-month periods (spanning dry to wet seasons), in a palm-dominated peat swamp forest, a hardwood-dominated peat swamp forest, and a terra firme forest. We find FRP of 2.6 ± 0.3 Mg C ha

Identifiants

pubmed: 37516765
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38409-x
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-38409-x
pmc: PMC10387053
doi:

Substances chimiques

RNA, Long Noncoding 0
Soil 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

12315

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Environ Exp Bot. 2001 Jun;45(3):263-289
pubmed: 11323033
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Nov 27;366(1582):3225-45
pubmed: 22006964
Oecologia. 1996 Nov;108(3):389-411
pubmed: 28307854
New Phytol. 2019 Jan;221(1):233-246
pubmed: 30067293
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Aug;27(15):3657-3680
pubmed: 33982340
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23533
pubmed: 21858157
Plant Methods. 2019 Aug 28;15:101
pubmed: 31467587
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Dec;27(24):6423-6435
pubmed: 34469626
Science. 2008 Jan 25;319(5862):456-8
pubmed: 18218895
Plant Environ Interact. 2020 Apr 22;1(1):3-16
pubmed: 37284129
Nature. 2017 Feb 2;542(7639):86-90
pubmed: 28077869
New Phytol. 2021 Nov;232(4):1591-1602
pubmed: 34018616

Auteurs

Matteo Sciumbata (M)

Section Systems Ecology, Amsterdam Institute for Life and Environment (A-LIFE), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.sciumbata@vu.nl.

Yeto Emmanuel Mampouya Wenina (YEM)

École Normale Supérieure, Departement des sciences et vie de la terre, Université Marien Ngouabi, Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo.

Mackline Mbemba (M)

École Normale Supérieure, Departement des sciences et vie de la terre, Université Marien Ngouabi, Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo.

Greta C Dargie (GC)

School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Andy J Baird (AJ)

School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Paul J Morris (PJ)

School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Suspense Averti Ifo (SA)

École Normale Supérieure, Departement des sciences et vie de la terre, Université Marien Ngouabi, Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo.

Rien Aerts (R)

Section Systems Ecology, Amsterdam Institute for Life and Environment (A-LIFE), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Simon L Lewis (SL)

School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Department of Geography, University College London, London, UK.

Articles similaires

Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi
Lakes Salinity Archaea Bacteria Microbiota
Rivers Turkey Biodiversity Environmental Monitoring Animals
1.00
Iran Environmental Monitoring Seasons Ecosystem Forests

Classifications MeSH