Improved adherence to hip fracture standards reduces mortality after hip fractures.

Best practice tariffs Hip fracture standards Hip fractures Mortality

Journal

The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland
ISSN: 1479-666X
Titre abrégé: Surgeon
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 101168329

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Jul 2023
Historique:
received: 09 11 2022
revised: 11 02 2023
accepted: 25 06 2023
medline: 31 7 2023
pubmed: 31 7 2023
entrez: 30 7 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Hip fractures are increasing in incidence due to increasing life expectancy. Mortality continues to improve but it is important to explore which factors are responsible for driving improvements. A cohort of hip fracture patients predating SARS-CoV-2 was examined to determine the predictors of adherence to the six Irish Hip Fracture Standards (IHFS) and the impact of adherence on short (30 day) and long term (1 year) mortality. Our primary aim was assess the impact of a single HFS and cumulative number of HFS on mortality after hip fracture. Our secondary aim was to determine the impact of the HFS which are intrinsically linked to specialist Geriatric care. Across 962 patients, over 5 years, the factors which were associated with adherence to HFS were female gender, increasing ASA grade and being nursed on an orthopaedic ward. Patients with increasing ASA were more likely to have met HFS 4-6 (Geriatrician review HFS4, bone health HFS5 & specialist falls assessment HFS6), less likely to have surgery within 48 h are more likely to develop a pressure ulcer. If the patient was not nursed on an orthopaedic ward all HFS were less likely to be met. At 30 days HFS 4-6 were associated with a statistically significant odds ratio (OR) of being alive, while at one year HFS 1 (admitted to an orthopaedic ward within 4 h), 5 and 6 were associated with a statistically significant OR of being alive. As increasing numbers of hip fracture standards were met patients were more likely to be alive at 30 days and one year. This study has identified that improved adherence to hip fracture standards are associated with improved mortality at 30 days and one year.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Hip fractures are increasing in incidence due to increasing life expectancy. Mortality continues to improve but it is important to explore which factors are responsible for driving improvements.
METHODS METHODS
A cohort of hip fracture patients predating SARS-CoV-2 was examined to determine the predictors of adherence to the six Irish Hip Fracture Standards (IHFS) and the impact of adherence on short (30 day) and long term (1 year) mortality. Our primary aim was assess the impact of a single HFS and cumulative number of HFS on mortality after hip fracture. Our secondary aim was to determine the impact of the HFS which are intrinsically linked to specialist Geriatric care.
RESULTS RESULTS
Across 962 patients, over 5 years, the factors which were associated with adherence to HFS were female gender, increasing ASA grade and being nursed on an orthopaedic ward. Patients with increasing ASA were more likely to have met HFS 4-6 (Geriatrician review HFS4, bone health HFS5 & specialist falls assessment HFS6), less likely to have surgery within 48 h are more likely to develop a pressure ulcer. If the patient was not nursed on an orthopaedic ward all HFS were less likely to be met. At 30 days HFS 4-6 were associated with a statistically significant odds ratio (OR) of being alive, while at one year HFS 1 (admitted to an orthopaedic ward within 4 h), 5 and 6 were associated with a statistically significant OR of being alive. As increasing numbers of hip fracture standards were met patients were more likely to be alive at 30 days and one year.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This study has identified that improved adherence to hip fracture standards are associated with improved mortality at 30 days and one year.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37517981
pii: S1479-666X(23)00083-5
doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2023.06.007
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest All authors state that there are no competing conflicts of interest to declare.

Auteurs

E P Murphy (EP)

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, St Vincents University Hospital Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland. Electronic address: evelynmurphy@hotmail.com.

R P Murphy (RP)

Department of Geriatric and Stroke Medicine, Saolta Hospital Group, Galway University Hospital, Newcastle Road, Galway, Ireland. Electronic address: Robmurph8@hotmail.com.

D McKenna (D)

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, St Vincents University Hospital Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland. Electronic address: dmckenna100@gmail.com.

P Miller (P)

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, St Vincents University Hospital Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland. Electronic address: Peggy.miller0496@gmail.com.

R Doyle (R)

Department of Geriatric Medicine, St. Vincents University Hospital Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland. Electronic address: Rachael.doyle@hse.ie.

C Hurson (C)

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, St Vincents University Hospital Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland. Electronic address: conorhurson@gmail.com.

Classifications MeSH