Mechanisms by which chloropicrin fumigation promotes soil potassium conversion and absorption.

chloropicrin soil fumigation soil microorganism soil potassium tomato

Journal

Frontiers in microbiology
ISSN: 1664-302X
Titre abrégé: Front Microbiol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101548977

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 20 04 2023
accepted: 30 06 2023
medline: 31 7 2023
pubmed: 31 7 2023
entrez: 31 7 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Fumigation of soil using chloropicrin has been proven to significantly affect soil nutrient cycling, but the mechanism by which soil potassium conversion and plant uptake is promoted remains unclear. In this study, we conducted a fumigation experiment to investigate the effects of chloropicrin soil fumigation on the conversion of soil potassium post-fumigation (days 7-70), and its mechanisms, tomatos were planted in fumigated and non-fumigated soils to enable further comparisons. Results showed that the content of rapidly available potassium and available potassium decreased by 16-24% and 17-23% at day 28 respectively, when tomato was planted in chloropicrin-fumigated soils compared to the non-fumigated soils. The potassium content of tomato planted in fumigated soil was significantly higher than that planted in non-fumigated soil (30.3 vs. 21.9 mg g

Identifiants

pubmed: 37520378
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1208973
pmc: PMC10373873
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1208973

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Sun, Zeng, Fang, Hua, Huang, Wang, Cao, Zhu and Zhang.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Sci Total Environ. 2020 Apr 1;711:135080
pubmed: 31818557
Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet. 2002;67(2):171-80
pubmed: 12701420
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 10;650(Pt 1):44-55
pubmed: 30196225
Environ Pollut. 2020 Jan;256:113415
pubmed: 31672346
Environ Geochem Health. 2006 Feb-Apr;28(1-2):133-40
pubmed: 16528584
Front Microbiol. 2018 Oct 23;9:2529
pubmed: 30405582
Environ Pollut. 2017 Aug;227:534-542
pubmed: 28499263
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Jun 23;11:904
pubmed: 32655607
mSystems. 2018 Nov 6;3(6):
pubmed: 30417111
Environ Microbiol. 2016 May;18(5):1403-14
pubmed: 26271760
J Agric Food Chem. 2018 Nov 7;66(44):11580-11591
pubmed: 30339379
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020 Jan 15;187:109850
pubmed: 31677569
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Nov 15;598:1027-1036
pubmed: 28476076
ISME J. 2012 Aug;6(8):1621-4
pubmed: 22402401
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 11;9(3):e91767
pubmed: 24618853
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 15;108 Suppl 1:4516-22
pubmed: 20534432
J Agric Food Chem. 2020 May 6;68(18):5049-5058
pubmed: 32134657

Auteurs

Yang Sun (Y)

Institute of Plant Protection, Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanchang, China.

Rong Zeng (R)

Institute of Plant Protection, Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanchang, China.

Wensheng Fang (W)

Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.

Jvling Hua (J)

Institute of Plant Protection, Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanchang, China.

Shuijin Huang (S)

Institute of Plant Protection, Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanchang, China.

Qiuxia Wang (Q)

Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.

Aocheng Cao (A)

Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.

Feng Zhu (F)

Institute of Plant Protection, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang, China.

Haiyan Zhang (H)

Institute of Plant Protection, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang, China.

Classifications MeSH