Results from a new efficacy and safety analysis of the REGENERATE trial of obeticholic acid for treatment of pre-cirrhotic fibrosis due to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.

Liver fibrosis NASH OCA nonalcoholic steatohepatitis obeticholic acid

Journal

Journal of hepatology
ISSN: 1600-0641
Titre abrégé: J Hepatol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8503886

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 20 04 2023
revised: 30 06 2023
accepted: 06 07 2023
pubmed: 31 7 2023
medline: 31 7 2023
entrez: 30 7 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Obeticholic acid (OCA) is a first-in-class farnesoid X receptor agonist and antifibrotic agent in development for the treatment of pre-cirrhotic liver fibrosis due to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). We aimed to validate the original 18-month liver biopsy analysis from the phase III REGENERATE trial of OCA for the treatment of NASH with a consensus panel analysis, provide additional histology data in a larger population, and evaluate safety from >8,000 total patient-years' exposure with nearly 1,000 participants receiving study drug for >4 years. Digitized whole-slide images were evaluated independently by panels of three pathologists using the NASH Clinical Research Network scoring system. Primary endpoints were (1) ≥1 stage improvement in fibrosis with no worsening of NASH or (2) NASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis. Safety was assessed by laboratory values and adverse events. Prespecified efficacy analyses included 931 participants. The proportion of participants achieving a ≥1 stage improvement in fibrosis with no worsening of NASH was 22.4% for OCA 25 mg vs. 9.6% for placebo (p <0.0001). More participants receiving OCA 25 mg vs. placebo achieved NASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis (6.5% vs. 3.5%, respectively; p = 0.093). Histology data in a larger population of 1,607 participants supported these results. Safety data included 2,477 participants. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs, and deaths was not substantively different across treatment groups. Pruritus was the most common TEAE. Rates of adjudicated hepatic, renal, and cardiovascular events were low and similar across treatment groups. These results confirm the antifibrotic effect of OCA 25 mg. OCA was generally well tolerated over long-term dosing. These data support a positive benefit:risk profile in patients with pre-cirrhotic liver fibrosis due to NASH. Patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) often have liver scarring (fibrosis), which causes an increased risk of liver-related illness and death. Preventing progression of fibrosis to cirrhosis or reversing fibrosis are the main goals of drug development for NASH. In this clinical trial of obeticholic acid (OCA) in patients with NASH (REGENERATE), we reaffirmed our previous results demonstrating that OCA was superior to placebo in improving fibrosis using a more rigorous consensus panel analysis of liver biopsies taken at month 18. We also showed that OCA treatment resulted in dose-dependent reductions of serum liver biochemistries and liver stiffness measurements compared with placebo, even in participants in whom histologic fibrosis did not change at 18 months, providing evidence that the benefit of OCA extends beyond what is captured by the ordinal NASH CRN scoring system. OCA was well tolerated with a favorable safety profile supporting a positive benefit: risk profile in patients with pre-cirrhotic liver fibrosis due to NASH.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND & AIMS OBJECTIVE
Obeticholic acid (OCA) is a first-in-class farnesoid X receptor agonist and antifibrotic agent in development for the treatment of pre-cirrhotic liver fibrosis due to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). We aimed to validate the original 18-month liver biopsy analysis from the phase III REGENERATE trial of OCA for the treatment of NASH with a consensus panel analysis, provide additional histology data in a larger population, and evaluate safety from >8,000 total patient-years' exposure with nearly 1,000 participants receiving study drug for >4 years.
METHODS METHODS
Digitized whole-slide images were evaluated independently by panels of three pathologists using the NASH Clinical Research Network scoring system. Primary endpoints were (1) ≥1 stage improvement in fibrosis with no worsening of NASH or (2) NASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis. Safety was assessed by laboratory values and adverse events.
RESULTS RESULTS
Prespecified efficacy analyses included 931 participants. The proportion of participants achieving a ≥1 stage improvement in fibrosis with no worsening of NASH was 22.4% for OCA 25 mg vs. 9.6% for placebo (p <0.0001). More participants receiving OCA 25 mg vs. placebo achieved NASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis (6.5% vs. 3.5%, respectively; p = 0.093). Histology data in a larger population of 1,607 participants supported these results. Safety data included 2,477 participants. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs, and deaths was not substantively different across treatment groups. Pruritus was the most common TEAE. Rates of adjudicated hepatic, renal, and cardiovascular events were low and similar across treatment groups.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
These results confirm the antifibrotic effect of OCA 25 mg. OCA was generally well tolerated over long-term dosing. These data support a positive benefit:risk profile in patients with pre-cirrhotic liver fibrosis due to NASH.
IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS UNASSIGNED
Patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) often have liver scarring (fibrosis), which causes an increased risk of liver-related illness and death. Preventing progression of fibrosis to cirrhosis or reversing fibrosis are the main goals of drug development for NASH. In this clinical trial of obeticholic acid (OCA) in patients with NASH (REGENERATE), we reaffirmed our previous results demonstrating that OCA was superior to placebo in improving fibrosis using a more rigorous consensus panel analysis of liver biopsies taken at month 18. We also showed that OCA treatment resulted in dose-dependent reductions of serum liver biochemistries and liver stiffness measurements compared with placebo, even in participants in whom histologic fibrosis did not change at 18 months, providing evidence that the benefit of OCA extends beyond what is captured by the ordinal NASH CRN scoring system. OCA was well tolerated with a favorable safety profile supporting a positive benefit: risk profile in patients with pre-cirrhotic liver fibrosis due to NASH.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37517454
pii: S0168-8278(23)04993-0
doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.07.014
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1110-1120

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Arun J Sanyal (AJ)

Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. Electronic address: arun.sanyal@vcuhealth.org.

Vlad Ratziu (V)

Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Institute for Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France.

Rohit Loomba (R)

University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Quentin M Anstee (QM)

Translational & Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK; Newcastle NIHR Biomedical Research Center, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

Kris V Kowdley (KV)

Liver Institute Northwest, Seattle, WA, USA.

Mary E Rinella (ME)

University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

Muhammad Y Sheikh (MY)

Fresno Clinical Research Center, Fresno, CA, USA.

James F Trotter (JF)

Baylor Health, Liver Consultants of Texas, Dallas, TX, USA.

Whitfield Knapple (W)

Arkansas Gastroenterology, North Little Rock, AR, USA.

Eric J Lawitz (EJ)

Texas Liver Institute, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.

Manal F Abdelmalek (MF)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Philip N Newsome (PN)

National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Jérôme Boursier (J)

Angers University Hospital, Angers University, Angers, France.

Philippe Mathurin (P)

Hepatogastroenterology, CHU Lille, Lille, France.

Jean-François Dufour (JF)

Center for Digestive Diseases, Lausanne, Switzerland.

M Michelle Berrey (MM)

Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Morristown, NJ, USA.

Steven J Shiff (SJ)

Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Morristown, NJ, USA.

Sangeeta Sawhney (S)

Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Morristown, NJ, USA.

Thomas Capozza (T)

Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Morristown, NJ, USA.

Rina Leyva (R)

Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Morristown, NJ, USA.

Stephen A Harrison (SA)

Pinnacle Clinical Research Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.

Zobair M Younossi (ZM)

Beatty Liver and Obesity Research Program, Center for Liver Diseases, Inova Medicine, Falls Church, VA, USA.

Classifications MeSH