Exploring the association between perceived male attitudes and female attitudes toward the discontinuation of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting in Egypt.

Egypt FGM/C female attitudes female genital cutting perceived male attitudes

Journal

Frontiers in sociology
ISSN: 2297-7775
Titre abrégé: Front Sociol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101777459

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 10 03 2023
accepted: 19 06 2023
medline: 31 7 2023
pubmed: 31 7 2023
entrez: 31 7 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

There are 200 million girls and women alive worldwide that have undergone the practice of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) and 4 million girls are at risk of undergoing the practice each year. FGM/C provides no known health benefits, while puts a plethora of medical, psychological, and sexual health risks into perspective. One of the countries where the prevalence of FGM/C is the highest in the World, even though local authorities legally banned the practice in 2008, is Egypt. Within the Egyptian context, there are several complex socioeconomic, religious, and cultural drivers that influence the familial decision making of the daughters being cut. Female attitudes hold great significance in the process, because mothers and female family members are typically the prime decision makers at the daughter's circumcision. However, whilst FGM/C is often performed to enhance marriageability and address male preferences, in practicing communities there is little to no open communication between men and women about the practice, making women rely on their perceptions on FGM/C related expectations of men. Even though the connection between female and perceived male attitudes toward the discontinuation was established almost 20 years ago, since then to our knowledge little is known about the further characteristics of this association. Therefore, this study aims to explore the association between female and perceived male attitudes within families of a younger cohort and moreover attempts to provide a more layered picture of it within different levels of education. To explore the relation between female and perceived male attitudes toward the discontinuation of FGM/C we conducted a 3-step binary logistic regression model. Our results show that women are significantly less likely to favor a continuation of FGM/C if they think men are disapproving of the practice, compared to women that think men want it to continue. The strength of this association partially varies between the different levels of education as it is less pronounced at the level of secondary education, compared to the reference group. In alignment with previous findings in the literature, women were more likely to support the discontinuation of FGM/C if they believed that men want the practice to discontinue as well and vice versa. At a higher level of secondary education however this association is less pronounced. This result concludes that the role of perceived male attitudes should be an important factor associated with female ones and studied further, and underlines the importance of education in women empowerment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37520496
doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1183989
pmc: PMC10374422
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1183989

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Zsabokorszky, Van de Velde, Michielsen and Van Eekert.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Nurs Health Sci. 2007 Dec;9(4):270-6
pubmed: 17958676
BMC Public Health. 2015 Oct 08;15:1034
pubmed: 26449728
Cult Health Sex. 2018 Feb;20(2):173-182
pubmed: 28675330
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 6;15(3):e0229917
pubmed: 32142530
Health Care Women Int. 2017 May;38(5):478-491
pubmed: 28151072
J Sex Med. 2014 Nov;11(11):2756-63
pubmed: 25123710
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Jul;114(1):47-50
pubmed: 21513937
J Health Soc Behav. 2002 Sep;43(3):336-58
pubmed: 12467257
J Inj Violence Res. 2010 Jan;2(1):41-5
pubmed: 21483197
Arch Iran Med. 2009 Mar;12(2):154-60
pubmed: 19249886
SSM Popul Health. 2017 Dec;3:283-293
pubmed: 29302613
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Feb 24;15:31
pubmed: 26911243
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 10;15:874
pubmed: 26357927
BMC Public Health. 2013 Oct 03;13:921
pubmed: 24090097
Midwifery. 2016 Mar;34:30-35
pubmed: 26971445
Reprod Health. 2018 Oct 17;15(1):175
pubmed: 30333019
J Transcult Nurs. 2020 Sep;31(5):468-478
pubmed: 31535943
BMC Womens Health. 2020 May 11;20(1):100
pubmed: 32393248
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 12;17(10):
pubmed: 32408674
Stud Fam Plann. 1980 Jan;11(1):3-16
pubmed: 7376234
Health Care Women Int. 2020 Jun;41(6):709-726
pubmed: 31747359
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013;2013:467028
pubmed: 23843795
Reprod Health. 2020 Jun 10;17(1):91
pubmed: 32522224
J Sex Marital Ther. 2001 Oct-Dec;27(5):593-8
pubmed: 11554223
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Dec;53(11):1455-60
pubmed: 11710420

Auteurs

Zita Zsabokorszky (Z)

International Centre for Reproductive Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Data Science Institute, I-Biostat, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.

Sarah Van de Velde (S)

Centre for Population, Family and Health, Department of Sociology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Kristien Michielsen (K)

International Centre for Reproductive Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Nina Van Eekert (N)

Centre for Population, Family and Health, Department of Sociology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Classifications MeSH