Auditory outcomes after scala vestibuli array insertion are similar to those after scala tympani insertion 1 year after cochlear implantation.

Auditory performance Auditory rehabilitation Cochlear ossification Hearing loss Speech discrimination

Journal

European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1434-4726
Titre abrégé: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9002937

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Jul 2023
Historique:
received: 19 03 2023
accepted: 03 07 2023
medline: 30 7 2023
pubmed: 30 7 2023
entrez: 30 7 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

In cochlear implantation, a scala vestibuli (SV) insertion of an electrode array is a rare occurrence and is reported to be linked to poor hearing outcomes. Using the same electrode array, the auditory performance of patients with a complete SV location was compared with that of patients having a complete scala tympani (ST) location 1 year after implantation. Thirty-three patients were included in this retrospective case-control study (SV, n = 12; ST, n = 21). The matching criteria were electrode array type, age at implantation, and duration of severe or profound deafness. The array location was analyzed using 3D reconstruction of postoperative CT scans. Postoperative audiological evaluation of the implanted ear was performed using pure-tone audiometry, speech recognition of monosyllabic words in quiet, and words and sentences in noise. On the preoperative CT scan, six patients in the SV group presented with both round window (RW) and ST ossification, three with RW ossification alone, and three with no RW ossification. Auditory performance did not differ between SV and ST groups 1 year after cochlear implantation. Speech recognition of words was 49 ± 7.6% and 56 ± 5.0% in quiet and 75 ± 9.5% and 66 ± 6.0% in noise in SV and ST groups, respectively. ST insertion is the gold standard that allows the three cochlear scalae to preserve scalar cochlear integrity. However, 1 year after implantation, a planned or unexpected SV insertion is not detrimental to hearing outcomes, providing similar auditory performance in quiet and noise to ST insertion.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37516989
doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08107-5
pii: 10.1007/s00405-023-08107-5
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Fondation Pour l'Audition
ID : FPA CRA02
Organisme : Fondation pour l'Audition
ID : Starting Grant IDA-2020
Organisme : ANR Robocop
ID : ANR-19-CE19-0026-02

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Wanna GB, Noble JH, Carlson ML et al (2014) Impact of electrode design and surgical approach on scalar location and cochlear implant outcomes. Laryngoscope 124(Suppl 6):S1-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24728
doi: 10.1002/lary.24728 pubmed: 24764083 pmcid: 4209201
O’Connell BP, Cakir A, Hunter JB et al (2016) Electrode location and angular insertion depth are predictors of audiologic outcomes in cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 37:1016–1023. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001125
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001125 pubmed: 27348391 pmcid: 4983244
Connor SE, Holland NJ, Agger A et al (2012) Round window electrode insertion potentiates retention in the scala tympani. Acta Otolaryngol 132:932–937. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489.2012.680493
doi: 10.3109/00016489.2012.680493 pubmed: 22667826
Fischer N, Pinggera L, Weichbold V et al (2015) Radiologic and functional evaluation of electrode dislocation from the scala tympani to the scala vestibuli in patients with cochlear implants. Am J Neuroradiol 36:372–377. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4189
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4189 pubmed: 25430856 pmcid: 7965666
Eisenhut F, Taha L, Kleibe I et al (2020) Fusion of preoperative MRI and postoperative FD-CT for direct evaluation of Cochlear implants: an analysis at 1.5 T and 3 T. Clin Neuroradiol 30:729–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-019-00853-6
doi: 10.1007/s00062-019-00853-6 pubmed: 31754757
Daoudi H, Lahlou G, Torres R et al (2021) Robot-assisted Cochlear implant electrode array insertion in adults: a comparative study with manual insertion. Otol Neurotol 42:e438–e444. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000003002
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003002 pubmed: 33306661
Dong Y, Briaire JJ, Siebrecht M, Stronks HC, Frijns JHM (2021) Detection of translocation of Cochlear implant electrode arrays by intracochlear impedance measurements. Ear Hear 42:1397–1404. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001033
doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001033 pubmed: 33974777 pmcid: 8378542
Torres R, Daoudi H, Lahlou G et al (2021) Restoration of high frequency auditory perception after robot-assisted or manual cochlear implantation in profoundly deaf adults improves speech recognition. Front Surg 10(8):729736. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.729736
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.729736
Gulya AJ, Steenerson RL (1996) The scala vestibuli for cochlear implantation. An anatomic study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122:130–132. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1996.01890140020005
doi: 10.1001/archotol.1996.01890140020005 pubmed: 8630205
Shaul C, Dragovic AS, Stringer AK et al (2018) Scalar localisation of peri-modiolar electrodes and speech perception outcomes. J Laryngol Otol 132:1000–1006. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215118001871
doi: 10.1017/S0022215118001871 pubmed: 30370884
Wanna GB, Noble JH, Gifford RH et al (2015) Impact of intrascalar electrode location, electrode type, and angular insertion depth on residual hearing in cochlear implant patients: preliminary results. Otol Neurotol 36:1343–1348. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000829
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000829 pubmed: 26176556 pmcid: 7187917
Riggs WJ, Dwyer RT, Holder JT et al (2019) Intracochlear electrocochleography: influence of scalar position of the cochlear implant electrode on postinsertion results. Otol Neurotol 40:e503–e510. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000002202
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002202 pubmed: 31083085 pmcid: 6530483
Gantz BJ, McCabe BF, Tyler RS (1988) Use of multichannel cochlear implants in obstructed and obliterated cochleas. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 98:72–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/019459988809800113
doi: 10.1177/019459988809800113 pubmed: 3124055
Zhang N, Dong R, Zheng J et al (2022) Cochlear implantation for post-meningitis deafness with cochlear ossification: diagnosis and surgical strategy. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 142:369–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2022.2077433
doi: 10.1080/00016489.2022.2077433 pubmed: 35654417
Hassepass F, Schild C, Aschendorff A et al (2013) Clinical outcome after cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral hearing loss due to labyrinthitis ossificans. Otol Neurotol 34:1278–1283. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182937ad4
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182937ad4 pubmed: 23921941
Vashishth A, Fulcheri A, Prasad SC et al (2018) Cochlear implantation in cochlear ossification: retrospective review of etiologies, surgical considerations, and auditory outcomes. Otol Neurotol 39:17–28. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001613
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001613 pubmed: 29065093
Wang L, Zhang D (2014) Surgical methods and postoperative results of cochlear implantation in 79 cases of ossified cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 134:1219–1224. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489.2014.947656
doi: 10.3109/00016489.2014.947656 pubmed: 25399880
Stuermer K, Winter T, Nachtsheim L et al (2021) Round window accessibility during cochlear implantation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 278:363–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06095-4
doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06095-4 pubmed: 32506146
Jwair S, van Eijden JJM, Blijleven EE et al (2022) Radiological and surgical aspects of round window visibility during cochlear implantation: a retrospective analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 279:67–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06611-0
doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06611-0 pubmed: 33471167
Adunka O, Kiefer J, Unkelbach MH et al (2005) Evaluating cochlear implant trauma to the scala vestibuli. Clin Otolaryngol 30:121–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00935.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00935.x pubmed: 15839863
Lin Y-S (2009) Clinical outcomes of scala vestibuli cochlear implantation in children with partial labyrinthine ossification. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 129:273–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016480802032819
doi: 10.1080/00016480802032819 pubmed: 19229677
Trudel M, Côté M, Philippon D et al (2018) Comparative impacts of scala vestibuli versus scala tympani cochlear implantation on auditory performances and programming parameters in partially ossified cochleae. Otol Neurotol 39:700–706. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001816
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001816 pubmed: 29702527
Aschendorff A, Kromeier J, Klenzner T, Laszig R (2007) Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults. Ear Hear 28:75S-79S. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e318031542e
doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318031542e pubmed: 17496653
Kiefer J, Weber A, Pfennigdorff T, von Ilberg C (2000) Scala vestibuli insertion in cochlear implantation: a valuable alternative for cases with obstructed scala tympani. J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 62:251–256. https://doi.org/10.1159/000027755
doi: 10.1159/000027755
Smullen JL, Balkany TJ (2005) Implantation of the ossified Cochlea. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 16:117–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otot.2005.03.005
doi: 10.1016/j.otot.2005.03.005
Torres R, Tinevez J-Y, Daoudi H et al (2022) Best fit 3D basilar membrane reconstruction to routinely assess the scalar position of the electrode array after Cochlear implantation. J Clin Med 11:2075. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11082075
doi: 10.3390/jcm11082075 pubmed: 35456169 pmcid: 9030636
Monsell EM, Balkany TA, Gates GA et al (1995) Committee on hearing and equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma). Mosby-Year Book Inc, St Louis
Steenerson RL, Gary LB, Wynens MS (1990) Scala vestibuli cochlear implantation for labyrinthine ossification. Am J Otol 11:360–363
pubmed: 2122734
Holden LK, Finley CC, Firszt JB et al (2013) Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 34:342–360. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182741aa7
doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182741aa7 pubmed: 23348845 pmcid: 3636188
Lin K, Marrinan MS, Waltzman SB, Roland JT (2006) Multichannel cochlear implantation in the scala vestibuli. Otol Neurotol 27:634–638. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mao.0000224095.63354.1a
doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000224095.63354.1a pubmed: 16788421
Adunka OF, Radeloff A, Gstoettner WK et al (2007) Scala tympani cochleostomy II: topography and histology. Laryngoscope 117:2195–2200. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLG.0b013e3181453a53
doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e3181453a53 pubmed: 17909447
Berrettini S, Forli F, Passetti S (2008) Preservation of residual hearing following cochlear implantation: comparison between three surgical techniques. J Laryngol Otol 122:246–252. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215107000254
doi: 10.1017/S0022215107000254 pubmed: 17666134
Briggs RJS, Tykocinski M, Stidham K, Roberson JB (2005) Cochleostomy site: implications for electrode placement and hearing preservation. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 125:870–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016480510031489
doi: 10.1080/00016480510031489 pubmed: 16158535
Bauer PW, Roland PS (2004) Clinical results with the Med-El compressed and split arrays in the United States. Laryngoscope 114:428–433. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200403000-00009
doi: 10.1097/00005537-200403000-00009 pubmed: 15091214
Hoffmann JAC, Warnecke A, Timm ME et al (2022) Cochlear implantation in obliterated Cochlea: a retrospective analysis and comparison between the IES stiff custom-made device and the split-array and regular electrodes. J Clin Med 11:6090. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11206090
doi: 10.3390/jcm11206090 pubmed: 36294411 pmcid: 9605638
Öztürk K, Göde S, Çelik S et al (2016) Revisiting the anatomy of the facial recess: the boundaries of the round window exposure. Balk Med J 33:552–555. https://doi.org/10.5152/balkanmedj.2016.150864
doi: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2016.150864
Kelsall D, Lupo J, Biever A (2021) Longitudinal outcomes of cochlear implantation and bimodal hearing in a large group of adults: a multicenter clinical study. Am J Otolaryngol 42:102773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102773
doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102773 pubmed: 33161258
De Seta D, Nguyen Y, Bonnard D (2016) The role of electrode placement in bilateral simultaneously cochlear-implanted adult patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 155:485–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599816645774
doi: 10.1177/0194599816645774 pubmed: 27165685
Millar DA, Hillman TA, Shelton C (2005) Implantation of the ossified cochlea: management with the split electrode array. Laryngoscope 115:2155–2160. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.MLG.0000181494.21654.5E
doi: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000181494.21654.5E pubmed: 16369159

Auteurs

Wenxi Gu (W)

APHP/Sorbonne Université, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service ORL, Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs Et Explorations Fonctionnelles, 50-52 Boulevard Vincent Auriol, 75013, Paris, France.
Institut Pasteur/Université Paris Cité/Inserm, Institut de L'Audition, Technologie Et Thérapie Génique Pour La Surdité, 63 Rue de Charenton, 75012, Paris, France.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine On Ear and Nose Diseases (14DZ2260300), Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Hannah Daoudi (H)

APHP/Sorbonne Université, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service ORL, Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs Et Explorations Fonctionnelles, 50-52 Boulevard Vincent Auriol, 75013, Paris, France.
Institut Pasteur/Université Paris Cité/Inserm, Institut de L'Audition, Technologie Et Thérapie Génique Pour La Surdité, 63 Rue de Charenton, 75012, Paris, France.

Ghizlene Lahlou (G)

APHP/Sorbonne Université, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service ORL, Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs Et Explorations Fonctionnelles, 50-52 Boulevard Vincent Auriol, 75013, Paris, France.
Institut Pasteur/Université Paris Cité/Inserm, Institut de L'Audition, Technologie Et Thérapie Génique Pour La Surdité, 63 Rue de Charenton, 75012, Paris, France.

Olivier Sterkers (O)

APHP/Sorbonne Université, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service ORL, Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs Et Explorations Fonctionnelles, 50-52 Boulevard Vincent Auriol, 75013, Paris, France.
Institut Pasteur/Université Paris Cité/Inserm, Institut de L'Audition, Technologie Et Thérapie Génique Pour La Surdité, 63 Rue de Charenton, 75012, Paris, France.

Evelyne Ferrary (E)

APHP/Sorbonne Université, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service ORL, Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs Et Explorations Fonctionnelles, 50-52 Boulevard Vincent Auriol, 75013, Paris, France.
Institut Pasteur/Université Paris Cité/Inserm, Institut de L'Audition, Technologie Et Thérapie Génique Pour La Surdité, 63 Rue de Charenton, 75012, Paris, France.

Yann Nguyen (Y)

APHP/Sorbonne Université, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service ORL, Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs Et Explorations Fonctionnelles, 50-52 Boulevard Vincent Auriol, 75013, Paris, France.
Institut Pasteur/Université Paris Cité/Inserm, Institut de L'Audition, Technologie Et Thérapie Génique Pour La Surdité, 63 Rue de Charenton, 75012, Paris, France.

Isabelle Mosnier (I)

APHP/Sorbonne Université, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service ORL, Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs Et Explorations Fonctionnelles, 50-52 Boulevard Vincent Auriol, 75013, Paris, France.
Institut Pasteur/Université Paris Cité/Inserm, Institut de L'Audition, Technologie Et Thérapie Génique Pour La Surdité, 63 Rue de Charenton, 75012, Paris, France.

Renato Torres (R)

APHP/Sorbonne Université, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service ORL, Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs Et Explorations Fonctionnelles, 50-52 Boulevard Vincent Auriol, 75013, Paris, France. victor.torres-lazo@pasteur.fr.
Institut Pasteur/Université Paris Cité/Inserm, Institut de L'Audition, Technologie Et Thérapie Génique Pour La Surdité, 63 Rue de Charenton, 75012, Paris, France. victor.torres-lazo@pasteur.fr.
Departamento de Ciencias Fisiológicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de San Agustín de Arequipa, Arequipa, Peru. victor.torres-lazo@pasteur.fr.

Classifications MeSH