Radiological characteristics of hallux valgus with metatarsus adductus: A matched case-control study.

Forefoot deformity Hallux valgus Metatarsus adductus

Journal

Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association
ISSN: 1436-2023
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Sci
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 9604934

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Jul 2023
Historique:
received: 14 04 2023
revised: 10 07 2023
accepted: 19 07 2023
medline: 31 7 2023
pubmed: 31 7 2023
entrez: 30 7 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

No evidence has been found to support the hypothesis that there is a correlation between hallux valgus (HV) and intermetatarsal (IM) angles in HV with metatarsus adductus (MA) and that IM angle in HV with MA is lower than that in HV without MA. The present study aimed to analyze the radiographic characteristics of HV with MA compared to matched controls and to clarify the differences between HV with MA and without MA. Preoperative radiographs of 126 female patients (164 feet) who underwent hallux valgus surgery were reviewed. The HV, IM, and MA angles were measured. The MA was defined as MA angle of 20° or greater. Of all the feet, 37 (22.6%) had HV with MA (MA group). Control A (111 feet) having HV without MA was matched by age, gender, and BMI to MA group; Control B (79 feet) having HV without MA was matched by age, gender, BMI, and HV angle to the sub-MA group (31 feet) having HV with MA. The correlation coefficient between the HV and IM angles in the MA group was considered negligible (r = 0.08, p = 0.63), whereas the correlation coefficient in Control A was considered moderate (r = 0.57, p < 0.00001). The correlation coefficient in the MA group was significantly smaller than in Control A (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the HV angle between the sub-MA group and Control B (p = 0.23), but the IM angle was significantly smaller than in Control B (p = 0.002). There is no significant correlation between the HV and IM angles in HV with MA, as there is in HV without MA. HV with MA has a significantly smaller IM angle for the HV angle compared to HV without MA.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
No evidence has been found to support the hypothesis that there is a correlation between hallux valgus (HV) and intermetatarsal (IM) angles in HV with metatarsus adductus (MA) and that IM angle in HV with MA is lower than that in HV without MA. The present study aimed to analyze the radiographic characteristics of HV with MA compared to matched controls and to clarify the differences between HV with MA and without MA.
METHODS METHODS
Preoperative radiographs of 126 female patients (164 feet) who underwent hallux valgus surgery were reviewed. The HV, IM, and MA angles were measured. The MA was defined as MA angle of 20° or greater. Of all the feet, 37 (22.6%) had HV with MA (MA group). Control A (111 feet) having HV without MA was matched by age, gender, and BMI to MA group; Control B (79 feet) having HV without MA was matched by age, gender, BMI, and HV angle to the sub-MA group (31 feet) having HV with MA.
RESULTS RESULTS
The correlation coefficient between the HV and IM angles in the MA group was considered negligible (r = 0.08, p = 0.63), whereas the correlation coefficient in Control A was considered moderate (r = 0.57, p < 0.00001). The correlation coefficient in the MA group was significantly smaller than in Control A (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the HV angle between the sub-MA group and Control B (p = 0.23), but the IM angle was significantly smaller than in Control B (p = 0.002).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
There is no significant correlation between the HV and IM angles in HV with MA, as there is in HV without MA. HV with MA has a significantly smaller IM angle for the HV angle compared to HV without MA.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37517890
pii: S0949-2658(23)00200-2
doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2023.07.011
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest None.

Auteurs

Ryuzo Okuda (R)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rakusai-Shimizu Hospital, 13-107, Oe Kutsukake-cho, Nishikyo-ku Kyoto, 610-1106, Japan. Electronic address: ryuokuda@car.ocn.ne.jp.

Minako Sumikawa (M)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rakusai-Shimizu Hospital, 13-107, Oe Kutsukake-cho, Nishikyo-ku Kyoto, 610-1106, Japan. Electronic address: minako.sumikawa@ompu.ac.jp.

Hiroaki Shima (H)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7, Daigaku-machi Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-0801, Japan. Electronic address: hiroaki.shima@ompu.ac.jp.

Classifications MeSH