Exploring the natural history of intrinsic capacity impairments: longitudinal patterns in the 10/66 study.
intrinsic capacity
latent transitions
longitudinal analysis
natural history of functional decline
older people
Journal
Age and ageing
ISSN: 1468-2834
Titre abrégé: Age Ageing
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0375655
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 07 2023
01 07 2023
Historique:
received:
18
12
2022
medline:
1
8
2023
pubmed:
30
7
2023
entrez:
30
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
intrinsic capacity (IC) is a construct encompassing people's physical and mental abilities. There is an implicit link amongst IC domains: cognition, locomotion, nutrition, sensory and psychological. However, little is known about the integration of the domains. to investigate patterns in the presentation and evolution of IC domain impairments in low-and-middle-income countries and if such patterns were associated with adverse outcomes. secondary analyses of the first two waves of the 10/66 study (population-based surveys conducted in eight urban and four rural catchment areas in Cuba, Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico, Venezuela, Peru, Mexico and China). We applied latent transition analysis on IC to find latent statuses (latent clusters) of IC domain impairments. We evaluated the longitudinal association of the latent statuses with the risk of frailty, disability and mortality, and tested concurrent and predictive validity. amongst 14,923 participants included, the four latent statuses were: high IC (43%), low deterioration with impaired locomotion (17%), high deterioration without cognitive impairment (22%), and high deterioration with cognitive impairment (18%). A total of 61% of the participants worsened over time, 35% were stable, and 3% improved to a healthier status.Participants with deteriorated IC had a significantly higher risk of frailty, disability and dementia than people with high IC. There was strong concurrent and predictive validity. (Mortality Hazard Ratio = 4.60, 95%CI 4.16; 5.09; Harrel's C = 0.73 (95%CI 0.72;0.74)). half of the study population had high IC at baseline, and most participants followed a worsening trend. Four qualitatively different IC statuses or statuses were characterised by low and high levels of deterioration associated with their risk of disability and frailty. Locomotion and cognition impairments showed other trends than psychological and nutrition domains across the latent statuses.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
intrinsic capacity (IC) is a construct encompassing people's physical and mental abilities. There is an implicit link amongst IC domains: cognition, locomotion, nutrition, sensory and psychological. However, little is known about the integration of the domains.
OBJECTIVES
to investigate patterns in the presentation and evolution of IC domain impairments in low-and-middle-income countries and if such patterns were associated with adverse outcomes.
METHODS
secondary analyses of the first two waves of the 10/66 study (population-based surveys conducted in eight urban and four rural catchment areas in Cuba, Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico, Venezuela, Peru, Mexico and China). We applied latent transition analysis on IC to find latent statuses (latent clusters) of IC domain impairments. We evaluated the longitudinal association of the latent statuses with the risk of frailty, disability and mortality, and tested concurrent and predictive validity.
RESULTS
amongst 14,923 participants included, the four latent statuses were: high IC (43%), low deterioration with impaired locomotion (17%), high deterioration without cognitive impairment (22%), and high deterioration with cognitive impairment (18%). A total of 61% of the participants worsened over time, 35% were stable, and 3% improved to a healthier status.Participants with deteriorated IC had a significantly higher risk of frailty, disability and dementia than people with high IC. There was strong concurrent and predictive validity. (Mortality Hazard Ratio = 4.60, 95%CI 4.16; 5.09; Harrel's C = 0.73 (95%CI 0.72;0.74)).
CONCLUSIONS
half of the study population had high IC at baseline, and most participants followed a worsening trend. Four qualitatively different IC statuses or statuses were characterised by low and high levels of deterioration associated with their risk of disability and frailty. Locomotion and cognition impairments showed other trends than psychological and nutrition domains across the latent statuses.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37517058
pii: 7232308
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad137
pmc: PMC10387229
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : GR08002
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : GR066133
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K01 AG073526
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society.
Références
Lancet. 2003 Mar 15;361(9361):909-17
pubmed: 12648969
World Health Stat Q. 1988;41(1):32-6
pubmed: 3376487
Maturitas. 2022 Jul;161:49-54
pubmed: 35688495
J Frailty Aging. 2021;10(2):103-109
pubmed: 33575698
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022 Jan 7;77(1):94-100
pubmed: 34343305
J Nutr Health Aging. 2022;26(10):918-925
pubmed: 36259580
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2021 Jul 05;17:389-394
pubmed: 34262283
Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Dec;195(6):510-5
pubmed: 19949200
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 09;8:751586
pubmed: 34957141
Age Ageing. 2017 Nov 1;46(6):932-939
pubmed: 28985329
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2023 Apr;14(2):930-939
pubmed: 36660894
BMC Public Health. 2007 Jul 20;7:165
pubmed: 17659078
J Affect Disord. 2010 Feb;121(1-2):52-8
pubmed: 19464735
PLoS Med. 2021 Sep 14;18(9):e1003097
pubmed: 34520466
Soc Sci Med. 1994 Jan;38(1):1-14
pubmed: 8146699
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 5;11(1):e043062
pubmed: 33402410
J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 Jun;56(6):507-14
pubmed: 12873644
Clin Geriatr Med. 2007 Nov;23(4):735-56, v
pubmed: 17923335
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022 Jun;3(6):e394-e404
pubmed: 36098317
J Nutr Health Aging. 2006 Nov-Dec;10(6):466-85; discussion 485-7
pubmed: 17183419
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2018 Nov 10;73(12):1653-1660
pubmed: 29408961
Lancet. 2016 May 21;387(10033):2145-2154
pubmed: 26520231
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Apr;19(4):287-295.e4
pubmed: 29306607
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 2;9(11):e026119
pubmed: 31678933
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2021 May-Jun;94:104358
pubmed: 33548677
Front Aging Neurosci. 2023 Feb 06;15:1069439
pubmed: 36815174
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Apr 15;20(1):138
pubmed: 32293307
J Frailty Aging. 2021;10(2):94-102
pubmed: 33575697
BMC Med. 2015 Jun 10;13:138
pubmed: 26063168
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1991;240(4-5):212-7
pubmed: 1828994
JAAPA. 2019 Jul;32(7):51-53
pubmed: 31241612
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Apr 1;46(2):406-406i
pubmed: 27154633
Geriatr Nurs. 2022 May-Jun;45:223-229
pubmed: 35576783
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Sep 28;8:753295
pubmed: 34651003
J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(1):33-40
pubmed: 33367460
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Nov 30;7:576079
pubmed: 33330532
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;30(6):647-54
pubmed: 25315155
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56
pubmed: 11253156
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Nov;39(23):2347-2380
pubmed: 27820966
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Apr 8;22(1):304
pubmed: 35395736
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;27(10):1072-1079
pubmed: 31109899