Assessment of image rejection in digital radiography.

ionizing radiation medical imaging reject analysis

Journal

Journal of medicine and life
ISSN: 1844-3117
Titre abrégé: J Med Life
Pays: Romania
ID NLM: 101477617

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2023
Historique:
received: 11 12 2022
accepted: 06 04 2023
medline: 31 7 2023
pubmed: 31 7 2023
entrez: 31 7 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

X-ray imaging uses ionizing radiation to generate diagnostic images. However, unnecessary radiation exposure can pose potential risks, including an increased risk of malignancy. One factor contributing to unnecessary radiation exposure is the rejection and retaking of X-ray images, which can lead to higher patient and occupational radiation doses. This study aimed to assess digital radiography rejection rates, causes of recurrence, and the most commonly repeated types of examinations. A cross-sectional online-based survey was conducted in 2022, involving 62 randomly selected radiographers in the UAE. The survey was distributed to radiographers through the head of radiology departments in various hospitals. Hospitals agreed to participate in the survey without disclosing their name. The data collected was analyzed using Excel. The study showed that 71% of radiographers working in the UAE hold a bachelor's degree. The examinations most frequently repeated were related to anatomical areas, with the spine accounting for 37.7% and facial bone for 19.7% of cases. The factors influencing repetition were primarily related to positioning (48.4%) and artifacts (21%), with the motion being the main cause of artifacts, including voluntary and involuntary movements. This study concluded that the most prevalent cause of repeating and retaking images is positioning, followed by artifacts. Furthermore, night shifts and workload impact radiographer performance, increasing the likelihood of picture retakes. The average number of rejects and repeated images has been reduced as new generations and modern equipment have been introduced, which also helped decrease the numbers.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37520472
doi: 10.25122/jml-2022-0341
pii: JMedLife-16-731
pmc: PMC10375339
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

731-735

Informations de copyright

©2023 JOURNAL of MEDICINE and LIFE.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Références

Acta Radiol Open. 2015 Oct 08;4(10):2058460115604339
pubmed: 26500784
J Med Radiat Sci. 2021 Sep;68(3):245-252
pubmed: 33826800
Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2018 Oct 04;9(4):
pubmed: 30309440
Acta Radiol. 2012 Mar 1;53(2):174-8
pubmed: 22287147
Radiographics. 2018 May-Jun;38(3):833-846
pubmed: 29676963
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019 May 29;33:49
pubmed: 31456973
J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Jul;12(7):689-95
pubmed: 25963225

Auteurs

Mohamed Hasaneen (M)

Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Fatima College of Health Sciences, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Noora AlHameli (N)

Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Fatima College of Health Sciences, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Amel AlMinhali (A)

Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Fatima College of Health Sciences, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Shamma Alshehhi (S)

Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Fatima College of Health Sciences, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Suliman Salih (S)

Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Fatima College of Health Sciences, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Mohammad Mubarak Alomaim (MM)

King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Classifications MeSH